tirewheelguide
Head-to-head Updated

Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 vs Hankook Dynapro HP2 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 186 + 10 owner reviews. How we score

DynaPro A/TM RF10 is ahead, 71–58

Check price on Amazon · DynaPro A/TM RF10 or Dynapro HP2 on Amazon
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Hankook Dynapro HP2
Tire BHankook

Dynapro HP2

All-Season

Provisional

Tests – · none yet Owners 52 · 10 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 73

    Dry

    DynaPro A/TM RF10 +14
    59
    Why this score
    SourceDynaPro A/TM RF10Dynapro HP2
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 71 (est.)≈ 62 (est.)
    Reviews found online7755

    DynaPro A/TM RF10: 60% × 71.3 (est.) + 40% × 76.6 = 73

    Dynapro HP2: 60% × 62.4 (est.) + 40% × 54.6 = 59

    No road tests of dry for DynaPro A/TM RF10. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

    No road tests of dry for Dynapro HP2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

  2. 74

    Wet

    DynaPro A/TM RF10 +17
    57
    Why this score
    SourceDynaPro A/TM RF10Dynapro HP2
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 73 (est.)≈ 60 (est.)
    Reviews found online7553

    DynaPro A/TM RF10: 60% × 72.8 (est.) + 40% × 75.2 = 74

    Dynapro HP2: 60% × 60.2 (est.) + 40% × 52.7 = 57

    No road tests of wet for DynaPro A/TM RF10. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

    No road tests of wet for Dynapro HP2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

  3. 65

    Snow

    DynaPro A/TM RF10 +6
    59
    Why this score
    SourceDynaPro A/TM RF10Dynapro HP2
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)≈ 64 (est.)
    Reviews found online6252

    DynaPro A/TM RF10: 60% × 67.1 (est.) + 40% × 61.6 = 65

    Dynapro HP2: 60% × 63.9 (est.) + 40% × 51.9 = 59

    No road tests of snow for DynaPro A/TM RF10. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).

    No road tests of snow for Dynapro HP2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).

  4. 72

    Comfort

    DynaPro A/TM RF10 +12
    60
    Why this score
    SourceDynaPro A/TM RF10Dynapro HP2
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 70 (est.)≈ 66 (est.)
    Reviews found online7551

    DynaPro A/TM RF10: 60% × 70.2 (est.) + 40% × 75.4 = 72

    Dynapro HP2: 60% × 65.9 (est.) + 40% × 50.5 = 60

    No road tests of comfort for DynaPro A/TM RF10 or Dynapro HP2. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 70

    Noise

    DynaPro A/TM RF10 +7
    63
    Why this score
    SourceDynaPro A/TM RF10Dynapro HP2
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online7358

    DynaPro A/TM RF10: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 72.9 = 70

    Dynapro HP2: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 57.7 = 63

    No road tests of noise for DynaPro A/TM RF10 or Dynapro HP2. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 71

    Treadwear

    DynaPro A/TM RF10 +17
    54
    Why this score
    SourceDynaPro A/TM RF10Dynapro HP2
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 69 (est.)≈ 60 (est.)
    Reviews found online7546

    DynaPro A/TM RF10: 60% × 68.6 (est.) + 40% × 75.3 = 71

    Dynapro HP2: 60% × 59.6 (est.) + 40% × 46 = 54

    No road tests of treadwear for DynaPro A/TM RF10. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

    No road tests of treadwear for Dynapro HP2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

  7. 71

    Handling (owners)

    DynaPro A/TM RF10 +20
    51
    Why this score
    SourceDynaPro A/TM RF10Dynapro HP2
    Reviews found online7151
Scores at a glance
CategoryHankook DynaPro A/TM RF10Hankook Dynapro HP2
Relative Score 71 58
Dry 73 59
Wet 74 57
Snow 65 59
Comfort 72 60
Noise 70 63
Treadwear 71 54
Handling (owners) 71 51

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score

DynaPro A/TM RF10

Dynapro HP2

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A DynaPro A/TM RF10

Pros

  • Exceptional tread life and durability
  • Low road noise compared to other all-terrain tires
  • Strong value proposition and competitive pricing

Cons

  • Inconsistent traction on wet pavement and ice
  • Reports of sidewall vulnerability to punctures
  • Potential for increased fuel consumption
All owner themes in the DynaPro A/TM RF10 review

Tire B Dynapro HP2

Pros

  • Reliable handling and roadability on dry pavement
  • Good fuel economy and low rolling resistance contributing to high MPG
  • Capably handles towing duties on all-wheel-drive vehicles

Cons

  • Faster-than-expected tread wear reported by multiple users
  • Poor wet weather performance and dangerous sliding tendencies in rain
  • Inconsistent snow traction, with some users noting a lack of confidence in winter conditions
All owner themes in the Dynapro HP2 review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 B · Hankook Dynapro HP2
CategoryAll-Terrain tireAll-Season
Vehicle typeSUV and 4x4SUV and 4x4
Sizes available2944
Rim diameters15″ – 20″15″ – 20″
Tread depth13/32″—
UTQG560 A B—
Treadwear warranty50,000 mi—
SidewallOutlined White Lettering—
Max pressure44 psi—
Sizes in common1515

Which one should you actually buy?

Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10

Hankook Dynapro HP2

Winner: Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 — better handling, wet and treadwear. It leads or ties in every category we score. Hankook Dynapro HP2 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 10 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 scores 71 vs 51 on handling.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 scores 74 vs 57 on wet.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 scores 71 vs 54 on treadwear.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 scores 73 vs 59 on dry.

Tire A · Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Hankook Dynapro HP2
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

DynaPro A/TM RF10 or Dynapro HP2?

Which is better in the wet, DynaPro A/TM RF10 or Dynapro HP2?

Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10, 74 vs 57 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, DynaPro A/TM RF10 or Dynapro HP2?

Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10, 73 vs 59 on our dry score.

Which is better in snow, DynaPro A/TM RF10 or Dynapro HP2?

Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10, 65 vs 59 on our snow score.

Which is quieter, DynaPro A/TM RF10 or Dynapro HP2?

Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10, 70 vs 63 on our noise score.

Which is more comfortable, DynaPro A/TM RF10 or Dynapro HP2?

Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10, 72 vs 60 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, DynaPro A/TM RF10 or Dynapro HP2?

Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10, 71 vs 54 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology