Tests – · none yet Owners 63 · 7 reviews
Head-to-head
Updated
Hankook Dynapro HP vs Kumho Ecsta PS31 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 7 + 259 owner reviews. How we score
Ecsta PS31 leads, 66–64 Narrow edge
Add your size for an exact match
/R
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 63 · 259 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
62
Dry
Ecsta PS31 +365Why this score
Source Dynapro HP Ecsta PS31 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 64 (est.) ≈ 66 (est.) Reviews found online 59 63 Dynapro HP: 60% × 64.2 (est.) + 40% × 59 = 62
Ecsta PS31: 60% × 65.9 (est.) + 40% × 63.1 = 65
No road tests of dry for Dynapro HP. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
No road tests of dry for Ecsta PS31. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
-
68
Wet
Level68Why this score
Source Dynapro HP Ecsta PS31 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 68 (est.) ≈ 69 (est.) Reviews found online 67 68 Dynapro HP: 60% × 68.1 (est.) + 40% × 66.7 = 68
Ecsta PS31: 60% × 68.8 (est.) + 40% × 68 = 68
No road tests of wet for Dynapro HP. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
No road tests of wet for Ecsta PS31. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
-
–
Snow
No comparison57Why this score
Source Dynapro HP Ecsta PS31 Professional tests (TWG score) – ≈ 63 (est.) Reviews found online – 49 Ecsta PS31: 60% × 62.9 (est.) + 40% × 48.8 = 57
No road tests of snow for Ecsta PS31. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).
-
65
Comfort
Ecsta PS31 +267Why this score
Source Dynapro HP Ecsta PS31 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 68 (est.) ≈ 68 (est.) Reviews found online 61 65 Dynapro HP: 60% × 67.7 (est.) + 40% × 60.7 = 65
Ecsta PS31: 60% × 68.4 (est.) + 40% × 65 = 67
No road tests of comfort for Dynapro HP or Ecsta PS31. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
–
Noise
No comparison67Why this score
Source Dynapro HP Ecsta PS31 Professional tests (TWG score) – ≈ 67 (est.) Reviews found online – 67 Ecsta PS31: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 67 = 67
No road tests of noise for Ecsta PS31. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
65
Treadwear
Level65Why this score
Source Dynapro HP Ecsta PS31 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 65 (est.) ≈ 65 (est.) Reviews found online 65 65 Dynapro HP: 60% × 65.3 (est.) + 40% × 64.7 = 65
Ecsta PS31: 60% × 65.3 (est.) + 40% × 64.7 = 65
No road tests of treadwear for Dynapro HP. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
No road tests of treadwear for Ecsta PS31. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
-
57
Handling (owners)
Ecsta PS31 +1067Why this score
Source Dynapro HP Ecsta PS31 Reviews found online 57 67
Scores at a glance
| Category | Hankook Dynapro HP | Kumho Ecsta PS31 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 64 | 66 |
| Dry | 62 | 65 |
| Wet | 68 | 68 |
| Snow | – | 57 |
| Comfort | 65 | 67 |
| Noise | – | 67 |
| Treadwear | 65 | 65 |
| Handling (owners) | 57 | 67 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
64
/ 100
Dynapro HP
66
/ 100
Ecsta PS31
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Dynapro HP
Pros
- Impressive long-term durability and high mileage potential (up to 68,000 miles reported)
- Stable performance for motorway travel and holiday towing under normal conditions
- Consistent and even wear reported over extended periods (e.g., 40,000 km)
Cons
- Extreme and premature front tire degradation, including uneven wear and a melted appearance at very low mileage
- Lack of traction on soft or slippery surfaces like wet grass
- Reduced performance and confidence when towing heavier loads such as a caravan
Tire B Ecsta PS31
Pros
- Excellent price-to-performance ratio
- High levels of ride comfort and low road noise
- Strong dry traction for daily and spirited street driving
Cons
- Soft sidewalls lead to vague steering response and 'squirm' during aggressive maneuvers
- Inconsistent wet weather performance reported by some users, particularly in deep standing water
- Tread life can be shorter than expected for some driving styles
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Hankook Dynapro HP | B · Kumho Ecsta PS31 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | SUV and 4x4 | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 14 | 21 |
| Rim diameters | 16″ – 18″ | 15″ – 18″ |
| Tread depth | — | 10/32″ |
| UTQG | — | 460 A A |
| Sidewall | — | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | — | 51 psi |
| Sizes in common | 1 | 1 |
Which one should you actually buy?
64
/ 100
Hankook Dynapro HP
66
/ 100
Kumho Ecsta PS31
Narrow edge: Kumho Ecsta PS31 — better handling and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score. Hankook Dynapro HP rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 7 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Pick tire B
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Kumho Ecsta PS31 scores 67 vs 57 on handling.
Pick tire B
You want the most grip on dry roads
Kumho Ecsta PS31 scores 65 vs 62 on dry.
Tire A · Hankook Dynapro HP
Tire B · Kumho Ecsta PS31
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Dynapro HP or Ecsta PS31?
Which is better in the wet, Dynapro HP or Ecsta PS31?
Neither, by our numbers: 68 vs 68 on the wet score, within 3 points.
Which grips better on dry roads, Dynapro HP or Ecsta PS31?
Kumho Ecsta PS31, 65 vs 62 on our dry score.
Which is more comfortable, Dynapro HP or Ecsta PS31?
Neither, by our numbers: 65 vs 67 on the comfort score, within 3 points.
Which lasts longer, Dynapro HP or Ecsta PS31?
Neither, by our numbers: 65 vs 65 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology