Tests – · none yet Owners 63 · 7 reviews
Hankook Dynapro HP vs Michelin Latitude Tour — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 7 + 9 owner reviews. How we score
Latitude Tour leads, 68–64 Narrow edge
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 66 · 9 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
62
Dry
Latitude Tour +769Why this score
Source Dynapro HP Latitude Tour Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 64 (est.) ≈ 68 (est.) Reviews found online 59 70 Dynapro HP: 60% × 64.2 (est.) + 40% × 59 = 62
Latitude Tour: 60% × 68.4 (est.) + 40% × 69.5 = 69
No road tests of dry for Dynapro HP. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
No road tests of dry for Latitude Tour. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
-
68
Wet
Latitude Tour +270Why this score
Source Dynapro HP Latitude Tour Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 68 (est.) ≈ 70 (est.) Reviews found online 67 70 Dynapro HP: 60% × 68.1 (est.) + 40% × 66.7 = 68
Latitude Tour: 60% × 69.6 (est.) + 40% × 69.5 = 70
No road tests of wet for Dynapro HP. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
No road tests of wet for Latitude Tour. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
-
–
Snow
No comparison66Why this score
Source Dynapro HP Latitude Tour Professional tests (TWG score) – ≈ 68 (est.) Reviews found online – 63 Latitude Tour: 60% × 67.5 (est.) + 40% × 62.8 = 66
No road tests of snow for Latitude Tour. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).
-
65
Comfort
Latitude Tour +166Why this score
Source Dynapro HP Latitude Tour Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 68 (est.) ≈ 68 (est.) Reviews found online 61 64 Dynapro HP: 60% × 67.7 (est.) + 40% × 60.7 = 65
Latitude Tour: 60% × 68.2 (est.) + 40% × 63.8 = 66
No road tests of comfort for Dynapro HP or Latitude Tour. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
65
Treadwear
Level65Why this score
Source Dynapro HP Latitude Tour Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 65 (est.) ≈ 65 (est.) Reviews found online 65 64 Dynapro HP: 60% × 65.3 (est.) + 40% × 64.7 = 65
Latitude Tour: 60% × 65.2 (est.) + 40% × 64.3 = 65
No road tests of treadwear for Dynapro HP. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
No road tests of treadwear for Latitude Tour. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
-
57
Handling (owners)
Latitude Tour +562Why this score
Source Dynapro HP Latitude Tour Reviews found online 57 62
Scores at a glance
| Category | Hankook Dynapro HP | Michelin Latitude Tour |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 64 | 68 |
| Dry | 62 | 69 |
| Wet | 68 | 70 |
| Snow | – | 66 |
| Comfort | 65 | 66 |
| Treadwear | 65 | 65 |
| Handling (owners) | 57 | 62 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Dynapro HP
Latitude Tour
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Dynapro HP
Pros
- Impressive long-term durability and high mileage potential (up to 68,000 miles reported)
- Stable performance for motorway travel and holiday towing under normal conditions
- Consistent and even wear reported over extended periods (e.g., 40,000 km)
Cons
- Extreme and premature front tire degradation, including uneven wear and a melted appearance at very low mileage
- Lack of traction on soft or slippery surfaces like wet grass
- Reduced performance and confidence when towing heavier loads such as a caravan
Tire B Latitude Tour
Pros
- Exceptional tread longevity and durability
- Very low road noise levels
- Smooth and comfortable ride quality
Cons
- Stiff ride characteristics, particularly in colder temperatures
- Inconsistent tread wear patterns, including premature flaking
- Limited performance in true winter conditions despite M+S rating
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Hankook Dynapro HP | B · Michelin Latitude Tour |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | All Season |
| Vehicle type | SUV and 4x4 | SUV and 4x4 |
| Sizes available | 14 | 1 |
| Rim diameters | 16″ – 18″ | 17″ |
Which one should you actually buy?
Hankook Dynapro HP
Michelin Latitude Tour
Narrow edge: Michelin Latitude Tour — better dry. It leads or ties in every category we score. Hankook Dynapro HP rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 7 reviews), so read this result as provisional. Michelin Latitude Tour rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 9 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Michelin Latitude Tour scores 69 vs 62 on dry.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Dynapro HP or Latitude Tour?
Which is better in the wet, Dynapro HP or Latitude Tour?
Neither, by our numbers: 68 vs 70 on the wet score, within 3 points.
Which grips better on dry roads, Dynapro HP or Latitude Tour?
Michelin Latitude Tour, 69 vs 62 on our dry score.
Which is more comfortable, Dynapro HP or Latitude Tour?
Neither, by our numbers: 65 vs 66 on the comfort score, within 3 points.
Which lasts longer, Dynapro HP or Latitude Tour?
Neither, by our numbers: 65 vs 65 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology