Tests – · none yet Owners 48 · 10 reviews
Head-to-head
Updated
Hankook Dynapro HP2 vs Kumho Crugen HP71 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 10 + 277 owner reviews. How we score
Dynapro HP2 is ahead, 56–47
Add your size for an exact match
/R
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 34 · 277 reviews
“Tesla model y tire HP71 crugen on tirerack is offering $80 rebate per tire.”
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
58
Dry
Dynapro HP2 +1444Why this score
Source Dynapro HP2 Crugen HP71 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 61 (est.) ≈ 53 (est.) Reviews found online 52 31 Dynapro HP2: 60% × 61.3 (est.) + 40% × 51.9 = 58
Crugen HP71: 60% × 52.5 (est.) + 40% × 30.5 = 44
No road tests of dry for Dynapro HP2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
No road tests of dry for Crugen HP71. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
-
56
Wet
Dynapro HP2 +551Why this score
Source Dynapro HP2 Crugen HP71 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 59 (est.) ≈ 56 (est.) Reviews found online 50 44 Dynapro HP2: 60% × 59.4 (est.) + 40% × 50 = 56
Crugen HP71: 60% × 56.1 (est.) + 40% × 44 = 51
No road tests of wet for Dynapro HP2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
No road tests of wet for Crugen HP71. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
59
Snow
Dynapro HP2 +653Why this score
Source Dynapro HP2 Crugen HP71 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 64 (est.) ≈ 61 (est.) Reviews found online 51 41 Dynapro HP2: 60% × 64.3 (est.) + 40% × 50.8 = 59
Crugen HP71: 60% × 61.1 (est.) + 40% × 40.9 = 53
No road tests of snow for Dynapro HP2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
No road tests of snow for Crugen HP71. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
-
53
Comfort
Dynapro HP2 +944Why this score
Source Dynapro HP2 Crugen HP71 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 64 (est.) ≈ 61 (est.) Reviews found online 46 32 Dynapro HP2: 40% × 64.1 (est.) + 60% × 45.9 = 53
Crugen HP71: 40% × 61.3 (est.) + 60% × 32.2 = 44
No road tests of comfort for Dynapro HP2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
No road tests of comfort for Crugen HP71. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
-
–
Noise
No comparison54Why this score
Source Dynapro HP2 Crugen HP71 Professional tests (TWG score) – ≈ 66 (est.) Reviews found online – 36 Crugen HP71: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 35.8 = 54
No road tests of noise for Crugen HP71. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
52
Treadwear
Dynapro HP2 +1537Why this score
Source Dynapro HP2 Crugen HP71 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 58 (est.) ≈ 49 (est.) Reviews found online 42 19 Dynapro HP2: 60% × 57.8 (est.) + 40% × 42.4 = 52
Crugen HP71: 60% × 49.2 (est.) + 40% × 18.5 = 37
No road tests of treadwear for Dynapro HP2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
No road tests of treadwear for Crugen HP71. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
-
48
Handling (owners)
Crugen HP71 +351Why this score
Source Dynapro HP2 Crugen HP71 Reviews found online 48 51
Scores at a glance
| Category | Hankook Dynapro HP2 | Kumho Crugen HP71 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 56 | 47 |
| Dry | 58 | 44 |
| Wet | 56 | 51 |
| Snow | 59 | 53 |
| Comfort | 53 | 44 |
| Noise | – | 54 |
| Treadwear | 52 | 37 |
| Handling (owners) | 48 | 51 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
56
/ 100
Dynapro HP2
47
/ 100
Crugen HP71
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Dynapro HP2
Pros
- Reliable handling and roadability on dry pavement
- Good fuel economy and low rolling resistance contributing to high MPG
- Capably handles towing duties on all-wheel-drive vehicles
Cons
- Faster-than-expected tread wear reported by multiple users
- Poor wet weather performance and dangerous sliding tendencies in rain
- Inconsistent snow traction, with some users noting a lack of confidence in winter conditions
Tire B Crugen HP71
Pros
- Affordable pricing compared to premium tier brands
- Quiet and smooth ride quality when new
- Confident wet-weather traction and performance in heavy rain
Cons
- Significantly premature tread wear and short lifespan for many users
- Developing loud road noise or howling as mileage increases
- Balancing issues and vehicle vibrations
What real owners are saying
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Tire A
Hankook Dynapro HP2
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
Tire B
Mixed
Kumho Crugen HP71
Community opinions on the Kumho Crugen HP71 (including EV variants) are generally mixed, primarily leaning on price and initial comfort versus longevity. Many users appreciate the affordable pricing, quiet/smooth ride, and good handling, but a significant number report faster-than-expected tread wear and occasional issues with foam lining separation or durability on heavier vehicles.
r/Ioniq5
·1 upvote ·2026-08-30
“The HP71 are actually the OE tire for several trim/MY combinations for the Ioniq 5 and EV6 and they're decent tires. The longest lasting tire is the Defender 2, with the trade off of mediocre traction. I run the Nokian One because it's a batter balance of traction and tread wear than the defender but still quiet and very long-lasting.”
r/volvoc40
·61 upvotes ·2026-07-08
“Yet Another C40 Wheel Downsize Report I decided to join the crowd in downsizing from the factory 20" wheels to 18" Wheels: Voxx Paso Tires: Kumho Crugen EV HP71 (currently on sale for $500 for a set of 4) I was a bit worried about wheel fitment because of the large brake calipers, but they fit without issue, standard install. I've only put about 100 miles on them so far, but the ride is much more comfortable and these new tires are SO much quieter than the old tires that were installed when I bought the vehicle (CPO): Michelin Pilot Sport A/S 4 I don't have enough data yet to see if this will make a range improvement, but I imagine it will as they're skinnier tires and EV optimized. So far I'm impressed with the Kumho's, especially for the price they're offering. And I think these new wheels look pretty decent! Read more”
r/Cadillac
·2 upvotes ·2026-09-28
“I have The Kumho Crugen HP71 275/50 R22 111H on my 22 ESV Sport And don’t regret it at all. They are much better than original ones and also a lot cheaper in Walmart.”
Top themes
#Affordability and Value#Ride Comfort and Noise#Tread Wear and Longevity#EV Performance and Efficiency#Durability and Quality Issues
Based on 52 community posts
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Hankook Dynapro HP2 | B · Kumho Crugen HP71 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All-Season | Summer Ultra High Performance tires |
| Vehicle type | SUV and 4x4 | SUV and 4x4 |
| Sizes available | 44 | 63 |
| Rim diameters | 15″ – 20″ | 16″ – 22″ |
| Tread depth | — | 9.9/32″ |
| UTQG | 360 - 820 A A | 640 A A |
| Treadwear warranty | — | 65,000 mi |
| Sidewall | — | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | — | 51 psi |
| Sizes in common | 30 | 30 |
Which one should you actually buy?
56
/ 100
Hankook Dynapro HP2
47
/ 100
Kumho Crugen HP71
Winner: Hankook Dynapro HP2 — better treadwear, dry and comfort. Where the Kumho Crugen HP71 is ahead, it is by less than 3 points. Hankook Dynapro HP2 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 10 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Pick tire A
You want the longest tread life
Hankook Dynapro HP2 scores 52 vs 37 on treadwear.
Pick tire A
You want the most grip on dry roads
Hankook Dynapro HP2 scores 58 vs 44 on dry.
Pick tire A
You want the most comfortable ride
Hankook Dynapro HP2 scores 53 vs 44 on comfort.
Pick tire A
You drive through snowy winters
Hankook Dynapro HP2 scores 59 vs 53 on snow.
Tire A · Hankook Dynapro HP2
Tire B · Kumho Crugen HP71
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Dynapro HP2 or Crugen HP71?
Which is better in the wet, Dynapro HP2 or Crugen HP71?
Hankook Dynapro HP2, 56 vs 51 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Dynapro HP2 or Crugen HP71?
Hankook Dynapro HP2, 58 vs 44 on our dry score.
Which is better in snow, Dynapro HP2 or Crugen HP71?
Hankook Dynapro HP2, 59 vs 53 on our snow score.
Which is more comfortable, Dynapro HP2 or Crugen HP71?
Hankook Dynapro HP2, 53 vs 44 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Dynapro HP2 or Crugen HP71?
Hankook Dynapro HP2, 52 vs 37 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology