Nexen N3000 looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.

Head-to-head Updated

Hankook Dynapro HP RA23 vs Nexen N3000 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 16 + 73 owner reviews. How we score

Dynapro HP RA23 is ahead, 69–53

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Nexen N3000
Tire BNexen

N3000

Summer

± 7

Tests – · none yet Owners 45 · 73 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 70

    Dry

    Dynapro HP RA23 +18
    52
    Why this score
    SourceDynapro HP RA23N3000
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 69 (est.)≈ 58 (est.)
    Reviews found online7143

    Dynapro HP RA23: 60% × 69.2 (est.) + 40% × 70.9 = 70

    N3000: 60% × 57.7 (est.) + 40% × 43.1 = 52

    No road tests of dry for Dynapro HP RA23. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

    No road tests of dry for N3000. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

  2. 71

    Wet

    Dynapro HP RA23 +17
    54
    Why this score
    SourceDynapro HP RA23N3000
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 71 (est.)≈ 58 (est.)
    Reviews found online7148

    Dynapro HP RA23: 60% × 70.9 (est.) + 40% × 71.1 = 71

    N3000: 60% × 58 (est.) + 40% × 47.5 = 54

    No road tests of wet for Dynapro HP RA23. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

    No road tests of wet for N3000. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 65

    Snow

    Dynapro HP RA23 +16
    49
    Why this score
    SourceDynapro HP RA23N3000
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 68 (est.)≈ 59 (est.)
    Reviews found online6134

    Dynapro HP RA23: 60% × 67.5 (est.) + 40% × 61.1 = 65

    N3000: 60% × 58.9 (est.) + 40% × 34 = 49

    No road tests of snow for Dynapro HP RA23. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

    No road tests of snow for N3000. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

  4. 71

    Comfort

    Dynapro HP RA23 +16
    55
    Why this score
    SourceDynapro HP RA23N3000
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 69 (est.)≈ 65 (est.)
    Reviews found online7249

    Dynapro HP RA23: 40% × 69.3 (est.) + 60% × 72.1 = 71

    N3000: 40% × 64.6 (est.) + 60% × 48.5 = 55

    No road tests of comfort for Dynapro HP RA23. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

    No road tests of comfort for N3000. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

  5. 66

    Noise

    Dynapro HP RA23 +7
    59
    Why this score
    SourceDynapro HP RA23N3000
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 66 (est.)≈ 66 (est.)
    Reviews found online6649

    Dynapro HP RA23: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 65.9 = 66

    N3000: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 48.8 = 59

    No road tests of noise for Dynapro HP RA23 or N3000. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 70

    Treadwear

    Dynapro HP RA23 +15
    55
    Why this score
    SourceDynapro HP RA23N3000
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 68 (est.)≈ 60 (est.)
    Reviews found online7248

    Dynapro HP RA23: 60% × 68.3 (est.) + 40% × 71.5 = 70

    N3000: 60% × 59.9 (est.) + 40% × 48.3 = 55

    No road tests of treadwear for Dynapro HP RA23. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

    No road tests of treadwear for N3000. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

  7. 71

    Handling (owners)

    Dynapro HP RA23 +27
    44
    Why this score
    SourceDynapro HP RA23N3000
    Reviews found online7144
Scores at a glance
Hankook Dynapro HP RA23 vs Nexen N3000: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryHankook Dynapro HP RA23Nexen N3000
Relative Score 69 53
Dry 70 52
Wet 71 54
Snow 65 49
Comfort 71 55
Noise 66 59
Treadwear 70 55
Handling (owners) 71 44

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 8

Dynapro HP RA23

± 7

N3000

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Dynapro HP RA23

Pros

  • Exceptional tread wear and long lifespan
  • Whisper-quiet and comfortable ride quality
  • Good overall grip and braking in dry and wet conditions

Cons

  • Potential for sudden understeer in wet conditions during aggressive cornering
  • Mixed feedback regarding ride comfort from a small subset of users
  • Limited ice traction compared to dedicated winter tires
All owner themes in the Dynapro HP RA23 review

Tire B N3000

Pros

  • Outstanding dry road traction and handling
  • Highly competitive, budget-friendly pricing
  • Attractive and aggressive V-shaped tread design with rim protectors

Cons

  • Significantly degraded or untrustworthy wet weather grip
  • Faster-than-expected or uneven tread wear for some users
  • Sidewall cracking, bubbling, or structural failure under duress
All owner themes in the N3000 review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Hankook Dynapro HP RA23 B · Nexen N3000
CategorySummerSummer
Vehicle typeSUV and 4x4Passenger Car / Crossover
Tread depth—10/32″
UTQG—340 A A
Treadwear warranty—35,000 mi
SidewallBlackwallBlackwall
Max pressure—50 psi

Which one should you actually buy?

Hankook Dynapro HP RA23

Nexen N3000

Winner: Hankook Dynapro HP RA23 — better handling, dry and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score. Hankook Dynapro HP RA23 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 16 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Hankook Dynapro HP RA23 scores 71 vs 44 on handling.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

Hankook Dynapro HP RA23 scores 70 vs 52 on dry.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Hankook Dynapro HP RA23 scores 71 vs 54 on wet.

Pick tire A You drive through snowy winters

Hankook Dynapro HP RA23 scores 65 vs 49 on snow.

Tire A · Hankook Dynapro HP RA23
Tire B · Nexen N3000

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Dynapro HP RA23 or N3000?

Which is better in the wet, Dynapro HP RA23 or N3000?

Hankook Dynapro HP RA23, 71 vs 54 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Dynapro HP RA23 or N3000?

Hankook Dynapro HP RA23, 70 vs 52 on our dry score.

Which is better in snow, Dynapro HP RA23 or N3000?

Hankook Dynapro HP RA23, 65 vs 49 on our snow score.

Which is quieter, Dynapro HP RA23 or N3000?

Hankook Dynapro HP RA23, 66 vs 59 on our noise score.

Which is more comfortable, Dynapro HP RA23 or N3000?

Hankook Dynapro HP RA23, 71 vs 55 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Dynapro HP RA23 or N3000?

Hankook Dynapro HP RA23, 70 vs 55 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology