Pirelli Scorpion A/T looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.

Head-to-head Updated

Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 vs Pirelli Scorpion A/T — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 186 + 4 owner reviews. How we score

DynaPro A/TM RF10 is ahead, 72–64

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Pirelli Scorpion A/T
Tire BPirelli

Scorpion A/T

All Season All Terrain and Off Road tires

Provisional

Tests – · none yet Owners 61 · 4 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 73

    Dry

    DynaPro A/TM RF10 +7
    66
    Why this score
    SourceDynaPro A/TM RF10Scorpion A/T
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 71 (est.)≈ 66 (est.)
    Reviews found online7764

    DynaPro A/TM RF10: 60% × 71.3 (est.) + 40% × 76.6 = 73

    Scorpion A/T: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 64.4 = 66

    No road tests of dry for DynaPro A/TM RF10. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

    No road tests of dry for Scorpion A/T. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

  2. 74

    Wet

    DynaPro A/TM RF10 +8
    66
    Why this score
    SourceDynaPro A/TM RF10Scorpion A/T
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 73 (est.)≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online7565

    DynaPro A/TM RF10: 60% × 72.8 (est.) + 40% × 75.2 = 74

    Scorpion A/T: 60% × 67.2 (est.) + 40% × 65.2 = 66

    No road tests of wet for DynaPro A/TM RF10. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

    No road tests of wet for Scorpion A/T. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

  3. 65

    Snow

    DynaPro A/TM RF10 +12
    53
    Why this score
    SourceDynaPro A/TM RF10Scorpion A/T
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)≈ 61 (est.)
    Reviews found online6242

    DynaPro A/TM RF10: 60% × 67.1 (est.) + 40% × 61.6 = 65

    Scorpion A/T: 60% × 60.8 (est.) + 40% × 42.3 = 53

    No road tests of snow for DynaPro A/TM RF10. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).

    No road tests of snow for Scorpion A/T. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).

  4. 72

    Comfort

    DynaPro A/TM RF10 +6
    66
    Why this score
    SourceDynaPro A/TM RF10Scorpion A/T
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 70 (est.)≈ 68 (est.)
    Reviews found online7563

    DynaPro A/TM RF10: 60% × 70.2 (est.) + 40% × 75.4 = 72

    Scorpion A/T: 60% × 68 (est.) + 40% × 62.6 = 66

    No road tests of comfort for DynaPro A/TM RF10 or Scorpion A/T. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 70

    Noise

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceDynaPro A/TM RF10Scorpion A/T
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)–
    Reviews found online73–

    DynaPro A/TM RF10: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 72.9 = 70

    No road tests of noise for DynaPro A/TM RF10. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 71

    Treadwear

    DynaPro A/TM RF10 +8
    63
    Why this score
    SourceDynaPro A/TM RF10Scorpion A/T
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 69 (est.)≈ 64 (est.)
    Reviews found online7562

    DynaPro A/TM RF10: 60% × 68.6 (est.) + 40% × 75.3 = 71

    Scorpion A/T: 60% × 64.5 (est.) + 40% × 61.9 = 63

    No road tests of treadwear for DynaPro A/TM RF10. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

    No road tests of treadwear for Scorpion A/T. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

  7. 71

    Handling (owners)

    DynaPro A/TM RF10 +5
    66
    Why this score
    SourceDynaPro A/TM RF10Scorpion A/T
    Reviews found online7166
Scores at a glance
Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 vs Pirelli Scorpion A/T: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryHankook DynaPro A/TM RF10Pirelli Scorpion A/T
Relative Score 72 64
Dry 73 66
Wet 74 66
Snow 65 53
Comfort 72 66
Noise 70 –
Treadwear 71 63
Handling (owners) 71 66

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score

DynaPro A/TM RF10

Scorpion A/T

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A DynaPro A/TM RF10

Pros

  • Exceptional tread life and durability
  • Low road noise compared to other all-terrain tires
  • Strong value proposition and competitive pricing

Cons

  • Inconsistent traction on wet pavement and ice
  • Reports of sidewall vulnerability to punctures
  • Potential for increased fuel consumption
All owner themes in the DynaPro A/TM RF10 review

Tire B Scorpion A/T

Pros

  • Excellent wet-weather traction and cornering stability
  • Noticeable improvement in ride comfort and noise levels
  • Strong off-road capability

Cons

  • Reports of premature dry rotting in certain climates
  • Inconsistent longevity across different usage scenarios
  • Occasional reports of increased road noise
All owner themes in the Scorpion A/T review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 B · Pirelli Scorpion A/T
CategoryAll-Terrain tireAll Season All Terrain and Off Road tires
Vehicle typeSUV and 4x4SUV and 4x4
Sizes available29—
Rim diameters15″ – 20″—
Tread depth13/32″—
UTQG560 A B—
Treadwear warranty50,000 mi—
SidewallOutlined White Lettering—
Max pressure44 psi—

Which one should you actually buy?

Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10

Pirelli Scorpion A/T

Winner: Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 — better snow, wet and treadwear. It leads or ties in every category we score. Pirelli Scorpion A/T rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 4 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire A You drive through snowy winters

Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 scores 65 vs 53 on snow.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 scores 74 vs 66 on wet.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 scores 71 vs 63 on treadwear.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 scores 73 vs 66 on dry.

Tire A · Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10
Tire B · Pirelli Scorpion A/T

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

DynaPro A/TM RF10 or Scorpion A/T?

Which is better in the wet, DynaPro A/TM RF10 or Scorpion A/T?

Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10, 74 vs 66 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, DynaPro A/TM RF10 or Scorpion A/T?

Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10, 73 vs 66 on our dry score.

Which is better in snow, DynaPro A/TM RF10 or Scorpion A/T?

Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10, 65 vs 53 on our snow score.

Which is more comfortable, DynaPro A/TM RF10 or Scorpion A/T?

Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10, 72 vs 66 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, DynaPro A/TM RF10 or Scorpion A/T?

Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10, 71 vs 63 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology