tirewheelguide

Yokohama Advan Neova AD08 looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.

Head-to-head Updated

Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 vs Yokohama Advan Neova AD08 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 186 + 31 owner reviews. How we score

Too close to call: DynaPro A/TM RF10 71, Advan Neova AD08 70.

Check price on Amazon · DynaPro A/TM RF10 Check price on Amazon · Advan Neova AD08
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 73

    Dry

    Advan Neova AD08 +2
    75
    Why this score
    SourceDynaPro A/TM RF10Advan Neova AD08
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 71 (est.)≈ 73 (est.)
    Reviews found online7780

    DynaPro A/TM RF10: 60% × 71.3 (est.) + 40% × 76.6 = 73

    Advan Neova AD08: 60% × 72.5 (est.) + 40% × 79.7 = 75

    No road tests of dry for DynaPro A/TM RF10. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

    No road tests of dry for Advan Neova AD08. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

  2. 74

    Wet

    DynaPro A/TM RF10 +5
    69
    Why this score
    SourceDynaPro A/TM RF10Advan Neova AD08
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 73 (est.)≈ 69 (est.)
    Reviews found online7569

    DynaPro A/TM RF10: 60% × 72.8 (est.) + 40% × 75.2 = 74

    Advan Neova AD08: 60% × 69.1 (est.) + 40% × 68.5 = 69

    No road tests of wet for DynaPro A/TM RF10. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

    No road tests of wet for Advan Neova AD08. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

  3. 65

    Snow

    Level
    65
    Why this score
    SourceDynaPro A/TM RF10Advan Neova AD08
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online6261

    DynaPro A/TM RF10: 60% × 67.1 (est.) + 40% × 61.6 = 65

    Advan Neova AD08: 60% × 67 (est.) + 40% × 61.3 = 65

    No road tests of snow for DynaPro A/TM RF10. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).

    No road tests of snow for Advan Neova AD08. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).

  4. 72

    Comfort

    DynaPro A/TM RF10 +4
    68
    Why this score
    SourceDynaPro A/TM RF10Advan Neova AD08
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 70 (est.)≈ 69 (est.)
    Reviews found online7567

    DynaPro A/TM RF10: 60% × 70.2 (est.) + 40% × 75.4 = 72

    Advan Neova AD08: 60% × 68.7 (est.) + 40% × 66.6 = 68

    No road tests of comfort for DynaPro A/TM RF10 or Advan Neova AD08. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 70

    Noise

    DynaPro A/TM RF10 +3
    67
    Why this score
    SourceDynaPro A/TM RF10Advan Neova AD08
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online7368

    DynaPro A/TM RF10: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 72.9 = 70

    Advan Neova AD08: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 67.8 = 67

    No road tests of noise for DynaPro A/TM RF10 or Advan Neova AD08. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 71

    Treadwear

    DynaPro A/TM RF10 +8
    63
    Why this score
    SourceDynaPro A/TM RF10Advan Neova AD08
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 69 (est.)≈ 64 (est.)
    Reviews found online7561

    DynaPro A/TM RF10: 60% × 68.6 (est.) + 40% × 75.3 = 71

    Advan Neova AD08: 60% × 64.3 (est.) + 40% × 61.2 = 63

    No road tests of treadwear for DynaPro A/TM RF10. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

    No road tests of treadwear for Advan Neova AD08. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

  7. 71

    Handling (owners)

    Advan Neova AD08 +8
    79
    Why this score
    SourceDynaPro A/TM RF10Advan Neova AD08
    Reviews found online7179
Scores at a glance
CategoryHankook DynaPro A/TM RF10Yokohama Advan Neova AD08
Relative Score 71 70
Dry 73 75
Wet 74 69
Snow 65 65
Comfort 72 68
Noise 70 67
Treadwear 71 63
Handling (owners) 71 79

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score

DynaPro A/TM RF10

Advan Neova AD08

The professional test results behind the scores

Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.

DisciplineCategoryDynaPro A/TM RF10Advan Neova AD08ΔHead-to-head
Also published by the testers (not in the score)
Overall Ranking Overall #4/5 2019 4x4 Australia All-Terrain Tire Test R17 #4/10 2014 EVO Max Performance Summer Tyre Test – Different tests

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A DynaPro A/TM RF10

Pros

  • Exceptional tread life and durability
  • Low road noise compared to other all-terrain tires
  • Strong value proposition and competitive pricing

Cons

  • Inconsistent traction on wet pavement and ice
  • Reports of sidewall vulnerability to punctures
  • Potential for increased fuel consumption
All owner themes in the DynaPro A/TM RF10 review

Tire B Advan Neova AD08

Pros

  • Phenomenal dry grip and cornering traction
  • Exceptional steering feedback and crisp response
  • Stiff, robust sidewall and carcass construction

Cons

  • Prone to overheating and rubber degradation/chunking during heavy track use
  • Reduced performance and aquaplaning tendencies in heavy standing water
  • Limited size availability for larger rims
All owner themes in the Advan Neova AD08 review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 B · Yokohama Advan Neova AD08
CategoryAll-Terrain tireSummer
Vehicle typeSUV and 4x4Passenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available29—
Rim diameters15″ – 20″—
Tread depth13/32″9/32″
UTQG560 A B180 A A
Treadwear warranty50,000 mi—
SidewallOutlined White LetteringBlackwall
Max pressure44 psi51 psi

Which one should you actually buy?

Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10

Yokohama Advan Neova AD08

Too close to call: Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 and Yokohama Advan Neova AD08 are within 2 points overall. Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 is stronger on treadwear, wet and comfort. Yokohama Advan Neova AD08 is stronger on handling.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 scores 71 vs 63 on treadwear.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Yokohama Advan Neova AD08 scores 79 vs 71 on handling.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 scores 74 vs 69 on wet.

Pick tire A You want the most comfortable ride

Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 scores 72 vs 68 on comfort.

Tire A · Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Yokohama Advan Neova AD08
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

DynaPro A/TM RF10 or Advan Neova AD08?

Which is better in the wet, DynaPro A/TM RF10 or Advan Neova AD08?

Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10, 74 vs 69 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, DynaPro A/TM RF10 or Advan Neova AD08?

Neither, by our numbers: 73 vs 75 on the dry score, within 3 points.

Which is better in snow, DynaPro A/TM RF10 or Advan Neova AD08?

Neither, by our numbers: 65 vs 65 on the snow score, within 3 points.

Which is quieter, DynaPro A/TM RF10 or Advan Neova AD08?

Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10, 70 vs 67 on our noise score.

Which is more comfortable, DynaPro A/TM RF10 or Advan Neova AD08?

Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10, 72 vs 68 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, DynaPro A/TM RF10 or Advan Neova AD08?

Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10, 71 vs 63 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology