tirewheelguide
Head-to-head Updated

Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 vs Yokohama Geolandar SUV — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 186 + 5 owner reviews. How we score

DynaPro A/TM RF10 leads, 73–69 Narrow edge

Check price on Amazon · DynaPro A/TM RF10 or Geolandar SUV on Amazon
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 73

    Dry

    DynaPro A/TM RF10 +5
    68
    Why this score
    SourceDynaPro A/TM RF10Geolandar SUV
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 71 (est.)≈ 68 (est.)
    Reviews found online7768

    DynaPro A/TM RF10: 60% × 71.3 (est.) + 40% × 76.6 = 73

    Geolandar SUV: 60% × 68 (est.) + 40% × 68.4 = 68

    No road tests of dry for DynaPro A/TM RF10. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

    No road tests of dry for Geolandar SUV. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

  2. 74

    Wet

    DynaPro A/TM RF10 +2
    72
    Why this score
    SourceDynaPro A/TM RF10Geolandar SUV
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 73 (est.)≈ 71 (est.)
    Reviews found online7573

    DynaPro A/TM RF10: 60% × 72.8 (est.) + 40% × 75.2 = 74

    Geolandar SUV: 60% × 71.4 (est.) + 40% × 72.6 = 72

    No road tests of wet for DynaPro A/TM RF10. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

    No road tests of wet for Geolandar SUV. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

  3. 65

    Snow

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceDynaPro A/TM RF10Geolandar SUV
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)–
    Reviews found online62–

    DynaPro A/TM RF10: 60% × 67.1 (est.) + 40% × 61.6 = 65

    No road tests of snow for DynaPro A/TM RF10. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).

  4. 72

    Comfort

    DynaPro A/TM RF10 +7
    65
    Why this score
    SourceDynaPro A/TM RF10Geolandar SUV
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 70 (est.)≈ 68 (est.)
    Reviews found online7561

    DynaPro A/TM RF10: 60% × 70.2 (est.) + 40% × 75.4 = 72

    Geolandar SUV: 60% × 67.8 (est.) + 40% × 61.4 = 65

    No road tests of comfort for DynaPro A/TM RF10 or Geolandar SUV. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 70

    Noise

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceDynaPro A/TM RF10Geolandar SUV
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)–
    Reviews found online73–

    DynaPro A/TM RF10: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 72.9 = 70

    No road tests of noise for DynaPro A/TM RF10. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 71

    Treadwear

    DynaPro A/TM RF10 +6
    65
    Why this score
    SourceDynaPro A/TM RF10Geolandar SUV
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 69 (est.)≈ 65 (est.)
    Reviews found online7565

    DynaPro A/TM RF10: 60% × 68.6 (est.) + 40% × 75.3 = 71

    Geolandar SUV: 60% × 65.4 (est.) + 40% × 64.8 = 65

    No road tests of treadwear for DynaPro A/TM RF10. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

    No road tests of treadwear for Geolandar SUV. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

  7. 71

    Handling (owners)

    DynaPro A/TM RF10 +1
    70
    Why this score
    SourceDynaPro A/TM RF10Geolandar SUV
    Reviews found online7170
Scores at a glance
CategoryHankook DynaPro A/TM RF10Yokohama Geolandar SUV
Relative Score 73 69
Dry 73 68
Wet 74 72
Snow 65 –
Comfort 72 65
Noise 70 –
Treadwear 71 65
Handling (owners) 71 70

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score

DynaPro A/TM RF10

Geolandar SUV

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

The professional test results behind the scores

Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.

DisciplineCategoryDynaPro A/TM RF10Geolandar SUVΔHead-to-head
Also published by the testers (not in the score)
Overall Ranking Overall #4/5 2019 4x4 Australia All-Terrain Tire Test R17 #15/15 2017 ADAC SUV Summer Tyre Test – Different tests

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A DynaPro A/TM RF10

Pros

  • Exceptional tread life and durability
  • Low road noise compared to other all-terrain tires
  • Strong value proposition and competitive pricing

Cons

  • Inconsistent traction on wet pavement and ice
  • Reports of sidewall vulnerability to punctures
  • Potential for increased fuel consumption
All owner themes in the DynaPro A/TM RF10 review

Tire B Geolandar SUV

Pros

  • Exceptional tread longevity and durability
  • High level of ride comfort
  • Strong structural integrity against road hazards like potholes

Cons

  • Poor grip and traction in wet weather conditions
  • Not suitable for high-performance driving
  • Lack of confidence-inspiring handling during cornering in rain
All owner themes in the Geolandar SUV review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 B · Yokohama Geolandar SUV
CategoryAll-Terrain tireSummer
Vehicle typeSUV and 4x4SUV and 4x4
Sizes available29—
Rim diameters15″ – 20″—
Tread depth13/32″—
UTQG560 A B—
Treadwear warranty50,000 mi—
SidewallOutlined White Lettering—
Max pressure44 psi—

Which one should you actually buy?

Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10

Yokohama Geolandar SUV

Narrow edge: Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 — better comfort, treadwear and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score. Yokohama Geolandar SUV rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 5 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire A You want the most comfortable ride

Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 scores 72 vs 65 on comfort.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 scores 71 vs 65 on treadwear.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 scores 73 vs 68 on dry.

Tire A · Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Yokohama Geolandar SUV
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

DynaPro A/TM RF10 or Geolandar SUV?

Which is better in the wet, DynaPro A/TM RF10 or Geolandar SUV?

Neither, by our numbers: 74 vs 72 on the wet score, within 3 points.

Which grips better on dry roads, DynaPro A/TM RF10 or Geolandar SUV?

Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10, 73 vs 68 on our dry score.

Which is more comfortable, DynaPro A/TM RF10 or Geolandar SUV?

Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10, 72 vs 65 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, DynaPro A/TM RF10 or Geolandar SUV?

Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10, 71 vs 65 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology