Tests – · none yet Owners 76 · 67 reviews
Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33 vs Michelin CrossClimate+ — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 13 road tests and 67 + 121 owner reviews. How we score
CrossClimate+ is ahead, 79–74
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 81 · 13 tests Owners 78 · 121 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 15 in 2019 Summer and All Season Tyre Test (dry handling)
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
74
Dry
CrossClimate+ +1387Why this score
Source Dynapro HP2 RA33 CrossClimate+ Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 13 tests ≈ 72 (est.) 94 Reviews found online 77 78 Dynapro HP2 RA33: 60% × 71.7 (est.) + 40% × 76.9 = 74
CrossClimate+: 60% × 93.9 + 40% × 77.5 = 87
No road tests of dry for Dynapro HP2 RA33. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
-
77
Wet
CrossClimate+ +481Why this score
Source Dynapro HP2 RA33 CrossClimate+ Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 13 tests ≈ 76 (est.) 81 Reviews found online 80 81 Dynapro HP2 RA33: 60% × 75.8 (est.) + 40% × 79.9 = 77
CrossClimate+: 60% × 80.8 + 40% × 80.6 = 81
No road tests of wet for Dynapro HP2 RA33. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
68
Snow
Level68Why this score
Source Dynapro HP2 RA33 CrossClimate+ Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 9 tests ≈ 69 (est.) 65 Reviews found online 67 72 Dynapro HP2 RA33: 60% × 69.4 (est.) + 40% × 66.9 = 68
CrossClimate+: 60% × 65 + 40% × 72.3 = 68
No road tests of snow for Dynapro HP2 RA33. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
-
75
Comfort
Level75Why this score
Source Dynapro HP2 RA33 CrossClimate+ Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests ≈ 71 (est.) 71 Reviews found online 77 77 Dynapro HP2 RA33: 40% × 70.5 (est.) + 60% × 77.3 = 75
CrossClimate+: 40% × 70.9 + 60% × 77 = 75
No road tests of comfort for Dynapro HP2 RA33. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
-
70
Noise
Dynapro HP2 RA33 +367Why this score
Source Dynapro HP2 RA33 CrossClimate+ Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 9 tests ≈ 66 (est.) 68 Reviews found online 74 ≈ 66 (est.) Dynapro HP2 RA33: 60% × 66.3 (est.) + 40% × 74.3 = 70
CrossClimate+: 60% × 67.6 + 40% × 66.3 (est.) = 67
No road tests of noise for Dynapro HP2 RA33. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
No owner ratings of noise for CrossClimate+. The owner half is the owners’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.
-
73
Treadwear
CrossClimate+ +982Why this score
Source Dynapro HP2 RA33 CrossClimate+ Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 3 tests ≈ 70 (est.) 83 Reviews found online 77 80 Dynapro HP2 RA33: 60% × 70.2 (est.) + 40% × 76.7 = 73
CrossClimate+: 60% × 83.2 + 40% × 79.7 = 82
No road tests of treadwear for Dynapro HP2 RA33. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
-
74
Handling (owners)
Dynapro HP2 RA33 +272Why this score
Source Dynapro HP2 RA33 CrossClimate+ Reviews found online 74 72 -
–
Efficiency
No comparison74Why this score
Source Dynapro HP2 RA33 CrossClimate+ Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 8 tests – 74
Scores at a glance
| Category | Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33 | Michelin CrossClimate+ |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 74 | 79 |
| Dry | 74 | 87 |
| Wet | 77 | 81 |
| Snow | 68 | 68 |
| Comfort | 75 | 75 |
| Noise | 70 | 67 |
| Treadwear | 73 | 82 |
| Handling (owners) | 74 | 72 |
| Efficiency | – | 74 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Dynapro HP2 RA33
CrossClimate+
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
The professional test results behind the scores
Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.
| Discipline | Category | Dynapro HP2 RA33 | CrossClimate+ | Δ | Head-to-head |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Also published by the testers (not in the score) | |||||
| Overall Ranking | Overall | #11/15 2017 ADAC SUV Summer Tyre Test | #2/4 2022 AutoView All-Season Tire Test R18 | – | Different tests |
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Dynapro HP2 RA33
Pros
- Exceptional value and cost-effectiveness compared to premium brands like Michelin
- Quiet, smooth, and comfortable ride quality
- Strong dry and wet traction under normal driving conditions
Cons
- Occasional road noise or humming sound at higher speeds or on concrete surfaces
- Potential for faster or average tread wear depending on driving habits and vehicle type
- Some users reported sketchy wet cornering grip or sliding on roundabouts
Tire B CrossClimate+
Pros
- Strong snow and cold-weather traction for an all-season tyre, with many owners reporting winter-tyre-like confidence on snow, slush and hills, including on front-wheel-drive cars.
- Excellent dry handling and steering response with precise, summer-tyre-like feel, along with generally very good wet grip and braking.
- Long tread life: many reports of 30,000–55,000+ km or miles with low wear, including taxi and van use and 4-year/50,000-mile ownership.
Cons
- Performance degradation with age: several owners report grip (wet and snow), noise and ride deteriorating after about 1–2 years, with hardening or cracking of the rubber in some cases.
- Limitations on ice, packed snow and deep or steep snow, where some owners found them inferior to dedicated winter tyres or to rivals such as the Goodyear Vector 4Seasons.
- Wet-weather concerns for some, including aquaplaning, being pulled around by standing water, and scary steering feel as the tyres aged.
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33 | B · Michelin CrossClimate+ |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | All Season |
| Vehicle type | SUV and 4x4 | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 49 | 63 |
| Rim diameters | 15″ – 22″ | 13″ – 19″ |
| Treadwear warranty | 65,000 mi | — |
| Sizes in common | 7 | 7 |
Which one should you actually buy?
Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33
Michelin CrossClimate+
Winner: Michelin CrossClimate+ — better dry, treadwear and wet. Pick the Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33 if noise matters most to you.
Michelin CrossClimate+ scores 87 vs 74 on dry.
Michelin CrossClimate+ scores 82 vs 73 on treadwear.
Michelin CrossClimate+ scores 81 vs 77 on wet.
Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33 scores 70 vs 67 on noise.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Dynapro HP2 RA33 or CrossClimate+?
Which is better in the wet, Dynapro HP2 RA33 or CrossClimate+?
Michelin CrossClimate+, 81 vs 77 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Dynapro HP2 RA33 or CrossClimate+?
Michelin CrossClimate+, 87 vs 74 on our dry score.
Which is better in snow, Dynapro HP2 RA33 or CrossClimate+?
Neither, by our numbers: 68 vs 68 on the snow score, within 3 points.
Which is quieter, Dynapro HP2 RA33 or CrossClimate+?
Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33, 70 vs 67 on our noise score.
Which is more comfortable, Dynapro HP2 RA33 or CrossClimate+?
Neither, by our numbers: 75 vs 75 on the comfort score, within 3 points.
Which lasts longer, Dynapro HP2 RA33 or CrossClimate+?
Michelin CrossClimate+, 82 vs 73 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology