Tests – · none yet Owners 77 · 67 reviews
Yokohama Advan Neova AD08 looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.
Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33 vs Yokohama Advan Neova AD08 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 67 + 31 owner reviews. How we score
Dynapro HP2 RA33 leads, 74–70 Narrow edge
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 69 · 31 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
75
Dry
Level75Why this score
Source Dynapro HP2 RA33 Advan Neova AD08 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 72 (est.) ≈ 73 (est.) Reviews found online 79 80 Dynapro HP2 RA33: 60% × 72.2 (est.) + 40% × 78.8 = 75
Advan Neova AD08: 60% × 72.5 (est.) + 40% × 79.7 = 75
No road tests of dry for Dynapro HP2 RA33. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
No road tests of dry for Advan Neova AD08. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
-
77
Wet
Dynapro HP2 RA33 +869Why this score
Source Dynapro HP2 RA33 Advan Neova AD08 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 76 (est.) ≈ 69 (est.) Reviews found online 80 69 Dynapro HP2 RA33: 60% × 75.5 (est.) + 40% × 80 = 77
Advan Neova AD08: 60% × 69.1 (est.) + 40% × 68.5 = 69
No road tests of wet for Dynapro HP2 RA33. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
No road tests of wet for Advan Neova AD08. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
-
68
Snow
Dynapro HP2 RA33 +365Why this score
Source Dynapro HP2 RA33 Advan Neova AD08 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 69 (est.) ≈ 67 (est.) Reviews found online 67 61 Dynapro HP2 RA33: 60% × 69 (est.) + 40% × 67.2 = 68
Advan Neova AD08: 60% × 67 (est.) + 40% × 61.3 = 65
No road tests of snow for Dynapro HP2 RA33. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).
No road tests of snow for Advan Neova AD08. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).
-
74
Comfort
Dynapro HP2 RA33 +668Why this score
Source Dynapro HP2 RA33 Advan Neova AD08 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 71 (est.) ≈ 69 (est.) Reviews found online 79 67 Dynapro HP2 RA33: 60% × 70.9 (est.) + 40% × 79.2 = 74
Advan Neova AD08: 60% × 68.7 (est.) + 40% × 66.6 = 68
No road tests of comfort for Dynapro HP2 RA33 or Advan Neova AD08. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
70
Noise
Dynapro HP2 RA33 +367Why this score
Source Dynapro HP2 RA33 Advan Neova AD08 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 67 (est.) ≈ 67 (est.) Reviews found online 74 68 Dynapro HP2 RA33: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 74.4 = 70
Advan Neova AD08: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 67.8 = 67
No road tests of noise for Dynapro HP2 RA33 or Advan Neova AD08. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
72
Treadwear
Dynapro HP2 RA33 +963Why this score
Source Dynapro HP2 RA33 Advan Neova AD08 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 69 (est.) ≈ 64 (est.) Reviews found online 76 61 Dynapro HP2 RA33: 60% × 68.8 (est.) + 40% × 75.8 = 72
Advan Neova AD08: 60% × 64.3 (est.) + 40% × 61.2 = 63
No road tests of treadwear for Dynapro HP2 RA33. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
No road tests of treadwear for Advan Neova AD08. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
-
77
Handling (owners)
Advan Neova AD08 +279Why this score
Source Dynapro HP2 RA33 Advan Neova AD08 Reviews found online 77 79
Scores at a glance
| Category | Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33 | Yokohama Advan Neova AD08 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 74 | 70 |
| Dry | 75 | 75 |
| Wet | 77 | 69 |
| Snow | 68 | 65 |
| Comfort | 74 | 68 |
| Noise | 70 | 67 |
| Treadwear | 72 | 63 |
| Handling (owners) | 77 | 79 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Dynapro HP2 RA33
Advan Neova AD08
The professional test results behind the scores
Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.
| Discipline | Category | Dynapro HP2 RA33 | Advan Neova AD08 | Δ | Head-to-head |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Also published by the testers (not in the score) | |||||
| Overall Ranking | Overall | #11/15 2017 ADAC SUV Summer Tyre Test | #4/10 2014 EVO Max Performance Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Dynapro HP2 RA33
Pros
- Exceptional value and cost-effectiveness compared to premium brands like Michelin
- Quiet, smooth, and comfortable ride quality
- Strong dry and wet traction under normal driving conditions
Cons
- Occasional road noise or humming sound at higher speeds or on concrete surfaces
- Potential for faster or average tread wear depending on driving habits and vehicle type
- Some users reported sketchy wet cornering grip or sliding on roundabouts
Tire B Advan Neova AD08
Pros
- Phenomenal dry grip and cornering traction
- Exceptional steering feedback and crisp response
- Stiff, robust sidewall and carcass construction
Cons
- Prone to overheating and rubber degradation/chunking during heavy track use
- Reduced performance and aquaplaning tendencies in heavy standing water
- Limited size availability for larger rims
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33 | B · Yokohama Advan Neova AD08 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | SUV and 4x4 | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 49 | — |
| Rim diameters | 15″ – 22″ | — |
| Tread depth | — | 9/32″ |
| UTQG | — | 180 A A |
| Treadwear warranty | 65,000 mi | — |
| Sidewall | — | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | — | 51 psi |
Which one should you actually buy?
Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33
Yokohama Advan Neova AD08
Narrow edge: Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33 — better treadwear, wet and comfort. Where the Yokohama Advan Neova AD08 is ahead, it is by less than 3 points.
Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33 scores 72 vs 63 on treadwear.
Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33 scores 77 vs 69 on wet.
Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33 scores 74 vs 68 on comfort.
Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33 scores 68 vs 65 on snow.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Dynapro HP2 RA33 or Advan Neova AD08?
Which is better in the wet, Dynapro HP2 RA33 or Advan Neova AD08?
Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33, 77 vs 69 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Dynapro HP2 RA33 or Advan Neova AD08?
Neither, by our numbers: 75 vs 75 on the dry score, within 3 points.
Which is better in snow, Dynapro HP2 RA33 or Advan Neova AD08?
Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33, 68 vs 65 on our snow score.
Which is quieter, Dynapro HP2 RA33 or Advan Neova AD08?
Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33, 70 vs 67 on our noise score.
Which is more comfortable, Dynapro HP2 RA33 or Advan Neova AD08?
Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33, 74 vs 68 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Dynapro HP2 RA33 or Advan Neova AD08?
Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33, 72 vs 63 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology