Tests – · none yet Owners 77 · 67 reviews
Kumho Ecsta 712 looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.
Head-to-head
Updated
Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33 vs Kumho Ecsta 712 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 67 + 10 owner reviews. How we score
Dynapro HP2 RA33 is ahead, 75–48
Add your size for an exact match
/R
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
75
Dry
Dynapro HP2 RA33 +2748Why this score
Source Dynapro HP2 RA33 Ecsta 712 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 72 (est.) ≈ 55 (est.) Reviews found online 79 37 Dynapro HP2 RA33: 60% × 72.2 (est.) + 40% × 78.8 = 75
Ecsta 712: 60% × 55.4 (est.) + 40% × 37.1 = 48
No road tests of dry for Dynapro HP2 RA33. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
No road tests of dry for Ecsta 712. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
-
77
Wet
Dynapro HP2 RA33 +3344Why this score
Source Dynapro HP2 RA33 Ecsta 712 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 76 (est.) ≈ 50 (est.) Reviews found online 80 35 Dynapro HP2 RA33: 60% × 75.5 (est.) + 40% × 80 = 77
Ecsta 712: 60% × 50.2 (est.) + 40% × 34.8 = 44
No road tests of wet for Dynapro HP2 RA33. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
No road tests of wet for Ecsta 712. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
-
68
Snow
No comparison–Why this score
Source Dynapro HP2 RA33 Ecsta 712 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 69 (est.) – Reviews found online 67 – Dynapro HP2 RA33: 60% × 69 (est.) + 40% × 67.2 = 68
No road tests of snow for Dynapro HP2 RA33. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).
-
74
Comfort
Dynapro HP2 RA33 +2351Why this score
Source Dynapro HP2 RA33 Ecsta 712 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 71 (est.) ≈ 63 (est.) Reviews found online 79 33 Dynapro HP2 RA33: 60% × 70.9 (est.) + 40% × 79.2 = 74
Ecsta 712: 60% × 62.9 (est.) + 40% × 33.2 = 51
No road tests of comfort for Dynapro HP2 RA33 or Ecsta 712. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
70
Noise
No comparison–Why this score
Source Dynapro HP2 RA33 Ecsta 712 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 67 (est.) – Reviews found online 74 – Dynapro HP2 RA33: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 74.4 = 70
No road tests of noise for Dynapro HP2 RA33. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
72
Treadwear
Dynapro HP2 RA33 +1359Why this score
Source Dynapro HP2 RA33 Ecsta 712 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 69 (est.) ≈ 62 (est.) Reviews found online 76 54 Dynapro HP2 RA33: 60% × 68.8 (est.) + 40% × 75.8 = 72
Ecsta 712: 60% × 62.1 (est.) + 40% × 54.1 = 59
No road tests of treadwear for Dynapro HP2 RA33. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
No road tests of treadwear for Ecsta 712. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
-
77
Handling (owners)
Dynapro HP2 RA33 +4334Why this score
Source Dynapro HP2 RA33 Ecsta 712 Reviews found online 77 34
Scores at a glance
| Category | Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33 | Kumho Ecsta 712 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 75 | 48 |
| Dry | 75 | 48 |
| Wet | 77 | 44 |
| Snow | 68 | – |
| Comfort | 74 | 51 |
| Noise | 70 | – |
| Treadwear | 72 | 59 |
| Handling (owners) | 77 | 34 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
75
/ 100
Dynapro HP2 RA33
48
/ 100
Ecsta 712
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Dynapro HP2 RA33
Pros
- Exceptional value and cost-effectiveness compared to premium brands like Michelin
- Quiet, smooth, and comfortable ride quality
- Strong dry and wet traction under normal driving conditions
Cons
- Occasional road noise or humming sound at higher speeds or on concrete surfaces
- Potential for faster or average tread wear depending on driving habits and vehicle type
- Some users reported sketchy wet cornering grip or sliding on roundabouts
Tire B Ecsta 712
Pros
- Highly competitive price point
- Better-than-average tread life compared to some premium performance tires
- Acceptable dry weather handling for casual driving
Cons
- Dangerous and unpredictable wet weather traction
- High levels of road noise and harsh ride quality
- Poor steering feedback and tendency for understeer/oversteer
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33 | B · Kumho Ecsta 712 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | All Season |
| Vehicle type | SUV and 4x4 | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 49 | — |
| Rim diameters | 15″ – 22″ | — |
| Treadwear warranty | 65,000 mi | — |
Which one should you actually buy?
75
/ 100
Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33
48
/ 100
Kumho Ecsta 712
Winner: Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33 — better handling, wet and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score. Kumho Ecsta 712 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 10 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Pick tire A
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33 scores 77 vs 34 on handling.
Pick tire A
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33 scores 77 vs 44 on wet.
Pick tire A
You want the most grip on dry roads
Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33 scores 75 vs 48 on dry.
Pick tire A
You want the most comfortable ride
Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33 scores 74 vs 51 on comfort.
Tire A · Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33
Tire B · Kumho Ecsta 712
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Dynapro HP2 RA33 or Ecsta 712?
Which is better in the wet, Dynapro HP2 RA33 or Ecsta 712?
Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33, 77 vs 44 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Dynapro HP2 RA33 or Ecsta 712?
Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33, 75 vs 48 on our dry score.
Which is more comfortable, Dynapro HP2 RA33 or Ecsta 712?
Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33, 74 vs 51 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Dynapro HP2 RA33 or Ecsta 712?
Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33, 72 vs 59 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology