Tests – · none yet Owners 73 · 186 reviews
Michelin Defender looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.
Head-to-head
Updated
Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 vs Michelin Defender — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 186 + 4 owner reviews. How we score
Too close to call: DynaPro A/TM RF10 73, Defender 72.
Add your size for an exact match
/R
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
73
Dry
Level73Why this score
Source DynaPro A/TM RF10 Defender Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 71 (est.) ≈ 71 (est.) Reviews found online 77 76 DynaPro A/TM RF10: 60% × 71.3 (est.) + 40% × 76.6 = 73
Defender: 60% × 71.2 (est.) + 40% × 76.4 = 73
No road tests of dry for DynaPro A/TM RF10. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
No road tests of dry for Defender. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
-
74
Wet
DynaPro A/TM RF10 +173Why this score
Source DynaPro A/TM RF10 Defender Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 73 (est.) ≈ 72 (est.) Reviews found online 75 74 DynaPro A/TM RF10: 60% × 72.8 (est.) + 40% × 75.2 = 74
Defender: 60% × 72.2 (est.) + 40% × 74.1 = 73
No road tests of wet for DynaPro A/TM RF10. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
No road tests of wet for Defender. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
-
65
Snow
No comparison–Why this score
Source DynaPro A/TM RF10 Defender Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 67 (est.) – Reviews found online 62 – DynaPro A/TM RF10: 60% × 67.1 (est.) + 40% × 61.6 = 65
No road tests of snow for DynaPro A/TM RF10. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).
-
72
Comfort
DynaPro A/TM RF10 +171Why this score
Source DynaPro A/TM RF10 Defender Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 70 (est.) ≈ 70 (est.) Reviews found online 75 73 DynaPro A/TM RF10: 60% × 70.2 (est.) + 40% × 75.4 = 72
Defender: 60% × 69.9 (est.) + 40% × 73.4 = 71
No road tests of comfort for DynaPro A/TM RF10 or Defender. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
70
Noise
No comparison–Why this score
Source DynaPro A/TM RF10 Defender Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 67 (est.) – Reviews found online 73 – DynaPro A/TM RF10: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 72.9 = 70
No road tests of noise for DynaPro A/TM RF10. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
71
Treadwear
DynaPro A/TM RF10 +269Why this score
Source DynaPro A/TM RF10 Defender Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 69 (est.) ≈ 67 (est.) Reviews found online 75 72 DynaPro A/TM RF10: 60% × 68.6 (est.) + 40% × 75.3 = 71
Defender: 60% × 67.5 (est.) + 40% × 71.6 = 69
No road tests of treadwear for DynaPro A/TM RF10. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
No road tests of treadwear for Defender. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
-
71
Handling (owners)
Defender +677Why this score
Source DynaPro A/TM RF10 Defender Reviews found online 71 77
Scores at a glance
| Category | Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 | Michelin Defender |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 73 | 72 |
| Dry | 73 | 73 |
| Wet | 74 | 73 |
| Snow | 65 | – |
| Comfort | 72 | 71 |
| Noise | 70 | – |
| Treadwear | 71 | 69 |
| Handling (owners) | 71 | 77 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
73
/ 100
DynaPro A/TM RF10
72
/ 100
Defender
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A DynaPro A/TM RF10
Pros
- Exceptional tread life and durability
- Low road noise compared to other all-terrain tires
- Strong value proposition and competitive pricing
Cons
- Inconsistent traction on wet pavement and ice
- Reports of sidewall vulnerability to punctures
- Potential for increased fuel consumption
Tire B Defender
Pros
- Excellent ride comfort and quiet operation
- Strong tread life and durability over several years
- Reliable grip on dry pavement
Cons
- Susceptibility to hydroplaning in heavy rain
- Limited traction in deep or severe snow
- Audible squealing during aggressive dry-pavement acceleration
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 | B · Michelin Defender |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All-Terrain tire | Summer Premium Touring tires |
| Vehicle type | SUV and 4x4 | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 29 | — |
| Rim diameters | 15″ – 20″ | — |
| Tread depth | 13/32″ | — |
| UTQG | 560 A B | — |
| Treadwear warranty | 50,000 mi | — |
| Sidewall | Outlined White Lettering | — |
| Max pressure | 44 psi | — |
Which one should you actually buy?
73
/ 100
Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10
72
/ 100
Michelin Defender
Too close to call: Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 and Michelin Defender are within 2 points overall. Michelin Defender is stronger on handling. Michelin Defender rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 4 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Pick tire B
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Michelin Defender scores 77 vs 71 on handling.
Tire A · Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10
Tire B · Michelin Defender
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
DynaPro A/TM RF10 or Defender?
Which is better in the wet, DynaPro A/TM RF10 or Defender?
Neither, by our numbers: 74 vs 73 on the wet score, within 3 points.
Which grips better on dry roads, DynaPro A/TM RF10 or Defender?
Neither, by our numbers: 73 vs 73 on the dry score, within 3 points.
Which is more comfortable, DynaPro A/TM RF10 or Defender?
Neither, by our numbers: 72 vs 71 on the comfort score, within 3 points.
Which lasts longer, DynaPro A/TM RF10 or Defender?
Neither, by our numbers: 71 vs 69 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology