tirewheelguide
Head-to-head Updated

Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 vs Kumho Road Venture AT51 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 186 + 154 owner reviews. How we score

DynaPro A/TM RF10 is ahead, 71–66

Check price on Amazon · DynaPro A/TM RF10 or Road Venture AT51 on Amazon
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 73

    Dry

    DynaPro A/TM RF10 +6
    67
    Why this score
    SourceDynaPro A/TM RF10Road Venture AT51
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 71 (est.)≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online7767

    DynaPro A/TM RF10: 60% × 71.3 (est.) + 40% × 76.6 = 73

    Road Venture AT51: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 66.6 = 67

    No road tests of dry for DynaPro A/TM RF10. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

    No road tests of dry for Road Venture AT51. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

  2. 74

    Wet

    DynaPro A/TM RF10 +5
    69
    Why this score
    SourceDynaPro A/TM RF10Road Venture AT51
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 73 (est.)≈ 69 (est.)
    Reviews found online7569

    DynaPro A/TM RF10: 60% × 72.8 (est.) + 40% × 75.2 = 74

    Road Venture AT51: 60% × 69.1 (est.) + 40% × 68.6 = 69

    No road tests of wet for DynaPro A/TM RF10. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

    No road tests of wet for Road Venture AT51. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

  3. 65

    Snow

    Road Venture AT51 +4
    69
    Why this score
    SourceDynaPro A/TM RF10Road Venture AT51
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)≈ 69 (est.)
    Reviews found online6268

    DynaPro A/TM RF10: 60% × 67.1 (est.) + 40% × 61.6 = 65

    Road Venture AT51: 60% × 69.2 (est.) + 40% × 67.8 = 69

    No road tests of snow for DynaPro A/TM RF10. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).

    No road tests of snow for Road Venture AT51. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).

  4. 72

    Comfort

    DynaPro A/TM RF10 +6
    66
    Why this score
    SourceDynaPro A/TM RF10Road Venture AT51
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 70 (est.)≈ 68 (est.)
    Reviews found online7562

    DynaPro A/TM RF10: 60% × 70.2 (est.) + 40% × 75.4 = 72

    Road Venture AT51: 60% × 68 (est.) + 40% × 62.3 = 66

    No road tests of comfort for DynaPro A/TM RF10 or Road Venture AT51. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 70

    Noise

    DynaPro A/TM RF10 +6
    64
    Why this score
    SourceDynaPro A/TM RF10Road Venture AT51
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online7360

    DynaPro A/TM RF10: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 72.9 = 70

    Road Venture AT51: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 60.1 = 64

    No road tests of noise for DynaPro A/TM RF10 or Road Venture AT51. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 71

    Treadwear

    DynaPro A/TM RF10 +10
    61
    Why this score
    SourceDynaPro A/TM RF10Road Venture AT51
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 69 (est.)≈ 63 (est.)
    Reviews found online7557

    DynaPro A/TM RF10: 60% × 68.6 (est.) + 40% × 75.3 = 71

    Road Venture AT51: 60% × 63 (est.) + 40% × 57.2 = 61

    No road tests of treadwear for DynaPro A/TM RF10. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

    No road tests of treadwear for Road Venture AT51. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

  7. 71

    Handling (owners)

    DynaPro A/TM RF10 +9
    62
    Why this score
    SourceDynaPro A/TM RF10Road Venture AT51
    Reviews found online7162
Scores at a glance
CategoryHankook DynaPro A/TM RF10Kumho Road Venture AT51
Relative Score 71 66
Dry 73 67
Wet 74 69
Snow 65 69
Comfort 72 66
Noise 70 64
Treadwear 71 61
Handling (owners) 71 62

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score

DynaPro A/TM RF10

Road Venture AT51

The professional test results behind the scores

Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.

In the overall rankings of 1 tests that ran both, Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 finished ahead 1 times and Kumho Road Venture AT51 0 times.

DisciplineCategoryDynaPro A/TM RF10Road Venture AT51ΔHead-to-head
Also published by the testers (not in the score)
Overall Ranking Overall #14/13 #17/13 – 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2018 SA4x4 All-Terrain Tire Test R17 · 265/65R17

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A DynaPro A/TM RF10

Pros

  • Exceptional tread life and durability
  • Low road noise compared to other all-terrain tires
  • Strong value proposition and competitive pricing

Cons

  • Inconsistent traction on wet pavement and ice
  • Reports of sidewall vulnerability to punctures
  • Potential for increased fuel consumption
All owner themes in the DynaPro A/TM RF10 review

Tire B Road Venture AT51

Pros

  • Exceptional value and affordable price point compared to premium competitors
  • Impressive traction and confidence in snow and winter conditions
  • Quiet and smooth highway ride with minimal road noise for an all-terrain tire

Cons

  • Faster-than-expected tread wear for some users under heavy or everyday use
  • Poor self-cleaning capabilities in deep or heavy mud
  • Reduced wet traction and potential slippage when the tread wears low
All owner themes in the Road Venture AT51 review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 B · Kumho Road Venture AT51
CategoryAll-Terrain tireAll-Terrain tire
Vehicle typeSUV and 4x4SUV and 4x4
Sizes available2910
Rim diameters15″ – 20″15″ – 18″
Tread depth13/32″13.5/32″
UTQG560 A B540 A A
Treadwear warranty50,000 mi55,000 mi
SidewallOutlined White LetteringBlackwall
Max pressure44 psi65 psi
Sizes in common77

Which one should you actually buy?

Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10

Kumho Road Venture AT51

Winner: Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 — better treadwear, handling and dry. Pick the Kumho Road Venture AT51 if snow matters most to you.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 scores 71 vs 61 on treadwear.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 scores 71 vs 62 on handling.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 scores 73 vs 67 on dry.

Pick tire A You want the most comfortable ride

Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 scores 72 vs 66 on comfort.

Tire A · Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Kumho Road Venture AT51
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

DynaPro A/TM RF10 or Road Venture AT51?

Which is better in the wet, DynaPro A/TM RF10 or Road Venture AT51?

Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10, 74 vs 69 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, DynaPro A/TM RF10 or Road Venture AT51?

Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10, 73 vs 67 on our dry score.

Which is better in snow, DynaPro A/TM RF10 or Road Venture AT51?

Kumho Road Venture AT51, 69 vs 65 on our snow score.

Which is quieter, DynaPro A/TM RF10 or Road Venture AT51?

Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10, 70 vs 64 on our noise score.

Which is more comfortable, DynaPro A/TM RF10 or Road Venture AT51?

Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10, 72 vs 66 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, DynaPro A/TM RF10 or Road Venture AT51?

Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10, 71 vs 61 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology