Head-to-head Updated

Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33 vs Hankook Winter i*cept evo — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): 60% professional tests, 40% owner reviews.

Dynapro HP2 RA33 leads, 74–70 Narrow edge

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Tire AHankook

Dynapro HP2 RA33

Summer

Tests – · none yet Owners 77 · 67 reviews

Best test result: #5 of 6 in 2016 Off Road Summer SUV Tyre Test (overall ranking)

Tire BHankook

Winter i*cept evo

Winter

Tests – · none yet Owners 72 · 28 reviews

Best test result: #5 of 7 in 2011 Auto Bild Performance Winter Tyre Test (overall ranking)

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 75

    Dry

    Dynapro HP2 RA33 +7
    68
    Why this score
    SourceDynapro HP2 RA33Winter i*cept evo
    Reviews found online7968
  2. 78

    Wet

    Dynapro HP2 RA33 +5
    73
    Why this score
    SourceDynapro HP2 RA33Winter i*cept evo
    Reviews found online8074
  3. 68

    Snow

    Winter i*cept evo +8
    76
    Why this score
    SourceDynapro HP2 RA33Winter i*cept evo
    Reviews found online6780
  4. 74

    Comfort

    Dynapro HP2 RA33 +4
    70
    Why this score
    SourceDynapro HP2 RA33Winter i*cept evo
    Reviews found online7971
  5. 70

    Noise

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceDynapro HP2 RA33Winter i*cept evo
    Reviews found online74–
  6. 72

    Treadwear

    Dynapro HP2 RA33 +5
    67
    Why this score
    SourceDynapro HP2 RA33Winter i*cept evo
    Reviews found online7668
  7. 77

    Handling

    Dynapro HP2 RA33 +8
    69
    Why this score
    SourceDynapro HP2 RA33Winter i*cept evo
    Reviews found online7769
Scores at a glance
Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33 vs Hankook Winter i*cept evo: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryHankook Dynapro HP2 RA33Hankook Winter i*cept evo
Relative Score 74 70
Dry 75 68
Wet 78 73
Snow 68 76
Comfort 74 70
Noise 70 –
Treadwear 72 67
Handling 77 69

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Less important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Less important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost

Neither tire has a score here yet, so this weight changes nothing.

Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Dynapro HP2 RA33

Winter i*cept evo

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

The professional test results behind the scores

Each result is shown as % of the best tire in that test. “Same test” rows are the strictest comparison: both tires were measured side by side.

DisciplineCategoryDynapro HP2 RA33Winter i*cept evoΔBoth?
Overall Ranking Overall 20% #5/6 · 2016 Off Road Summer SUV Tyre Test 20% #5/7 · 2011 Auto Bild Performance Winter Tyre Test 0.0 Different tests

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Dynapro HP2 RA33

Pros

  • Exceptional value and cost-effectiveness compared to premium brands like Michelin
  • Quiet, smooth, and comfortable ride quality
  • Strong dry and wet traction under normal driving conditions

Cons

  • Occasional road noise or humming sound at higher speeds or on concrete surfaces
  • Potential for faster or average tread wear depending on driving habits and vehicle type
  • Some users reported sketchy wet cornering grip or sliding on roundabouts
All owner themes in the Dynapro HP2 RA33 review

Tire B Winter i*cept evo

Pros

  • Exceptional grip and capability in deep snow and ice
  • Favorable price-to-performance/value ratio compared to premium brands
  • Good aquaplaning resistance and handling in heavy rain

Cons

  • Inconsistent or poor wet weather traction reported by some drivers
  • Prone to wheelspin under acceleration in damp or cold conditions
  • Squirmy feel or reduced stability in warmer weather or at high highway speeds
All owner themes in the Winter i*cept evo review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33 B · Hankook Winter i*cept evo
CategorySummerWinter
Vehicle typeSUV and 4x4Passenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available175
Rim diameters15″ – 22″15″ – 18″
Treadwear warranty65,000 mi—

Which one should you actually buy?

Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33

Hankook Winter i*cept evo

Winner: Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33 — better handling, dry and wet. Pick the Hankook Winter i*cept evo if snow matters most to you.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33 scores 77 vs 69 on handling.

Pick tire B You drive through snowy winters

Hankook Winter i*cept evo scores 76 vs 68 on snow.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33 scores 75 vs 68 on dry.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33 scores 78 vs 73 on wet.

Tire A · Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33
Tire B · Hankook Winter i*cept evo

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.

74

Narrow edge

Dynapro HP2 RA33

Amazon