Head-to-head Updated

Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 vs Michelin Agilis CrossClimate — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 2 road tests and 186 + 1,068 owner reviews. How we score

Agilis CrossClimate is ahead, 76–71

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Michelin Agilis CrossClimate
Tire BMichelin

Agilis CrossClimate

All Season

Tests 72 · 2 tests Owners 81 · 1,068 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 7 in 2020 Commercial Van All Season Tyre Test (dry braking)

“We have the Agilis cross climates on our C-class 3.5t MH and have been utterly delighted with them. They’re quiet, really grippy and give a great ride. What’s not to like?”

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 73

    Dry

    Agilis CrossClimate +4
    77
    Why this score
    SourceDynaPro A/TM RF10Agilis CrossClimate
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 2 tests≈ 71 (est.)71
    Reviews found online7785

    DynaPro A/TM RF10: 60% × 71.3 (est.) + 40% × 76.6 = 73

    Agilis CrossClimate: 60% × 71.5 + 40% × 85.1 = 77

    No road tests of dry for DynaPro A/TM RF10. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

  2. 74

    Wet

    Agilis CrossClimate +2
    76
    Why this score
    SourceDynaPro A/TM RF10Agilis CrossClimate
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 2 tests≈ 73 (est.)71
    Reviews found online7584

    DynaPro A/TM RF10: 60% × 72.8 (est.) + 40% × 75.2 = 74

    Agilis CrossClimate: 60% × 71.3 + 40% × 83.9 = 76

    No road tests of wet for DynaPro A/TM RF10. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

  3. 65

    Snow

    Agilis CrossClimate +11
    76
    Why this score
    SourceDynaPro A/TM RF10Agilis CrossClimate
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 2 tests≈ 67 (est.)75
    Reviews found online6279

    DynaPro A/TM RF10: 60% × 67.1 (est.) + 40% × 61.6 = 65

    Agilis CrossClimate: 60% × 74.8 + 40% × 79 = 76

    No road tests of snow for DynaPro A/TM RF10. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).

  4. 72

    Comfort

    Agilis CrossClimate +2
    74
    Why this score
    SourceDynaPro A/TM RF10Agilis CrossClimate
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 70 (est.)≈ 71 (est.)
    Reviews found online7580

    DynaPro A/TM RF10: 60% × 70.2 (est.) + 40% × 75.4 = 72

    Agilis CrossClimate: 60% × 70.9 (est.) + 40% × 79.5 = 74

    No road tests of comfort for DynaPro A/TM RF10 or Agilis CrossClimate. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 70

    Noise

    Agilis CrossClimate +4
    74
    Why this score
    SourceDynaPro A/TM RF10Agilis CrossClimate
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests≈ 67 (est.)73
    Reviews found online7376

    DynaPro A/TM RF10: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 72.9 = 70

    Agilis CrossClimate: 60% × 72.9 + 40% × 76.4 = 74

    No road tests of noise for DynaPro A/TM RF10. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 71

    Treadwear

    Agilis CrossClimate +1
    72
    Why this score
    SourceDynaPro A/TM RF10Agilis CrossClimate
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 69 (est.)≈ 69 (est.)
    Reviews found online7577

    DynaPro A/TM RF10: 60% × 68.6 (est.) + 40% × 75.3 = 71

    Agilis CrossClimate: 60% × 69.2 (est.) + 40% × 77.2 = 72

    No road tests of treadwear for DynaPro A/TM RF10. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

    No road tests of treadwear for Agilis CrossClimate. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

  7. 71

    Handling (owners)

    Agilis CrossClimate +9
    80
    Why this score
    SourceDynaPro A/TM RF10Agilis CrossClimate
    Reviews found online7180
Scores at a glance
Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 vs Michelin Agilis CrossClimate: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryHankook DynaPro A/TM RF10Michelin Agilis CrossClimate
Relative Score 71 76
Dry 73 77
Wet 74 76
Snow 65 76
Comfort 72 74
Noise 70 74
Treadwear 71 72
Handling (owners) 71 80

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score

DynaPro A/TM RF10

Agilis CrossClimate

The professional test results behind the scores

Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.

DisciplineCategoryDynaPro A/TM RF10Agilis CrossClimateΔHead-to-head
Also published by the testers (not in the score)
Overall Ranking Overall #4/5 2019 4x4 Australia All-Terrain Tire Test R17 #1/4 2022 Auto Bild Reisemobil Commercial All-Season Tire Test R16 – Different tests

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A DynaPro A/TM RF10

Pros

  • Exceptional tread life and durability
  • Low road noise compared to other all-terrain tires
  • Strong value proposition and competitive pricing

Cons

  • Inconsistent traction on wet pavement and ice
  • Reports of sidewall vulnerability to punctures
  • Potential for increased fuel consumption
All owner themes in the DynaPro A/TM RF10 review

Tire B Agilis CrossClimate

Pros

  • Outstanding wet and winter weather traction
  • Exceptional tread life and long-term durability
  • Stiff sidewalls providing enhanced cornering stability and handling

Cons

  • Slightly higher road noise or low drone at certain speeds
  • Higher initial purchase price compared to standard options
  • A few reports of a minor decrease in fuel economy
All owner themes in the Agilis CrossClimate review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10

We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.

Tire B

Michelin Agilis CrossClimate

Positive

Community sentiment toward the Michelin Agilis CrossClimate is largely positive, with owners of vans, RVs, and heavy-duty trucks praising its wet and snow traction, quiet ride, and capability under heavy loads. However, discussions frequently highlight trade-offs such as faster tread wear compared to the Defender series and concerns regarding an NHTSA recall on certain C-metric sizes for snow traction marking non-compliance. Prospective buyers also note confusion regarding the differing directional C-metric and non-directional LT-metric designs.

vwvortex.com ·2026-09-12

“I'd be happy with anything from Uniroyal, Michelin or Continental depending on application, My Van has Michelin agiliscrossclimates all round, the Passat has Rainsports (which are getting a bit old) and the Touran has Michelin Primacy , I have had Continental on an E34 in the past though they were quite expensive. All 3 are linked in one way or another, Uniroyal in Europe being owned by Continental, in north America they're owned by Michelin !”

vwcaliforniaclub.com ·5 upvotes ·2024-07-02

“I fitted these to our 680 Michelin Agilis Crossclimate 235/60 R17C 117/115R 8PR, 3PMSF And they work well, better off tarmac (Grassy muddy farm track) than the factory tyres and felt better in heavy rain. I can’t recall if ride quality changed tho.”

f150forum.com

“I bought a set of Agilis for my 2017 F250 King Ranch two years ago. I live in Colorado and I was attracted to the idea that they could possibly be left on year round and not have to swap between summer and winter tires. I have swapped between summer and winter tires for the past 25 years here in Colorado and I have tried tires that were supposedly "ALL SEASON" but they were always a compromise, not great in the summer and as a highway tire and not great in the winter as a snow or ice tire. The Agilis has been the only tire that has great summer performance, quiet and nice handling and also it has been hard to believe, but they act pretty close to Blizzaks I've had in the past for winter driving. I have 25,000 miles on them and they are wearing very well, and have not become noisy. I'm surprised there are not more accolades on these tires. They came out on top vs several other all season tires.”

Top themes
#Heavy load capability#Winter and snow traction#Tread wear longevity#Defender LTX comparison#C-metric recall notice#Ride comfort and noise#Van and RV use

Based on 54 community posts

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 B · Michelin Agilis CrossClimate
CategoryAll-Terrain tireAll Season
Vehicle typeSUV and 4x4Van
Sizes available2922
Rim diameters15″ – 20″15″ – 17″
Tread depth13/32″—
UTQG560 A B—
Treadwear warranty50,000 mi—
SidewallOutlined White Lettering—
Max pressure44 psi—
Sizes in common33

Which one should you actually buy?

Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10

Michelin Agilis CrossClimate

Winner: Michelin Agilis CrossClimate — better snow, handling and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score.

Pick tire B You drive through snowy winters

Michelin Agilis CrossClimate scores 76 vs 65 on snow.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Michelin Agilis CrossClimate scores 80 vs 71 on handling.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Michelin Agilis CrossClimate scores 77 vs 73 on dry.

Pick tire B You want a quieter cabin

Michelin Agilis CrossClimate scores 74 vs 70 on noise.

Tire A · Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10
Tire B · Michelin Agilis CrossClimate

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

DynaPro A/TM RF10 or Agilis CrossClimate?

Which is better in the wet, DynaPro A/TM RF10 or Agilis CrossClimate?

Neither, by our numbers: 74 vs 76 on the wet score, within 3 points.

Which grips better on dry roads, DynaPro A/TM RF10 or Agilis CrossClimate?

Michelin Agilis CrossClimate, 77 vs 73 on our dry score.

Which is better in snow, DynaPro A/TM RF10 or Agilis CrossClimate?

Michelin Agilis CrossClimate, 76 vs 65 on our snow score.

Which is quieter, DynaPro A/TM RF10 or Agilis CrossClimate?

Michelin Agilis CrossClimate, 74 vs 70 on our noise score.

Which is more comfortable, DynaPro A/TM RF10 or Agilis CrossClimate?

Neither, by our numbers: 72 vs 74 on the comfort score, within 3 points.

Which lasts longer, DynaPro A/TM RF10 or Agilis CrossClimate?

Neither, by our numbers: 71 vs 72 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology