tirewheelguide
Head-to-head Updated

Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33 vs Yokohama Bluearth E51 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 67 + 4 owner reviews. How we score

Check price on Amazon · Dynapro HP2 RA33 Check price on Amazon · Bluearth E51
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Yokohama Bluearth E51
Tire BYokohama

Bluearth E51

Summer Premium Touring tires

Tests – · none yet Owners – · 4 reviews (needs 5)

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 74

    Dry

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceDynapro HP2 RA33Bluearth E51
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 72 (est.)–
    Reviews found online77–

    Dynapro HP2 RA33: 60% × 72 (est.) + 40% × 77.4 = 74

    No road tests of dry for Dynapro HP2 RA33. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).

  2. 78

    Wet

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceDynapro HP2 RA33Bluearth E51
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 76 (est.)–
    Reviews found online80–

    Dynapro HP2 RA33: 60% × 75.9 (est.) + 40% × 80.1 = 78

    No road tests of wet for Dynapro HP2 RA33. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 69

    Snow

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceDynapro HP2 RA33Bluearth E51
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 69 (est.)–
    Reviews found online67–

    Dynapro HP2 RA33: 60% × 69.5 (est.) + 40% × 67.3 = 69

    No road tests of snow for Dynapro HP2 RA33. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).

  4. 75

    Comfort

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceDynapro HP2 RA33Bluearth E51
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 71 (est.)–
    Reviews found online78–

    Dynapro HP2 RA33: 40% × 70.7 (est.) + 60% × 77.9 = 75

    No road tests of comfort for Dynapro HP2 RA33. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 70

    Noise

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceDynapro HP2 RA33Bluearth E51
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)–
    Reviews found online75–

    Dynapro HP2 RA33: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 74.7 = 70

    No road tests of noise for Dynapro HP2 RA33. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 72

    Treadwear

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceDynapro HP2 RA33Bluearth E51
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 70 (est.)–
    Reviews found online77–

    Dynapro HP2 RA33: 60% × 69.7 (est.) + 40% × 76.5 = 72

    No road tests of treadwear for Dynapro HP2 RA33. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).

  7. 74

    Handling (owners)

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceDynapro HP2 RA33Bluearth E51
    Reviews found online74–
Scores at a glance
CategoryHankook Dynapro HP2 RA33Yokohama Bluearth E51
Relative Score 74 –
Dry 74 –
Wet 78 –
Snow 69 –
Comfort 75 –
Noise 70 –
Treadwear 72 –
Handling (owners) 74 –

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 7

Dynapro HP2 RA33

Bluearth E51

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Dynapro HP2 RA33

Pros

  • Exceptional value and cost-effectiveness compared to premium brands like Michelin
  • Quiet, smooth, and comfortable ride quality
  • Strong dry and wet traction under normal driving conditions

Cons

  • Occasional road noise or humming sound at higher speeds or on concrete surfaces
  • Potential for faster or average tread wear depending on driving habits and vehicle type
  • Some users reported sketchy wet cornering grip or sliding on roundabouts
All owner themes in the Dynapro HP2 RA33 review

Tire B Bluearth E51

Pros

  • Impressive tread longevity and durability
  • Stable handling in dry conditions
  • Adequate performance for standard commuting

Cons

  • Excessive road noise and cabin resonance
  • Harsh ride quality due to stiff sidewalls
  • Poor wet-weather grip and susceptibility to hydroplaning
All owner themes in the Bluearth E51 review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33 B · Yokohama Bluearth E51
CategorySummerSummer Premium Touring tires
Vehicle typeSUV and 4x4Passenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available492
Rim diameters15″ – 22″17″ – 18″
Treadwear warranty65,000 mi—

Which one should you actually buy?

Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33

Yokohama Bluearth E51

Only Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33 has enough test and review data for a Relative Score, so there is no head-to-head winner yet.

Tire A · Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Yokohama Bluearth E51
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology