Tests – · none yet Owners 73 · 186 reviews
Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 vs Pirelli Scorpion STR — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 186 + 57 owner reviews. How we score
DynaPro A/TM RF10 is ahead, 71–64
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 60 · 57 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
73
Dry
DynaPro A/TM RF10 +964Why this score
Source DynaPro A/TM RF10 Scorpion STR Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 71 (est.) ≈ 65 (est.) Reviews found online 77 61 DynaPro A/TM RF10: 60% × 71.3 (est.) + 40% × 76.6 = 73
Scorpion STR: 60% × 65.1 (est.) + 40% × 61.2 = 64
No road tests of dry for DynaPro A/TM RF10. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
No road tests of dry for Scorpion STR. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
-
74
Wet
DynaPro A/TM RF10 +767Why this score
Source DynaPro A/TM RF10 Scorpion STR Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 73 (est.) ≈ 67 (est.) Reviews found online 75 65 DynaPro A/TM RF10: 60% × 72.8 (est.) + 40% × 75.2 = 74
Scorpion STR: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 65.4 = 67
No road tests of wet for DynaPro A/TM RF10. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
No road tests of wet for Scorpion STR. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
-
65
Snow
DynaPro A/TM RF10 +461Why this score
Source DynaPro A/TM RF10 Scorpion STR Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 67 (est.) ≈ 65 (est.) Reviews found online 62 55 DynaPro A/TM RF10: 60% × 67.1 (est.) + 40% × 61.6 = 65
Scorpion STR: 60% × 64.8 (est.) + 40% × 54.5 = 61
No road tests of snow for DynaPro A/TM RF10. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).
No road tests of snow for Scorpion STR. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).
-
72
Comfort
DynaPro A/TM RF10 +1062Why this score
Source DynaPro A/TM RF10 Scorpion STR Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 70 (est.) ≈ 67 (est.) Reviews found online 75 55 DynaPro A/TM RF10: 60% × 70.2 (est.) + 40% × 75.4 = 72
Scorpion STR: 60% × 66.7 (est.) + 40% × 55.2 = 62
No road tests of comfort for DynaPro A/TM RF10 or Scorpion STR. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
70
Noise
DynaPro A/TM RF10 +466Why this score
Source DynaPro A/TM RF10 Scorpion STR Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 67 (est.) ≈ 67 (est.) Reviews found online 73 65 DynaPro A/TM RF10: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 72.9 = 70
Scorpion STR: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 64.5 = 66
No road tests of noise for DynaPro A/TM RF10 or Scorpion STR. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
71
Treadwear
DynaPro A/TM RF10 +1061Why this score
Source DynaPro A/TM RF10 Scorpion STR Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 69 (est.) ≈ 63 (est.) Reviews found online 75 57 DynaPro A/TM RF10: 60% × 68.6 (est.) + 40% × 75.3 = 71
Scorpion STR: 60% × 62.9 (est.) + 40% × 56.9 = 61
No road tests of treadwear for DynaPro A/TM RF10. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
No road tests of treadwear for Scorpion STR. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
-
71
Handling (owners)
DynaPro A/TM RF10 +962Why this score
Source DynaPro A/TM RF10 Scorpion STR Reviews found online 71 62
Scores at a glance
| Category | Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 | Pirelli Scorpion STR |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 71 | 64 |
| Dry | 73 | 64 |
| Wet | 74 | 67 |
| Snow | 65 | 61 |
| Comfort | 72 | 62 |
| Noise | 70 | 66 |
| Treadwear | 71 | 61 |
| Handling (owners) | 71 | 62 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
DynaPro A/TM RF10
Scorpion STR
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A DynaPro A/TM RF10
Pros
- Exceptional tread life and durability
- Low road noise compared to other all-terrain tires
- Strong value proposition and competitive pricing
Cons
- Inconsistent traction on wet pavement and ice
- Reports of sidewall vulnerability to punctures
- Potential for increased fuel consumption
Tire B Scorpion STR
Pros
- Exceptional tread life and durability, with many users reporting 40,000 to 80,000+ miles of use.
- Quiet and comfortable ride quality, particularly on highway surfaces.
- Strong performance in wet and snowy conditions, providing a secure, surefooted feel.
Cons
- Increased road noise and potential for rougher ride quality as the tread wears down.
- Inconsistent tread life reports, with some users experiencing premature wear compared to expectations.
- Mixed feedback on wet-weather grip, with some users finding it inferior to dedicated summer or high-performance alternatives.
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 | B · Pirelli Scorpion STR |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All-Terrain tire | All Season |
| Vehicle type | SUV and 4x4 | SUV and 4x4 |
| Sizes available | 29 | 4 |
| Rim diameters | 15″ – 20″ | 17″ – 20″ |
| Tread depth | 13/32″ | 10/32″ |
| UTQG | 560 A B | 520 A A |
| Treadwear warranty | 50,000 mi | 65,000 mi |
| Sidewall | Outlined White Lettering | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | 44 psi | 44 psi |
| Sizes in common | 1 | 1 |
Which one should you actually buy?
Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10
Pirelli Scorpion STR
Winner: Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 — better comfort, treadwear and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 scores 72 vs 62 on comfort.
Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 scores 71 vs 61 on treadwear.
Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 scores 73 vs 64 on dry.
Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 scores 71 vs 62 on handling.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
DynaPro A/TM RF10 or Scorpion STR?
Which is better in the wet, DynaPro A/TM RF10 or Scorpion STR?
Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10, 74 vs 67 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, DynaPro A/TM RF10 or Scorpion STR?
Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10, 73 vs 64 on our dry score.
Which is better in snow, DynaPro A/TM RF10 or Scorpion STR?
Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10, 65 vs 61 on our snow score.
Which is quieter, DynaPro A/TM RF10 or Scorpion STR?
Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10, 70 vs 66 on our noise score.
Which is more comfortable, DynaPro A/TM RF10 or Scorpion STR?
Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10, 72 vs 62 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, DynaPro A/TM RF10 or Scorpion STR?
Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10, 71 vs 61 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology