Tests – · none yet Owners 73 · 186 reviews
Head-to-head
Updated
Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 vs Michelin Primacy HP — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 186 + 204 owner reviews. How we score
DynaPro A/TM RF10 is ahead, 73–65
Add your size for an exact match
/R
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 63 · 204 reviews
“Sounds as if Aus is rationalising inventory John. Pity because the HP is a good dirt road tyre with stones around. That said the XM2 is also a tough tyre & designed to take knocks that would damage High Performance summer tyres.”
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
73
Dry
DynaPro A/TM RF10 +865Why this score
Source DynaPro A/TM RF10 Primacy HP Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 71 (est.) ≈ 66 (est.) Reviews found online 77 64 DynaPro A/TM RF10: 60% × 71.3 (est.) + 40% × 76.6 = 73
Primacy HP: 60% × 66.2 (est.) + 40% × 63.9 = 65
No road tests of dry for DynaPro A/TM RF10. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
No road tests of dry for Primacy HP. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
-
74
Wet
DynaPro A/TM RF10 +866Why this score
Source DynaPro A/TM RF10 Primacy HP Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 73 (est.) ≈ 67 (est.) Reviews found online 75 65 DynaPro A/TM RF10: 60% × 72.8 (est.) + 40% × 75.2 = 74
Primacy HP: 60% × 67.1 (est.) + 40% × 65 = 66
No road tests of wet for DynaPro A/TM RF10. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
No road tests of wet for Primacy HP. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
-
65
Snow
No comparison–Why this score
Source DynaPro A/TM RF10 Primacy HP Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 67 (est.) – Reviews found online 62 – DynaPro A/TM RF10: 60% × 67.1 (est.) + 40% × 61.6 = 65
No road tests of snow for DynaPro A/TM RF10. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).
-
72
Comfort
DynaPro A/TM RF10 +765Why this score
Source DynaPro A/TM RF10 Primacy HP Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 70 (est.) ≈ 68 (est.) Reviews found online 75 61 DynaPro A/TM RF10: 60% × 70.2 (est.) + 40% × 75.4 = 72
Primacy HP: 60% × 67.7 (est.) + 40% × 61 = 65
No road tests of comfort for DynaPro A/TM RF10 or Primacy HP. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
70
Noise
No comparison–Why this score
Source DynaPro A/TM RF10 Primacy HP Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 67 (est.) – Reviews found online 73 – DynaPro A/TM RF10: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 72.9 = 70
No road tests of noise for DynaPro A/TM RF10. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
71
Treadwear
DynaPro A/TM RF10 +764Why this score
Source DynaPro A/TM RF10 Primacy HP Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 69 (est.) ≈ 65 (est.) Reviews found online 75 62 DynaPro A/TM RF10: 60% × 68.6 (est.) + 40% × 75.3 = 71
Primacy HP: 60% × 64.6 (est.) + 40% × 62.3 = 64
No road tests of treadwear for DynaPro A/TM RF10. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
No road tests of treadwear for Primacy HP. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
-
71
Handling (owners)
DynaPro A/TM RF10 +962Why this score
Source DynaPro A/TM RF10 Primacy HP Reviews found online 71 62
Scores at a glance
| Category | Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 | Michelin Primacy HP |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 73 | 65 |
| Dry | 73 | 65 |
| Wet | 74 | 66 |
| Snow | 65 | – |
| Comfort | 72 | 65 |
| Noise | 70 | – |
| Treadwear | 71 | 64 |
| Handling (owners) | 71 | 62 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
73
/ 100
DynaPro A/TM RF10
65
/ 100
Primacy HP
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
The professional test results behind the scores
Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.
| Discipline | Category | DynaPro A/TM RF10 | Primacy HP | Δ | Head-to-head |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Also published by the testers (not in the score) | |||||
| Overall Ranking | Overall | #4/5 2019 4x4 Australia All-Terrain Tire Test R17 | #5/6 2010 Autocar Tyre Test - FWD | – | Different tests |
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A DynaPro A/TM RF10
Pros
- Exceptional tread life and durability
- Low road noise compared to other all-terrain tires
- Strong value proposition and competitive pricing
Cons
- Inconsistent traction on wet pavement and ice
- Reports of sidewall vulnerability to punctures
- Potential for increased fuel consumption
Tire B Primacy HP
Pros
- Exceptional tread life and longevity
- Strong dry-road grip and handling
- High fuel efficiency and low rolling resistance
Cons
- Noticeable decline in wet-weather grip as tread depth decreases
- High retail price compared to competitors
- Increased road noise as the tire ages
What real owners are saying
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Tire A
Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
Tire B
Mixed
Michelin Primacy HP
Community opinion on the Michelin Primacy HP is divided depending on use case: enthusiasts frequently criticize them for lacking grip compared to dedicated Pilot Sport performance tires, though many appreciate their playful, low-traction slide characteristics on cars like the GR86/BRZ. Owners also note their low rolling resistance and suitability for mild climates, but raise occasional discussions around shoulder cracking with age and their limitation as summer-only rubber.
r/ft86
·2 upvotes ·2016-01-21
“PSA: The Stock Michelin Primacy HP tires are SUMMER tires! I figured, given that winter has finally arrived in much of the US, I'd make a quick reminder that this car ships in the US with summer only tires. I've noticed that this fact is rarely mentioned in threads about snowy weather or winter tires, and I myself didn't realize this until just before I bought mine. A quick explanation for the non-car guys in the sub. Most cars in the US sell new with all-season tires mounted. These are tires that maintain a balance to allow them to work OK on hot dry pavement, in the rain, and in winter weather. Not great, but OK. They're a jack of all trades, master of none In contrast, these cars (at least in the US market) shipped with summer-only tires. This means that they are NOT OK for use in winter weather--even just cold dry pavement. Summer tires are made of a compound that is too hard in cold weather, therefore not sticky even on clean pavement. In addition, they often lack the open spaces in the tread that are necessary for good snow traction.”
gr86.org
·2024-11-11
“So long as you’ve got some tread, the stock Primacy HP tires are plenty safe for Bay Area weather all year ‘round. Just don’t drive anywhere that gets real winter weather or freezing temps. I’d avoid trips up to Tahoe in January. And don’t climb Mt. Diablo or Mt. Hamilton when they get their occasional dusting of snow. (I live in upstate NY now, so I’m familiar with tires & winter conditions …but I’m also a Bay Area native.)”
mbworld.org
“I have these tires on my 2013 GL550 and they handle really well here in Chicago. They are a little loud for me, but do great in the snow and rain.”
Top themes
#grip vs playfulness#comparison to pilot sport#summer tire limitations#tread cracking concerns#low rolling resistance#oem fitment discussion
Based on 36 community posts
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 | B · Michelin Primacy HP |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All-Terrain tire | Summer |
| Vehicle type | SUV and 4x4 | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 29 | 1 |
| Rim diameters | 15″ – 20″ | 17″ |
| Tread depth | 13/32″ | — |
| UTQG | 560 A B | — |
| Treadwear warranty | 50,000 mi | — |
| Sidewall | Outlined White Lettering | — |
| Max pressure | 44 psi | — |
Which one should you actually buy?
73
/ 100
Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10
65
/ 100
Michelin Primacy HP
Winner: Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 — better handling, dry and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Pick tire A
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 scores 71 vs 62 on handling.
Pick tire A
You want the most grip on dry roads
Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 scores 73 vs 65 on dry.
Pick tire A
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 scores 74 vs 66 on wet.
Pick tire A
You want the most comfortable ride
Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 scores 72 vs 65 on comfort.
Tire A · Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10
Tire B · Michelin Primacy HP
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
DynaPro A/TM RF10 or Primacy HP?
Which is better in the wet, DynaPro A/TM RF10 or Primacy HP?
Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10, 74 vs 66 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, DynaPro A/TM RF10 or Primacy HP?
Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10, 73 vs 65 on our dry score.
Which is more comfortable, DynaPro A/TM RF10 or Primacy HP?
Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10, 72 vs 65 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, DynaPro A/TM RF10 or Primacy HP?
Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10, 71 vs 64 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology