Head-to-head Updated

Hankook Dynapro HP2 vs Hankook Optimo H426 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 10 + 24 owner reviews. How we score

Dynapro HP2 is ahead, 56–49

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Hankook Dynapro HP2
Tire AHankook

Dynapro HP2

All-Season

± 8Provisional

Tests – · none yet Owners 48 · 10 reviews

Hankook Optimo H426
Tire BHankook

Optimo H426

All Season

± 8

Tests – · none yet Owners 40 · 24 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 58

    Dry

    Dynapro HP2 +7
    51
    Why this score
    SourceDynapro HP2Optimo H426
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 61 (est.)≈ 57 (est.)
    Reviews found online5242

    Dynapro HP2: 60% × 61.3 (est.) + 40% × 51.9 = 58

    Optimo H426: 60% × 57.1 (est.) + 40% × 41.6 = 51

    No road tests of dry for Dynapro HP2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

    No road tests of dry for Optimo H426. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

  2. 56

    Wet

    Dynapro HP2 +2
    54
    Why this score
    SourceDynapro HP2Optimo H426
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 59 (est.)≈ 58 (est.)
    Reviews found online5048

    Dynapro HP2: 60% × 59.4 (est.) + 40% × 50 = 56

    Optimo H426: 60% × 58.3 (est.) + 40% × 47.9 = 54

    No road tests of wet for Dynapro HP2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

    No road tests of wet for Optimo H426. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 59

    Snow

    Dynapro HP2 +10
    49
    Why this score
    SourceDynapro HP2Optimo H426
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 64 (est.)≈ 59 (est.)
    Reviews found online5135

    Dynapro HP2: 60% × 64.3 (est.) + 40% × 50.8 = 59

    Optimo H426: 60% × 59.2 (est.) + 40% × 34.8 = 49

    No road tests of snow for Dynapro HP2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

    No road tests of snow for Optimo H426. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

  4. 53

    Comfort

    Dynapro HP2 +11
    42
    Why this score
    SourceDynapro HP2Optimo H426
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 64 (est.)≈ 61 (est.)
    Reviews found online4630

    Dynapro HP2: 40% × 64.1 (est.) + 60% × 45.9 = 53

    Optimo H426: 40% × 60.9 (est.) + 60% × 30.1 = 42

    No road tests of comfort for Dynapro HP2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

    No road tests of comfort for Optimo H426. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

  5. –

    Noise

    No comparison
    60
    Why this score
    SourceDynapro HP2Optimo H426
    Professional tests (TWG score)–≈ 66 (est.)
    Reviews found online–51

    Optimo H426: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 50.6 = 60

    No road tests of noise for Optimo H426. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 52

    Treadwear

    Dynapro HP2 +5
    47
    Why this score
    SourceDynapro HP2Optimo H426
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 58 (est.)≈ 55 (est.)
    Reviews found online4235

    Dynapro HP2: 60% × 57.8 (est.) + 40% × 42.4 = 52

    Optimo H426: 60% × 55.2 (est.) + 40% × 35.2 = 47

    No road tests of treadwear for Dynapro HP2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

    No road tests of treadwear for Optimo H426. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

  7. 48

    Handling (owners)

    Dynapro HP2 +13
    35
    Why this score
    SourceDynapro HP2Optimo H426
    Reviews found online4835
Scores at a glance
Hankook Dynapro HP2 vs Hankook Optimo H426: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryHankook Dynapro HP2Hankook Optimo H426
Relative Score 56 49
Dry 58 51
Wet 56 54
Snow 59 49
Comfort 53 42
Noise – 60
Treadwear 52 47
Handling (owners) 48 35

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 8

Dynapro HP2

± 8

Optimo H426

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Dynapro HP2

Pros

  • Reliable handling and roadability on dry pavement
  • Good fuel economy and low rolling resistance contributing to high MPG
  • Capably handles towing duties on all-wheel-drive vehicles

Cons

  • Faster-than-expected tread wear reported by multiple users
  • Poor wet weather performance and dangerous sliding tendencies in rain
  • Inconsistent snow traction, with some users noting a lack of confidence in winter conditions
All owner themes in the Dynapro HP2 review

Tire B Optimo H426

Pros

  • Reliable dry and wet traction in moderate weather
  • Comfortable and smooth initial ride quality
  • Confident handling and cornering capabilities

Cons

  • Accelerated tread wear in the latter half of the tire's life span
  • Subpar performance and loss of grip in cold temperatures or snow
  • Increased road noise as the tires age
All owner themes in the Optimo H426 review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Hankook Dynapro HP2 B · Hankook Optimo H426
CategoryAll-SeasonAll Season
Vehicle typeSUV and 4x4Passenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available4411
Rim diameters15″ – 20″15″ – 20″
Tread depth—10/32″
UTQG360 - 820 A A440 A A
Treadwear warranty—60,000 mi
Sidewall—Blackwall
Max pressure—44 psi
Sizes in common11

Which one should you actually buy?

Hankook Dynapro HP2

Hankook Optimo H426

Winner: Hankook Dynapro HP2 — better handling, comfort and snow. It leads or ties in every category we score. Hankook Dynapro HP2 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 10 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Hankook Dynapro HP2 scores 48 vs 35 on handling.

Pick tire A You want the most comfortable ride

Hankook Dynapro HP2 scores 53 vs 42 on comfort.

Pick tire A You drive through snowy winters

Hankook Dynapro HP2 scores 59 vs 49 on snow.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

Hankook Dynapro HP2 scores 58 vs 51 on dry.

Tire A · Hankook Dynapro HP2
Tire B · Hankook Optimo H426

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Dynapro HP2 or Optimo H426?

Which is better in the wet, Dynapro HP2 or Optimo H426?

Neither, by our numbers: 56 vs 54 on the wet score, within 3 points.

Which grips better on dry roads, Dynapro HP2 or Optimo H426?

Hankook Dynapro HP2, 58 vs 51 on our dry score.

Which is better in snow, Dynapro HP2 or Optimo H426?

Hankook Dynapro HP2, 59 vs 49 on our snow score.

Which is more comfortable, Dynapro HP2 or Optimo H426?

Hankook Dynapro HP2, 53 vs 42 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Dynapro HP2 or Optimo H426?

Hankook Dynapro HP2, 52 vs 47 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology