Tests – · none yet Owners 63 · 7 reviews
Hankook Dynapro HP vs Yokohama Geolandar G98A — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 7 + 15 owner reviews. How we score
Dynapro HP is ahead, 64–55
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 47 · 15 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
62
Dry
Dynapro HP +656Why this score
Source Dynapro HP Geolandar G98A Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 64 (est.) ≈ 60 (est.) Reviews found online 59 49 Dynapro HP: 60% × 64.2 (est.) + 40% × 59 = 62
Geolandar G98A: 60% × 60.2 (est.) + 40% × 49.1 = 56
No road tests of dry for Dynapro HP. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
No road tests of dry for Geolandar G98A. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
-
68
Wet
Dynapro HP +959Why this score
Source Dynapro HP Geolandar G98A Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 68 (est.) ≈ 62 (est.) Reviews found online 67 55 Dynapro HP: 60% × 68.1 (est.) + 40% × 66.7 = 68
Geolandar G98A: 60% × 61.6 (est.) + 40% × 55.2 = 59
No road tests of wet for Dynapro HP. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
No road tests of wet for Geolandar G98A. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
-
65
Comfort
Dynapro HP +857Why this score
Source Dynapro HP Geolandar G98A Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 68 (est.) ≈ 65 (est.) Reviews found online 61 45 Dynapro HP: 60% × 67.7 (est.) + 40% × 60.7 = 65
Geolandar G98A: 60% × 65 (est.) + 40% × 45.2 = 57
No road tests of comfort for Dynapro HP or Geolandar G98A. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
65
Treadwear
Dynapro HP +1748Why this score
Source Dynapro HP Geolandar G98A Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 65 (est.) ≈ 56 (est.) Reviews found online 65 36 Dynapro HP: 60% × 65.3 (est.) + 40% × 64.7 = 65
Geolandar G98A: 60% × 56.4 (est.) + 40% × 35.7 = 48
No road tests of treadwear for Dynapro HP. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
No road tests of treadwear for Geolandar G98A. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
-
57
Handling (owners)
Dynapro HP +651Why this score
Source Dynapro HP Geolandar G98A Reviews found online 57 51
Scores at a glance
| Category | Hankook Dynapro HP | Yokohama Geolandar G98A |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 64 | 55 |
| Dry | 62 | 56 |
| Wet | 68 | 59 |
| Comfort | 65 | 57 |
| Treadwear | 65 | 48 |
| Handling (owners) | 57 | 51 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Dynapro HP
Geolandar G98A
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Dynapro HP
Pros
- Impressive long-term durability and high mileage potential (up to 68,000 miles reported)
- Stable performance for motorway travel and holiday towing under normal conditions
- Consistent and even wear reported over extended periods (e.g., 40,000 km)
Cons
- Extreme and premature front tire degradation, including uneven wear and a melted appearance at very low mileage
- Lack of traction on soft or slippery surfaces like wet grass
- Reduced performance and confidence when towing heavier loads such as a caravan
Tire B Geolandar G98A
Pros
- Satisfactory dry-road grip and handling
- Quiet and comfortable ride quality
- Decent fuel efficiency
Cons
- Significantly premature tread wear
- Poor traction and instability in wet conditions
- Unsafe performance in snow and icy environments
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Hankook Dynapro HP | B · Yokohama Geolandar G98A |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | SUV and 4x4 | SUV and 4x4 |
| Sizes available | 14 | — |
| Rim diameters | 16″ – 18″ | — |
Which one should you actually buy?
Hankook Dynapro HP
Yokohama Geolandar G98A
Winner: Hankook Dynapro HP — better treadwear, wet and comfort. It leads or ties in every category we score. Hankook Dynapro HP rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 7 reviews), so read this result as provisional. Yokohama Geolandar G98A rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 15 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Hankook Dynapro HP scores 65 vs 48 on treadwear.
Hankook Dynapro HP scores 68 vs 59 on wet.
Hankook Dynapro HP scores 65 vs 57 on comfort.
Hankook Dynapro HP scores 62 vs 56 on dry.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Dynapro HP or Geolandar G98A?
Which is better in the wet, Dynapro HP or Geolandar G98A?
Hankook Dynapro HP, 68 vs 59 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Dynapro HP or Geolandar G98A?
Hankook Dynapro HP, 62 vs 56 on our dry score.
Which is more comfortable, Dynapro HP or Geolandar G98A?
Hankook Dynapro HP, 65 vs 57 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Dynapro HP or Geolandar G98A?
Hankook Dynapro HP, 65 vs 48 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology