tirewheelguide

Nexen N FERA SUR4 looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.

Head-to-head Updated

Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33 vs Nexen N FERA SUR4 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 67 + 6 owner reviews. How we score

Dynapro HP2 RA33 is ahead, 75–62

Check price on Amazon · Dynapro HP2 RA33 or N FERA SUR4 on Amazon
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Nexen N FERA SUR4
Tire BNexen

N FERA SUR4

Summer

Provisional

Tests – · none yet Owners 57 · 6 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 75

    Dry

    Dynapro HP2 RA33 +4
    71
    Why this score
    SourceDynapro HP2 RA33N FERA SUR4
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 72 (est.)≈ 70 (est.)
    Reviews found online7973

    Dynapro HP2 RA33: 60% × 72.2 (est.) + 40% × 78.8 = 75

    N FERA SUR4: 60% × 69.9 (est.) + 40% × 73.2 = 71

    No road tests of dry for Dynapro HP2 RA33. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

    No road tests of dry for N FERA SUR4. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

  2. 77

    Wet

    Dynapro HP2 RA33 +22
    55
    Why this score
    SourceDynapro HP2 RA33N FERA SUR4
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 76 (est.)≈ 59 (est.)
    Reviews found online8050

    Dynapro HP2 RA33: 60% × 75.5 (est.) + 40% × 80 = 77

    N FERA SUR4: 60% × 58.8 (est.) + 40% × 50.1 = 55

    No road tests of wet for Dynapro HP2 RA33. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

    No road tests of wet for N FERA SUR4. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

  3. 68

    Snow

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceDynapro HP2 RA33N FERA SUR4
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 69 (est.)–
    Reviews found online67–

    Dynapro HP2 RA33: 60% × 69 (est.) + 40% × 67.2 = 68

    No road tests of snow for Dynapro HP2 RA33. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).

  4. 74

    Comfort

    Dynapro HP2 RA33 +14
    60
    Why this score
    SourceDynapro HP2 RA33N FERA SUR4
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 71 (est.)≈ 66 (est.)
    Reviews found online7951

    Dynapro HP2 RA33: 60% × 70.9 (est.) + 40% × 79.2 = 74

    N FERA SUR4: 60% × 65.9 (est.) + 40% × 50.6 = 60

    No road tests of comfort for Dynapro HP2 RA33 or N FERA SUR4. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 70

    Noise

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceDynapro HP2 RA33N FERA SUR4
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)–
    Reviews found online74–

    Dynapro HP2 RA33: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 74.4 = 70

    No road tests of noise for Dynapro HP2 RA33. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 72

    Treadwear

    Dynapro HP2 RA33 +17
    55
    Why this score
    SourceDynapro HP2 RA33N FERA SUR4
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 69 (est.)≈ 60 (est.)
    Reviews found online7647

    Dynapro HP2 RA33: 60% × 68.8 (est.) + 40% × 75.8 = 72

    N FERA SUR4: 60% × 59.8 (est.) + 40% × 46.7 = 55

    No road tests of treadwear for Dynapro HP2 RA33. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

    No road tests of treadwear for N FERA SUR4. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

  7. 77

    Handling (owners)

    Dynapro HP2 RA33 +6
    71
    Why this score
    SourceDynapro HP2 RA33N FERA SUR4
    Reviews found online7771
Scores at a glance
CategoryHankook Dynapro HP2 RA33Nexen N FERA SUR4
Relative Score 75 62
Dry 75 71
Wet 77 55
Snow 68 –
Comfort 74 60
Noise 70 –
Treadwear 72 55
Handling (owners) 77 71

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Dynapro HP2 RA33

N FERA SUR4

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Dynapro HP2 RA33

Pros

  • Exceptional value and cost-effectiveness compared to premium brands like Michelin
  • Quiet, smooth, and comfortable ride quality
  • Strong dry and wet traction under normal driving conditions

Cons

  • Occasional road noise or humming sound at higher speeds or on concrete surfaces
  • Potential for faster or average tread wear depending on driving habits and vehicle type
  • Some users reported sketchy wet cornering grip or sliding on roundabouts
All owner themes in the Dynapro HP2 RA33 review

Tire B N FERA SUR4

Pros

  • Exceptional dry grip and track-day performance
  • Precise steering feedback and predictable handling
  • Cost-effective alternative to more expensive track tires

Cons

  • High level of road noise
  • Poor wet-weather performance and dangerous hydroplaning tendencies in heavy rain
  • Fast tread wear
All owner themes in the N FERA SUR4 review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33 B · Nexen N FERA SUR4
CategorySummerSummer
Vehicle typeSUV and 4x4Passenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available49—
Rim diameters15″ – 22″—
Treadwear warranty65,000 mi—

Which one should you actually buy?

Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33

Nexen N FERA SUR4

Winner: Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33 — better wet, treadwear and comfort. It leads or ties in every category we score. Nexen N FERA SUR4 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 6 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33 scores 77 vs 55 on wet.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33 scores 72 vs 55 on treadwear.

Pick tire A You want the most comfortable ride

Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33 scores 74 vs 60 on comfort.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33 scores 77 vs 71 on handling.

Tire A · Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Nexen N FERA SUR4
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Dynapro HP2 RA33 or N FERA SUR4?

Which is better in the wet, Dynapro HP2 RA33 or N FERA SUR4?

Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33, 77 vs 55 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Dynapro HP2 RA33 or N FERA SUR4?

Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33, 75 vs 71 on our dry score.

Which is more comfortable, Dynapro HP2 RA33 or N FERA SUR4?

Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33, 74 vs 60 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Dynapro HP2 RA33 or N FERA SUR4?

Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33, 72 vs 55 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology