tirewheelguide
Head-to-head Updated

Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 vs Sumitomo Encounter AT — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 186 + 26 owner reviews. How we score

Too close to call: DynaPro A/TM RF10 and Encounter AT are level at 71.

Check price on Amazon · DynaPro A/TM RF10 Check price on Amazon · Encounter AT
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 73

    Dry

    Level
    73
    Why this score
    SourceDynaPro A/TM RF10Encounter AT
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 71 (est.)≈ 71 (est.)
    Reviews found online7775

    DynaPro A/TM RF10: 60% × 71.3 (est.) + 40% × 76.6 = 73

    Encounter AT: 60% × 70.7 (est.) + 40% × 75.2 = 73

    No road tests of dry for DynaPro A/TM RF10. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

    No road tests of dry for Encounter AT. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

  2. 74

    Wet

    Encounter AT +1
    75
    Why this score
    SourceDynaPro A/TM RF10Encounter AT
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 73 (est.)≈ 74 (est.)
    Reviews found online7577

    DynaPro A/TM RF10: 60% × 72.8 (est.) + 40% × 75.2 = 74

    Encounter AT: 60% × 73.6 (est.) + 40% × 76.5 = 75

    No road tests of wet for DynaPro A/TM RF10. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

    No road tests of wet for Encounter AT. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

  3. 65

    Snow

    Encounter AT +4
    69
    Why this score
    SourceDynaPro A/TM RF10Encounter AT
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)≈ 69 (est.)
    Reviews found online6268

    DynaPro A/TM RF10: 60% × 67.1 (est.) + 40% × 61.6 = 65

    Encounter AT: 60% × 69.2 (est.) + 40% × 67.8 = 69

    No road tests of snow for DynaPro A/TM RF10. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).

    No road tests of snow for Encounter AT. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).

  4. 72

    Comfort

    DynaPro A/TM RF10 +3
    69
    Why this score
    SourceDynaPro A/TM RF10Encounter AT
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 70 (est.)≈ 69 (est.)
    Reviews found online7569

    DynaPro A/TM RF10: 60% × 70.2 (est.) + 40% × 75.4 = 72

    Encounter AT: 60% × 69.1 (est.) + 40% × 68.7 = 69

    No road tests of comfort for DynaPro A/TM RF10 or Encounter AT. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 70

    Noise

    DynaPro A/TM RF10 +2
    68
    Why this score
    SourceDynaPro A/TM RF10Encounter AT
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online7370

    DynaPro A/TM RF10: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 72.9 = 70

    Encounter AT: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 70 = 68

    No road tests of noise for DynaPro A/TM RF10 or Encounter AT. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 71

    Treadwear

    DynaPro A/TM RF10 +5
    66
    Why this score
    SourceDynaPro A/TM RF10Encounter AT
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 69 (est.)≈ 66 (est.)
    Reviews found online7566

    DynaPro A/TM RF10: 60% × 68.6 (est.) + 40% × 75.3 = 71

    Encounter AT: 60% × 65.7 (est.) + 40% × 65.9 = 66

    No road tests of treadwear for DynaPro A/TM RF10. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

    No road tests of treadwear for Encounter AT. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

  7. 71

    Handling (owners)

    Level
    71
    Why this score
    SourceDynaPro A/TM RF10Encounter AT
    Reviews found online7171
Scores at a glance
CategoryHankook DynaPro A/TM RF10Sumitomo Encounter AT
Relative Score 71 71
Dry 73 73
Wet 74 75
Snow 65 69
Comfort 72 69
Noise 70 68
Treadwear 71 66
Handling (owners) 71 71

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score

DynaPro A/TM RF10

Encounter AT

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A DynaPro A/TM RF10

Pros

  • Exceptional tread life and durability
  • Low road noise compared to other all-terrain tires
  • Strong value proposition and competitive pricing

Cons

  • Inconsistent traction on wet pavement and ice
  • Reports of sidewall vulnerability to punctures
  • Potential for increased fuel consumption
All owner themes in the DynaPro A/TM RF10 review

Tire B Encounter AT

Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 B · Sumitomo Encounter AT
CategoryAll-Terrain tireAll-Terrain tire
Vehicle typeSUV and 4x4SUV and 4x4
Sizes available2915
Rim diameters15″ – 20″16″ – 20″
Tread depth13/32″13/32″
UTQG560 A B660 A B
Treadwear warranty50,000 mi60,000 mi
SidewallOutlined White LetteringBlackwall
Max pressure44 psi51 psi
Sizes in common44

Which one should you actually buy?

Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10

Sumitomo Encounter AT

Too close to call: Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 and Sumitomo Encounter AT are within 2 points overall. Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 is stronger on treadwear and comfort. Sumitomo Encounter AT is stronger on snow.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 scores 71 vs 66 on treadwear.

Pick tire B You drive through snowy winters

Sumitomo Encounter AT scores 69 vs 65 on snow.

Pick tire A You want the most comfortable ride

Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 scores 72 vs 69 on comfort.

Tire A · Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Sumitomo Encounter AT
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

DynaPro A/TM RF10 or Encounter AT?

Which is better in the wet, DynaPro A/TM RF10 or Encounter AT?

Neither, by our numbers: 74 vs 75 on the wet score, within 3 points.

Which grips better on dry roads, DynaPro A/TM RF10 or Encounter AT?

Neither, by our numbers: 73 vs 73 on the dry score, within 3 points.

Which is better in snow, DynaPro A/TM RF10 or Encounter AT?

Sumitomo Encounter AT, 69 vs 65 on our snow score.

Which is quieter, DynaPro A/TM RF10 or Encounter AT?

Neither, by our numbers: 70 vs 68 on the noise score, within 3 points.

Which is more comfortable, DynaPro A/TM RF10 or Encounter AT?

Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10, 72 vs 69 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, DynaPro A/TM RF10 or Encounter AT?

Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10, 71 vs 66 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology