Tests – · none yet Owners 40 · 24 reviews
Hankook Optimo H426 vs Bridgestone Ecopia EP422 Plus — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 24 + 24 owner reviews. How we score
Optimo H426 leads, 50–48 Narrow edge
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 38 · 24 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
51
Dry
Optimo H426 +843Why this score
Source Optimo H426 Ecopia EP422 Plus Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 57 (est.) ≈ 52 (est.) Reviews found online 42 30 Optimo H426: 60% × 57.1 (est.) + 40% × 41.6 = 51
Ecopia EP422 Plus: 60% × 52.3 (est.) + 40% × 30 = 43
No road tests of dry for Optimo H426. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
No road tests of dry for Ecopia EP422 Plus. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
-
54
Wet
Optimo H426 +351Why this score
Source Optimo H426 Ecopia EP422 Plus Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 58 (est.) ≈ 56 (est.) Reviews found online 48 44 Optimo H426: 60% × 58.3 (est.) + 40% × 47.9 = 54
Ecopia EP422 Plus: 60% × 55.9 (est.) + 40% × 43.6 = 51
No road tests of wet for Optimo H426. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
No road tests of wet for Ecopia EP422 Plus. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
49
Snow
Ecopia EP422 Plus +453Why this score
Source Optimo H426 Ecopia EP422 Plus Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 59 (est.) ≈ 61 (est.) Reviews found online 35 41 Optimo H426: 60% × 59.2 (est.) + 40% × 34.8 = 49
Ecopia EP422 Plus: 60% × 61.1 (est.) + 40% × 40.8 = 53
No road tests of snow for Optimo H426. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
No road tests of snow for Ecopia EP422 Plus. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
-
42
Comfort
Ecopia EP422 Plus +345Why this score
Source Optimo H426 Ecopia EP422 Plus Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 61 (est.) ≈ 62 (est.) Reviews found online 30 34 Optimo H426: 40% × 60.9 (est.) + 60% × 30.1 = 42
Ecopia EP422 Plus: 40% × 61.8 (est.) + 60% × 34.4 = 45
No road tests of comfort for Optimo H426. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
No road tests of comfort for Ecopia EP422 Plus. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
-
60
Noise
Optimo H426 +456Why this score
Source Optimo H426 Ecopia EP422 Plus Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 66 (est.) ≈ 66 (est.) Reviews found online 51 41 Optimo H426: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 50.6 = 60
Ecopia EP422 Plus: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 40.5 = 56
No road tests of noise for Optimo H426 or Ecopia EP422 Plus. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
47
Treadwear
Ecopia EP422 Plus +350Why this score
Source Optimo H426 Ecopia EP422 Plus Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 55 (est.) ≈ 57 (est.) Reviews found online 35 40 Optimo H426: 60% × 55.2 (est.) + 40% × 35.2 = 47
Ecopia EP422 Plus: 60% × 56.9 (est.) + 40% × 39.8 = 50
No road tests of treadwear for Optimo H426. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
No road tests of treadwear for Ecopia EP422 Plus. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
-
35
Handling (owners)
Optimo H426 +134Why this score
Source Optimo H426 Ecopia EP422 Plus Reviews found online 35 34
Scores at a glance
| Category | Hankook Optimo H426 | Bridgestone Ecopia EP422 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 50 | 48 |
| Dry | 51 | 43 |
| Wet | 54 | 51 |
| Snow | 49 | 53 |
| Comfort | 42 | 45 |
| Noise | 60 | 56 |
| Treadwear | 47 | 50 |
| Handling (owners) | 35 | 34 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Optimo H426
Ecopia EP422 Plus
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Optimo H426
Pros
- Reliable dry and wet traction in moderate weather
- Comfortable and smooth initial ride quality
- Confident handling and cornering capabilities
Cons
- Accelerated tread wear in the latter half of the tire's life span
- Subpar performance and loss of grip in cold temperatures or snow
- Increased road noise as the tires age
Tire B Ecopia EP422 Plus
Pros
- Excellent fuel economy and low rolling resistance
- Quiet and comfortable ride quality when new
- Predictable dry and wet traction for conservative daily commuting
Cons
- Significantly shorter tread life than advertised or expected
- Develops loud whining, buzzing, and increased noise as the tread wears down
- Stiff ride quality or harshness over rough pavement and cracks
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Hankook Optimo H426 | B · Bridgestone Ecopia EP422 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All Season | All-Season |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 11 | 15 |
| Rim diameters | 15″ – 20″ | 15″ – 17″ |
| Tread depth | 10/32″ | 11/32″ |
| UTQG | 440 A A | 640 A A |
| Treadwear warranty | 60,000 mi | 70,000 mi |
| Sidewall | Blackwall | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | 44 psi | 44 psi |
| Sizes in common | 4 | 4 |
Which one should you actually buy?
Hankook Optimo H426
Bridgestone Ecopia EP422 Plus
Narrow edge: Hankook Optimo H426 — better dry, noise and wet. Pick the Bridgestone Ecopia EP422 Plus if snow, comfort and treadwear matter most to you.
Hankook Optimo H426 scores 51 vs 43 on dry.
Hankook Optimo H426 scores 60 vs 56 on noise.
Bridgestone Ecopia EP422 Plus scores 53 vs 49 on snow.
Hankook Optimo H426 scores 54 vs 51 on wet.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Optimo H426 or Ecopia EP422 Plus?
Which is better in the wet, Optimo H426 or Ecopia EP422 Plus?
Hankook Optimo H426, 54 vs 51 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Optimo H426 or Ecopia EP422 Plus?
Hankook Optimo H426, 51 vs 43 on our dry score.
Which is better in snow, Optimo H426 or Ecopia EP422 Plus?
Bridgestone Ecopia EP422 Plus, 53 vs 49 on our snow score.
Which is quieter, Optimo H426 or Ecopia EP422 Plus?
Hankook Optimo H426, 60 vs 56 on our noise score.
Which is more comfortable, Optimo H426 or Ecopia EP422 Plus?
Bridgestone Ecopia EP422 Plus, 45 vs 42 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Optimo H426 or Ecopia EP422 Plus?
Bridgestone Ecopia EP422 Plus, 50 vs 47 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology