tirewheelguide

Yokohama G012 A/T looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.

Head-to-head Updated

Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 vs Yokohama G012 A/T — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 186 + 4 owner reviews. How we score

Too close to call: DynaPro A/TM RF10 and G012 A/T are level at 73.

Check price on Amazon · DynaPro A/TM RF10 Check price on Amazon · G012 A/T
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Yokohama G012 A/T
Tire BYokohama

G012 A/T

All Season All Terrain and Off Road tires

Provisional

Tests – · none yet Owners 75 · 4 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 73

    Dry

    DynaPro A/TM RF10 +1
    72
    Why this score
    SourceDynaPro A/TM RF10G012 A/T
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 71 (est.)≈ 71 (est.)
    Reviews found online7775

    DynaPro A/TM RF10: 60% × 71.3 (est.) + 40% × 76.6 = 73

    G012 A/T: 60% × 70.5 (est.) + 40% × 74.7 = 72

    No road tests of dry for DynaPro A/TM RF10. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

    No road tests of dry for G012 A/T. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

  2. 74

    Wet

    G012 A/T +1
    75
    Why this score
    SourceDynaPro A/TM RF10G012 A/T
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 73 (est.)≈ 73 (est.)
    Reviews found online7576

    DynaPro A/TM RF10: 60% × 72.8 (est.) + 40% × 75.2 = 74

    G012 A/T: 60% × 73.5 (est.) + 40% × 76.4 = 75

    No road tests of wet for DynaPro A/TM RF10. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

    No road tests of wet for G012 A/T. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

  3. 65

    Snow

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceDynaPro A/TM RF10G012 A/T
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)–
    Reviews found online62–

    DynaPro A/TM RF10: 60% × 67.1 (est.) + 40% × 61.6 = 65

    No road tests of snow for DynaPro A/TM RF10. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).

  4. 72

    Comfort

    DynaPro A/TM RF10 +5
    67
    Why this score
    SourceDynaPro A/TM RF10G012 A/T
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 70 (est.)≈ 69 (est.)
    Reviews found online7566

    DynaPro A/TM RF10: 60% × 70.2 (est.) + 40% × 75.4 = 72

    G012 A/T: 60% × 68.6 (est.) + 40% × 65.8 = 67

    No road tests of comfort for DynaPro A/TM RF10 or G012 A/T. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 70

    Noise

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceDynaPro A/TM RF10G012 A/T
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)–
    Reviews found online73–

    DynaPro A/TM RF10: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 72.9 = 70

    No road tests of noise for DynaPro A/TM RF10. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 71

    Treadwear

    Level
    71
    Why this score
    SourceDynaPro A/TM RF10G012 A/T
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 69 (est.)≈ 68 (est.)
    Reviews found online7575

    DynaPro A/TM RF10: 60% × 68.6 (est.) + 40% × 75.3 = 71

    G012 A/T: 60% × 68.5 (est.) + 40% × 74.9 = 71

    No road tests of treadwear for DynaPro A/TM RF10. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

    No road tests of treadwear for G012 A/T. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

  7. 71

    Handling (owners)

    G012 A/T +4
    75
    Why this score
    SourceDynaPro A/TM RF10G012 A/T
    Reviews found online7175
Scores at a glance
CategoryHankook DynaPro A/TM RF10Yokohama G012 A/T
Relative Score 73 73
Dry 73 72
Wet 74 75
Snow 65 –
Comfort 72 67
Noise 70 –
Treadwear 71 71
Handling (owners) 71 75

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score

DynaPro A/TM RF10

G012 A/T

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A DynaPro A/TM RF10

Pros

  • Exceptional tread life and durability
  • Low road noise compared to other all-terrain tires
  • Strong value proposition and competitive pricing

Cons

  • Inconsistent traction on wet pavement and ice
  • Reports of sidewall vulnerability to punctures
  • Potential for increased fuel consumption
All owner themes in the DynaPro A/TM RF10 review

Tire B G012 A/T

Pros

  • Exceptional tread life and long-term durability, with some users reporting up to 90,000 km and more
  • Strong off-road capability with solid shoulders and reliable performance on unsealed roads, farm tracks, mud, and sand
  • Excellent snow and winter weather performance, greatly enhancing 4WD and AWD capabilities

Cons

  • Reduced traction requiring extra caution during the initial onset of rain on wet roads
  • Stiffness in temperatures below 2 degrees Celsius affecting cold-weather and snow handling
  • Slight compromises in road noise and fuel consumption compared to standard road tires
All owner themes in the G012 A/T review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 B · Yokohama G012 A/T
CategoryAll-Terrain tireAll Season All Terrain and Off Road tires
Vehicle typeSUV and 4x4SUV and 4x4
Sizes available29—
Rim diameters15″ – 20″—
Tread depth13/32″—
UTQG560 A B—
Treadwear warranty50,000 mi—
SidewallOutlined White Lettering—
Max pressure44 psi—

Which one should you actually buy?

Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10

Yokohama G012 A/T

Too close to call: Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 and Yokohama G012 A/T are within 2 points overall. Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 is stronger on comfort. Yokohama G012 A/T rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 4 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire A You want the most comfortable ride

Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 scores 72 vs 67 on comfort.

Tire A · Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Yokohama G012 A/T
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

DynaPro A/TM RF10 or G012 A/T?

Which is better in the wet, DynaPro A/TM RF10 or G012 A/T?

Neither, by our numbers: 74 vs 75 on the wet score, within 3 points.

Which grips better on dry roads, DynaPro A/TM RF10 or G012 A/T?

Neither, by our numbers: 73 vs 72 on the dry score, within 3 points.

Which is more comfortable, DynaPro A/TM RF10 or G012 A/T?

Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10, 72 vs 67 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, DynaPro A/TM RF10 or G012 A/T?

Neither, by our numbers: 71 vs 71 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology