Tests – · none yet Owners 65 · 5 reviews
Best test result: #5 of 10 in 2016 All Terrain and Off Road MT Tyre Test (overall ranking)
Head-to-head
Updated
Hankook Dynapro M/T vs Hankook Winter i cept evo2 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): 60% professional tests, 40% owner reviews.
Winter i cept evo2 leads, 69–66 Narrow edge
Add your size for an exact match
/R
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 67 · 5 tests Owners 70 · 28 reviews
Best test result: #5 of 8 in 2015 Auto Bild Performance Winter Tyre Test (overall ranking)
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
65
Dry
Winter i cept evo2 +166Why this score
Source Dynapro M/T Winter i cept evo2 Professional tests (TWG score) – 64 Reviews found online 64 71 -
68
Wet
Winter i cept evo2 +371Why this score
Source Dynapro M/T Winter i cept evo2 Professional tests (TWG score) – 70 Reviews found online 67 72 -
69
Snow
Level69Why this score
Source Dynapro M/T Winter i cept evo2 Professional tests (TWG score) – 72 Reviews found online 69 65 -
62
Comfort
Winter i cept evo2 +870Why this score
Source Dynapro M/T Winter i cept evo2 Reviews found online 54 72 -
–
Noise
No comparison55Why this score
Source Dynapro M/T Winter i cept evo2 Professional tests (TWG score) – 47 -
66
Treadwear
Winter i cept evo2 +268Why this score
Source Dynapro M/T Winter i cept evo2 Professional tests (TWG score) – 67 Reviews found online 67 70 -
61
Handling
Winter i cept evo2 +1172Why this score
Source Dynapro M/T Winter i cept evo2 Reviews found online 61 72
Scores at a glance
| Category | Hankook Dynapro M/T | Hankook Winter i cept evo2 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 66 | 69 |
| Dry | 65 | 66 |
| Wet | 68 | 71 |
| Snow | 69 | 69 |
| Comfort | 62 | 70 |
| Noise | – | 55 |
| Treadwear | 66 | 68 |
| Handling | 61 | 72 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Less important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Less important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neither tire has a score here yet, so this weight changes nothing.
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
66
/ 100
Dynapro M/T
69
/ 100
Winter i cept evo2
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
The professional test results behind the scores
Each result is shown as % of the best tire in that test. “Same test” rows are the strictest comparison: both tires were measured side by side.
| Discipline | Category | Dynapro M/T | Winter i cept evo2 | Δ | Both? |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Ranking | Overall | 20% #5/10 · 2016 All Terrain and Off Road MT Tyre Test | 20% #5/8 · 2015 Auto Bild Performance Winter Tyre Test | 0.0 | Different tests |
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Dynapro M/T
Pros
- Exceptional tread life and overall mileage considering heavy use
- Surprisingly low road noise for a mud-terrain tire
- Strong dry and off-road traction, often reducing the need for 4WD
Cons
- Severe loss of wet traction and dangerous slip/understeer tendencies as the rubber compound hardens over time
- Prone to slow punctures on the running surface under heavy loads
- Develops uneven wear patterns over extended high-mileage use
Tire B Winter i cept evo2
Pros
- Impressive grip and traction on snow and ice
- High level of ride comfort and low noise levels
- Good value for money compared to higher-priced premium alternatives
Cons
- Soft sidewalls or goofy feel on dry roads, particularly in warmer winter temperatures
- Performance and grip degrade significantly as the tire ages over multiple seasons
- Can struggle to put down high torque/power on rear-wheel-drive vehicles
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Hankook Dynapro M/T | B · Hankook Winter i cept evo2 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All Season | Winter |
| Vehicle type | SUV and 4x4 | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | — | 79 |
| Rim diameters | — | 15″ – 22″ |
Which one should you actually buy?
66
/ 100
Hankook Dynapro M/T
69
/ 100
Hankook Winter i cept evo2
Winner: Hankook Winter i cept evo2 — better handling, comfort and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Pick tire B
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Hankook Winter i cept evo2 scores 72 vs 61 on handling.
Pick tire B
You want the most comfortable ride
Hankook Winter i cept evo2 scores 70 vs 62 on comfort.
Pick tire B
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Hankook Winter i cept evo2 scores 71 vs 68 on wet.
Tire A · Hankook Dynapro M/T
Tire B · Hankook Winter i cept evo2
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.