Head-to-head Updated

Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 vs Pirelli Scorpion STR — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 186 + 57 owner reviews. How we score

DynaPro A/TM RF10 is ahead, 71–64

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 73

    Dry

    DynaPro A/TM RF10 +9
    64
    Why this score
    SourceDynaPro A/TM RF10Scorpion STR
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 71 (est.)≈ 65 (est.)
    Reviews found online7761

    DynaPro A/TM RF10: 60% × 71.3 (est.) + 40% × 76.6 = 73

    Scorpion STR: 60% × 65.1 (est.) + 40% × 61.2 = 64

    No road tests of dry for DynaPro A/TM RF10. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

    No road tests of dry for Scorpion STR. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

  2. 74

    Wet

    DynaPro A/TM RF10 +7
    67
    Why this score
    SourceDynaPro A/TM RF10Scorpion STR
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 73 (est.)≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online7565

    DynaPro A/TM RF10: 60% × 72.8 (est.) + 40% × 75.2 = 74

    Scorpion STR: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 65.4 = 67

    No road tests of wet for DynaPro A/TM RF10. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

    No road tests of wet for Scorpion STR. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

  3. 65

    Snow

    DynaPro A/TM RF10 +4
    61
    Why this score
    SourceDynaPro A/TM RF10Scorpion STR
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)≈ 65 (est.)
    Reviews found online6255

    DynaPro A/TM RF10: 60% × 67.1 (est.) + 40% × 61.6 = 65

    Scorpion STR: 60% × 64.8 (est.) + 40% × 54.5 = 61

    No road tests of snow for DynaPro A/TM RF10. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).

    No road tests of snow for Scorpion STR. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).

  4. 72

    Comfort

    DynaPro A/TM RF10 +10
    62
    Why this score
    SourceDynaPro A/TM RF10Scorpion STR
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 70 (est.)≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online7555

    DynaPro A/TM RF10: 60% × 70.2 (est.) + 40% × 75.4 = 72

    Scorpion STR: 60% × 66.7 (est.) + 40% × 55.2 = 62

    No road tests of comfort for DynaPro A/TM RF10 or Scorpion STR. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 70

    Noise

    DynaPro A/TM RF10 +4
    66
    Why this score
    SourceDynaPro A/TM RF10Scorpion STR
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online7365

    DynaPro A/TM RF10: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 72.9 = 70

    Scorpion STR: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 64.5 = 66

    No road tests of noise for DynaPro A/TM RF10 or Scorpion STR. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 71

    Treadwear

    DynaPro A/TM RF10 +10
    61
    Why this score
    SourceDynaPro A/TM RF10Scorpion STR
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 69 (est.)≈ 63 (est.)
    Reviews found online7557

    DynaPro A/TM RF10: 60% × 68.6 (est.) + 40% × 75.3 = 71

    Scorpion STR: 60% × 62.9 (est.) + 40% × 56.9 = 61

    No road tests of treadwear for DynaPro A/TM RF10. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

    No road tests of treadwear for Scorpion STR. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

  7. 71

    Handling (owners)

    DynaPro A/TM RF10 +9
    62
    Why this score
    SourceDynaPro A/TM RF10Scorpion STR
    Reviews found online7162
Scores at a glance
Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 vs Pirelli Scorpion STR: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryHankook DynaPro A/TM RF10Pirelli Scorpion STR
Relative Score 71 64
Dry 73 64
Wet 74 67
Snow 65 61
Comfort 72 62
Noise 70 66
Treadwear 71 61
Handling (owners) 71 62

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score

DynaPro A/TM RF10

Scorpion STR

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A DynaPro A/TM RF10

Pros

  • Exceptional tread life and durability
  • Low road noise compared to other all-terrain tires
  • Strong value proposition and competitive pricing

Cons

  • Inconsistent traction on wet pavement and ice
  • Reports of sidewall vulnerability to punctures
  • Potential for increased fuel consumption
All owner themes in the DynaPro A/TM RF10 review

Tire B Scorpion STR

Pros

  • Exceptional tread life and durability, with many users reporting 40,000 to 80,000+ miles of use.
  • Quiet and comfortable ride quality, particularly on highway surfaces.
  • Strong performance in wet and snowy conditions, providing a secure, surefooted feel.

Cons

  • Increased road noise and potential for rougher ride quality as the tread wears down.
  • Inconsistent tread life reports, with some users experiencing premature wear compared to expectations.
  • Mixed feedback on wet-weather grip, with some users finding it inferior to dedicated summer or high-performance alternatives.
All owner themes in the Scorpion STR review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 B · Pirelli Scorpion STR
CategoryAll-Terrain tireAll Season
Vehicle typeSUV and 4x4SUV and 4x4
Sizes available294
Rim diameters15″ – 20″17″ – 20″
Tread depth13/32″10/32″
UTQG560 A B520 A A
Treadwear warranty50,000 mi65,000 mi
SidewallOutlined White LetteringBlackwall
Max pressure44 psi44 psi
Sizes in common11

Which one should you actually buy?

Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10

Pirelli Scorpion STR

Winner: Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 — better comfort, treadwear and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score.

Pick tire A You want the most comfortable ride

Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 scores 72 vs 62 on comfort.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 scores 71 vs 61 on treadwear.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 scores 73 vs 64 on dry.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 scores 71 vs 62 on handling.

Tire A · Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10
Tire B · Pirelli Scorpion STR

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

DynaPro A/TM RF10 or Scorpion STR?

Which is better in the wet, DynaPro A/TM RF10 or Scorpion STR?

Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10, 74 vs 67 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, DynaPro A/TM RF10 or Scorpion STR?

Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10, 73 vs 64 on our dry score.

Which is better in snow, DynaPro A/TM RF10 or Scorpion STR?

Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10, 65 vs 61 on our snow score.

Which is quieter, DynaPro A/TM RF10 or Scorpion STR?

Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10, 70 vs 66 on our noise score.

Which is more comfortable, DynaPro A/TM RF10 or Scorpion STR?

Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10, 72 vs 62 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, DynaPro A/TM RF10 or Scorpion STR?

Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10, 71 vs 61 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology