Head-to-head Updated

Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33 vs Kumho Ecsta KH11 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 67 + 6 owner reviews. How we score

Dynapro HP2 RA33 is ahead, 74–55

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Kumho Ecsta KH11
Tire BKumho

Ecsta KH11

Summer

± 8Provisional

Tests – · none yet Owners 49 · 6 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 74

    Dry

    Dynapro HP2 RA33 +20
    54
    Why this score
    SourceDynapro HP2 RA33Ecsta KH11
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 72 (est.)≈ 59 (est.)
    Reviews found online7747

    Dynapro HP2 RA33: 60% × 72 (est.) + 40% × 77.4 = 74

    Ecsta KH11: 60% × 59 (est.) + 40% × 46.5 = 54

    No road tests of dry for Dynapro HP2 RA33. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).

    No road tests of dry for Ecsta KH11. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).

  2. 78

    Wet

    Dynapro HP2 RA33 +22
    56
    Why this score
    SourceDynapro HP2 RA33Ecsta KH11
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 76 (est.)≈ 59 (est.)
    Reviews found online8050

    Dynapro HP2 RA33: 60% × 75.9 (est.) + 40% × 80.1 = 78

    Ecsta KH11: 60% × 59.3 (est.) + 40% × 50.1 = 56

    No road tests of wet for Dynapro HP2 RA33. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

    No road tests of wet for Ecsta KH11. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 69

    Snow

    Dynapro HP2 RA33 +16
    53
    Why this score
    SourceDynapro HP2 RA33Ecsta KH11
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 69 (est.)≈ 60 (est.)
    Reviews found online6742

    Dynapro HP2 RA33: 60% × 69.5 (est.) + 40% × 67.3 = 69

    Ecsta KH11: 60% × 60.2 (est.) + 40% × 42.4 = 53

    No road tests of snow for Dynapro HP2 RA33. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).

    No road tests of snow for Ecsta KH11. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).

  4. 75

    Comfort

    Dynapro HP2 RA33 +20
    55
    Why this score
    SourceDynapro HP2 RA33Ecsta KH11
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 71 (est.)≈ 65 (est.)
    Reviews found online7849

    Dynapro HP2 RA33: 40% × 70.7 (est.) + 60% × 77.9 = 75

    Ecsta KH11: 40% × 65.4 (est.) + 60% × 48.6 = 55

    No road tests of comfort for Dynapro HP2 RA33 or Ecsta KH11. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 70

    Noise

    Dynapro HP2 RA33 +12
    58
    Why this score
    SourceDynapro HP2 RA33Ecsta KH11
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online7546

    Dynapro HP2 RA33: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 74.7 = 70

    Ecsta KH11: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 46.1 = 58

    No road tests of noise for Dynapro HP2 RA33 or Ecsta KH11. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 72

    Treadwear

    Dynapro HP2 RA33 +13
    59
    Why this score
    SourceDynapro HP2 RA33Ecsta KH11
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 70 (est.)≈ 62 (est.)
    Reviews found online7655

    Dynapro HP2 RA33: 60% × 69.7 (est.) + 40% × 76.4 = 72

    Ecsta KH11: 60% × 62.1 (est.) + 40% × 54.7 = 59

    No road tests of treadwear for Dynapro HP2 RA33. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).

    No road tests of treadwear for Ecsta KH11. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).

  7. 74

    Handling (owners)

    Dynapro HP2 RA33 +23
    51
    Why this score
    SourceDynapro HP2 RA33Ecsta KH11
    Reviews found online7451
Scores at a glance
Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33 vs Kumho Ecsta KH11: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryHankook Dynapro HP2 RA33Kumho Ecsta KH11
Relative Score 74 55
Dry 74 54
Wet 78 56
Snow 69 53
Comfort 75 55
Noise 70 58
Treadwear 72 59
Handling (owners) 74 51

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 7

Dynapro HP2 RA33

± 8

Ecsta KH11

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Dynapro HP2 RA33

Pros

  • Exceptional value and cost-effectiveness compared to premium brands like Michelin
  • Quiet, smooth, and comfortable ride quality
  • Strong dry and wet traction under normal driving conditions

Cons

  • Occasional road noise or humming sound at higher speeds or on concrete surfaces
  • Potential for faster or average tread wear depending on driving habits and vehicle type
  • Some users reported sketchy wet cornering grip or sliding on roundabouts
All owner themes in the Dynapro HP2 RA33 review

Tire B Ecsta KH11

Pros

  • Exceptional tread life and longevity with proper maintenance
  • Balanced performance in both wet and dry conditions for select users
  • Attractive cost compared to premium competitors like Pirelli and Michelin

Cons

  • Soft sidewalls leading to poor handling stability and a rolling sensation
  • Inconsistent or disappointing grip, particularly in wet weather
  • Rapid and unexpected tread wear reported by some users
All owner themes in the Ecsta KH11 review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33 B · Kumho Ecsta KH11
CategorySummerSummer
Vehicle typeSUV and 4x4Passenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available493
Rim diameters15″ – 22″15″ – 18″
Tread depth—8.9/32″
UTQG—340 A A
Treadwear warranty65,000 mi—
Sidewall—Blackwall
Max pressure—51 psi
Sizes in common11

Which one should you actually buy?

Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33

Kumho Ecsta KH11

Winner: Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33 — better handling, wet and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score. Kumho Ecsta KH11 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 6 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33 scores 74 vs 51 on handling.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33 scores 78 vs 56 on wet.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33 scores 74 vs 54 on dry.

Pick tire A You want the most comfortable ride

Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33 scores 75 vs 55 on comfort.

Tire A · Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33
Tire B · Kumho Ecsta KH11

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Dynapro HP2 RA33 or Ecsta KH11?

Which is better in the wet, Dynapro HP2 RA33 or Ecsta KH11?

Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33, 78 vs 56 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Dynapro HP2 RA33 or Ecsta KH11?

Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33, 74 vs 54 on our dry score.

Which is better in snow, Dynapro HP2 RA33 or Ecsta KH11?

Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33, 69 vs 53 on our snow score.

Which is quieter, Dynapro HP2 RA33 or Ecsta KH11?

Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33, 70 vs 58 on our noise score.

Which is more comfortable, Dynapro HP2 RA33 or Ecsta KH11?

Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33, 75 vs 55 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Dynapro HP2 RA33 or Ecsta KH11?

Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33, 72 vs 59 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology