Tests – · none yet Owners 63 · 7 reviews
Hankook Dynapro HP vs Yokohama BluEarth XT AE61 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 2 road tests and 7 + 11 owner reviews. How we score
BluEarth XT AE61 is ahead, 71–64
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 66 · 2 tests Owners 78 · 11 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 8 in 2025 EV Tyre Test (noise)
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
62
Dry
BluEarth XT AE61 +1375Why this score
Source Dynapro HP BluEarth XT AE61 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 2 tests ≈ 64 (est.) 70 Reviews found online 59 83 Dynapro HP: 60% × 64.2 (est.) + 40% × 59 = 62
BluEarth XT AE61: 60% × 70.4 + 40% × 82.8 = 75
No road tests of dry for Dynapro HP. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
-
68
Wet
BluEarth XT AE61 +472Why this score
Source Dynapro HP BluEarth XT AE61 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 2 tests ≈ 68 (est.) 68 Reviews found online 67 80 Dynapro HP: 60% × 68.1 (est.) + 40% × 66.7 = 68
BluEarth XT AE61: 60% × 67.6 + 40% × 79.5 = 72
No road tests of wet for Dynapro HP. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
-
65
Comfort
BluEarth XT AE61 +166Why this score
Source Dynapro HP BluEarth XT AE61 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 2 tests ≈ 68 (est.) 65 Reviews found online 61 68 Dynapro HP: 60% × 67.7 (est.) + 40% × 60.7 = 65
BluEarth XT AE61: 60% × 64.7 + 40% × 68.1 = 66
No road tests of comfort for Dynapro HP. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
–
Noise
No comparison79Why this score
Source Dynapro HP BluEarth XT AE61 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 2 tests – 87 Reviews found online – ≈ 67 (est.) BluEarth XT AE61: 60% × 86.6 + 40% × 67.3 (est.) = 79
No owner ratings of noise for BluEarth XT AE61. The owner half is the owners’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.
-
65
Treadwear
Dynapro HP +362Why this score
Source Dynapro HP BluEarth XT AE61 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests ≈ 65 (est.) 53 Reviews found online 65 75 Dynapro HP: 60% × 65.3 (est.) + 40% × 64.7 = 65
BluEarth XT AE61: 60% × 52.8 + 40% × 75.4 = 62
No road tests of treadwear for Dynapro HP. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
-
57
Handling (owners)
BluEarth XT AE61 +2380Why this score
Source Dynapro HP BluEarth XT AE61 Reviews found online 57 80
Scores at a glance
| Category | Hankook Dynapro HP | Yokohama BluEarth XT AE61 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 64 | 71 |
| Dry | 62 | 75 |
| Wet | 68 | 72 |
| Comfort | 65 | 66 |
| Noise | – | 79 |
| Treadwear | 65 | 62 |
| Handling (owners) | 57 | 80 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Dynapro HP
BluEarth XT AE61
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Dynapro HP
Pros
- Impressive long-term durability and high mileage potential (up to 68,000 miles reported)
- Stable performance for motorway travel and holiday towing under normal conditions
- Consistent and even wear reported over extended periods (e.g., 40,000 km)
Cons
- Extreme and premature front tire degradation, including uneven wear and a melted appearance at very low mileage
- Lack of traction on soft or slippery surfaces like wet grass
- Reduced performance and confidence when towing heavier loads such as a caravan
Tire B BluEarth XT AE61
Pros
- Excellent grip and braking performance in both wet and dry conditions
- Responsive and sharp steering handling
- High stability during cornering due to rigid sidewall construction
Cons
- Noticeable cabin noise, particularly on aged or rough road surfaces
- Stiff sidewall construction results in a harsh ride on bumpy or unpaved roads
- Comfort levels are highly dependent on road surface quality
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Hankook Dynapro HP | B · Yokohama BluEarth XT AE61 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | SUV and 4x4 | SUV and 4x4 |
| Sizes available | 14 | 38 |
| Rim diameters | 16″ – 18″ | 16″ – 20″ |
| Sizes in common | 6 | 6 |
Which one should you actually buy?
Hankook Dynapro HP
Yokohama BluEarth XT AE61
Winner: Yokohama BluEarth XT AE61 — better handling, dry and wet. Pick the Hankook Dynapro HP if treadwear matters most to you. Hankook Dynapro HP rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 7 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Yokohama BluEarth XT AE61 scores 80 vs 57 on handling.
Yokohama BluEarth XT AE61 scores 75 vs 62 on dry.
Yokohama BluEarth XT AE61 scores 72 vs 68 on wet.
Hankook Dynapro HP scores 65 vs 62 on treadwear.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Dynapro HP or BluEarth XT AE61?
Which is better in the wet, Dynapro HP or BluEarth XT AE61?
Yokohama BluEarth XT AE61, 72 vs 68 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Dynapro HP or BluEarth XT AE61?
Yokohama BluEarth XT AE61, 75 vs 62 on our dry score.
Which is more comfortable, Dynapro HP or BluEarth XT AE61?
Neither, by our numbers: 65 vs 66 on the comfort score, within 3 points.
Which lasts longer, Dynapro HP or BluEarth XT AE61?
Hankook Dynapro HP, 65 vs 62 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology