Tests – · none yet Owners 73 · 186 reviews
Head-to-head
Updated
Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 vs Michelin LTX A/T2 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 1 road tests and 186 + 7 owner reviews. How we score
LTX A/T2 leads, 74–71 Narrow edge
Add your size for an exact match
/R
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
73
Dry
Level73Why this score
Source DynaPro A/TM RF10 LTX A/T2 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 71 (est.) ≈ 71 (est.) Reviews found online 77 76 DynaPro A/TM RF10: 60% × 71.3 (est.) + 40% × 76.6 = 73
LTX A/T2: 60% × 71.1 (est.) + 40% × 76 = 73
No road tests of dry for DynaPro A/TM RF10. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
No road tests of dry for LTX A/T2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
-
74
Wet
Level74Why this score
Source DynaPro A/TM RF10 LTX A/T2 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 73 (est.) ≈ 73 (est.) Reviews found online 75 76 DynaPro A/TM RF10: 60% × 72.8 (est.) + 40% × 75.2 = 74
LTX A/T2: 60% × 73.3 (est.) + 40% × 76.1 = 74
No road tests of wet for DynaPro A/TM RF10. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
No road tests of wet for LTX A/T2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
-
65
Snow
LTX A/T2 +671Why this score
Source DynaPro A/TM RF10 LTX A/T2 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 67 (est.) ≈ 70 (est.) Reviews found online 62 71 DynaPro A/TM RF10: 60% × 67.1 (est.) + 40% × 61.6 = 65
LTX A/T2: 60% × 70.3 (est.) + 40% × 71 = 71
No road tests of snow for DynaPro A/TM RF10. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).
No road tests of snow for LTX A/T2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).
-
72
Comfort
DynaPro A/TM RF10 +171Why this score
Source DynaPro A/TM RF10 LTX A/T2 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 70 (est.) ≈ 70 (est.) Reviews found online 75 73 DynaPro A/TM RF10: 60% × 70.2 (est.) + 40% × 75.4 = 72
LTX A/T2: 60% × 69.7 (est.) + 40% × 72.5 = 71
No road tests of comfort for DynaPro A/TM RF10 or LTX A/T2. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
70
Noise
DynaPro A/TM RF10 +169Why this score
Source DynaPro A/TM RF10 LTX A/T2 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 67 (est.) ≈ 67 (est.) Reviews found online 73 71 DynaPro A/TM RF10: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 72.9 = 70
LTX A/T2: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 71.3 = 69
No road tests of noise for DynaPro A/TM RF10 or LTX A/T2. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
71
Treadwear
LTX A/T2 +778Why this score
Source DynaPro A/TM RF10 LTX A/T2 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests ≈ 69 (est.) 82 Reviews found online 75 73 DynaPro A/TM RF10: 60% × 68.6 (est.) + 40% × 75.3 = 71
LTX A/T2: 60% × 81.8 + 40% × 73.2 = 78
No road tests of treadwear for DynaPro A/TM RF10. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
-
71
Handling (owners)
LTX A/T2 +778Why this score
Source DynaPro A/TM RF10 LTX A/T2 Reviews found online 71 78
Scores at a glance
| Category | Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 | Michelin LTX A/T2 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 71 | 74 |
| Dry | 73 | 73 |
| Wet | 74 | 74 |
| Snow | 65 | 71 |
| Comfort | 72 | 71 |
| Noise | 70 | 69 |
| Treadwear | 71 | 78 |
| Handling (owners) | 71 | 78 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
71
/ 100
DynaPro A/TM RF10
74
/ 100
LTX A/T2
The professional test results behind the scores
Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.
In the overall rankings of 1 tests that ran both, Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 finished ahead 0 times and Michelin LTX A/T2 1 times.
| Discipline | Category | DynaPro A/TM RF10 | LTX A/T2 | Δ | Head-to-head |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Also published by the testers (not in the score) | |||||
| Overall Ranking | Overall | #14/13 | #5/13 | – | 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2018 SA4x4 All-Terrain Tire Test R17 · 265/65R17 |
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A DynaPro A/TM RF10
Pros
- Exceptional tread life and durability
- Low road noise compared to other all-terrain tires
- Strong value proposition and competitive pricing
Cons
- Inconsistent traction on wet pavement and ice
- Reports of sidewall vulnerability to punctures
- Potential for increased fuel consumption
Tire B LTX A/T2
Pros
- Exceptional tread longevity and overall durability
- Reliable wet and dry road traction
- Improved steering response and ride comfort compared to competitors
Cons
- Premium price point
- Performance in deep snow and ice is considered adequate but not class-leading
- Rubber compounds may become slippery or lose traction as the tire reaches advanced age
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 | B · Michelin LTX A/T2 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All-Terrain tire | All-Terrain tire |
| Vehicle type | SUV and 4x4 | SUV and 4x4 |
| Sizes available | 29 | — |
| Rim diameters | 15″ – 20″ | — |
| Tread depth | 13/32″ | — |
| UTQG | 560 A B | — |
| Treadwear warranty | 50,000 mi | — |
| Sidewall | Outlined White Lettering | — |
| Max pressure | 44 psi | — |
Which one should you actually buy?
71
/ 100
Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10
74
/ 100
Michelin LTX A/T2
Narrow edge: Michelin LTX A/T2 — better treadwear, handling and snow. Where the Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 is ahead, it is by less than 3 points. Michelin LTX A/T2 rests on little evidence so far (1 test, 7 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Pick tire B
You want the longest tread life
Michelin LTX A/T2 scores 78 vs 71 on treadwear.
Pick tire B
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Michelin LTX A/T2 scores 78 vs 71 on handling.
Pick tire B
You drive through snowy winters
Michelin LTX A/T2 scores 71 vs 65 on snow.
Tire A · Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10
Tire B · Michelin LTX A/T2
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
DynaPro A/TM RF10 or LTX A/T2?
Which is better in the wet, DynaPro A/TM RF10 or LTX A/T2?
Neither, by our numbers: 74 vs 74 on the wet score, within 3 points.
Which grips better on dry roads, DynaPro A/TM RF10 or LTX A/T2?
Neither, by our numbers: 73 vs 73 on the dry score, within 3 points.
Which is better in snow, DynaPro A/TM RF10 or LTX A/T2?
Michelin LTX A/T2, 71 vs 65 on our snow score.
Which is quieter, DynaPro A/TM RF10 or LTX A/T2?
Neither, by our numbers: 70 vs 69 on the noise score, within 3 points.
Which is more comfortable, DynaPro A/TM RF10 or LTX A/T2?
Neither, by our numbers: 72 vs 71 on the comfort score, within 3 points.
Which lasts longer, DynaPro A/TM RF10 or LTX A/T2?
Michelin LTX A/T2, 78 vs 71 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology