Tests – · none yet Owners 47 · 73 reviews
Nexen N3000 vs Nexen CP672 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): 60% professional tests, 40% owner reviews.
CP672 is ahead, 67–54
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
53
Dry
CP672 +1366Why this score
Source N3000 CP672 Reviews found online 46 66 -
55
Wet
CP672 +1368Why this score
Source N3000 CP672 Reviews found online 49 67 -
49
Snow
CP672 +1968Why this score
Source N3000 CP672 Reviews found online 36 67 -
61
Comfort
CP672 +667Why this score
Source N3000 CP672 Reviews found online 52 65 -
61
Noise
CP672 +768Why this score
Source N3000 CP672 Reviews found online 52 71 -
57
Treadwear
CP672 +966Why this score
Source N3000 CP672 Reviews found online 51 67 -
47
Handling
CP672 +1865Why this score
Source N3000 CP672 Reviews found online 47 65
Scores at a glance
| Category | Nexen N3000 | Nexen CP672 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 54 | 67 |
| Dry | 53 | 66 |
| Wet | 55 | 68 |
| Snow | 49 | 68 |
| Comfort | 61 | 67 |
| Noise | 61 | 68 |
| Treadwear | 57 | 66 |
| Handling | 47 | 65 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
N3000
CP672
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A N3000
Pros
- Outstanding dry road traction and handling
- Highly competitive, budget-friendly pricing
- Attractive and aggressive V-shaped tread design with rim protectors
Cons
- Significantly degraded or untrustworthy wet weather grip
- Faster-than-expected or uneven tread wear for some users
- Sidewall cracking, bubbling, or structural failure under duress
Tire B CP672
Pros
- Exceptional price-to-performance ratio and overall affordability
- Low road noise providing a smooth, quiet, and comfortable ride
- Impressive tread life and long-term durability
Cons
- Subpar wet traction and occasional wheel spin reported by some drivers
- Minor initial squishiness or lack of sharp initial steering bite on tight turns
- Potential for accelerated shoulder wear if wheel alignment is not meticulously maintained
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Nexen N3000 | B · Nexen CP672 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | All Season |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | — | 41 |
| Rim diameters | — | 14″ – 18″ |
| Tread depth | 10/32″ | 9/32″ |
| UTQG | 340 A A | 460 A A |
| Treadwear warranty | 35,000 mi | 70,000 mi |
| Sidewall | Blackwall | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | 50 psi | 44 psi |
Which one should you actually buy?
Nexen N3000
Nexen CP672
Winner: Nexen CP672 — better snow, handling and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Nexen CP672 scores 68 vs 49 on snow.
Nexen CP672 scores 65 vs 47 on handling.
Nexen CP672 scores 66 vs 53 on dry.
Nexen CP672 scores 68 vs 55 on wet.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.