Tests 79 · 1 test Owners 74 · 3 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 9 in 2024 EV Tyre Test (dry braking)
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 1 + 1 road tests and 3 + 4 owner reviews. How we score
iON evo SUV is ahead, 76–68
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 79 · 1 test Owners 74 · 3 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 9 in 2024 EV Tyre Test (dry braking)
Tests 72 · 1 test Owners 61 · 4 reviews
Best test result: #2 of 7 in 2025 Quattroruote All-Season Tire Test R19 (dry lateral acceleration)
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
| Source | iON evo SUV | Kinergy 4S2 X (H750A) |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 1 tests | 82 | 72 |
| Reviews found online | 76 | 63 |
iON evo SUV: 60% × 81.9 + 40% × 75.7 = 79
Kinergy 4S2 X (H750A): 60% × 71.8 + 40% × 62.8 = 68
| Source | iON evo SUV | Kinergy 4S2 X (H750A) |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 1 tests | 77 | 78 |
| Reviews found online | 77 | 67 |
iON evo SUV: 60% × 77.5 + 40% × 77 = 77
Kinergy 4S2 X (H750A): 60% × 77.9 + 40% × 66.5 = 73
| Source | iON evo SUV | Kinergy 4S2 X (H750A) |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests | – | 70 |
| Reviews found online | – | 53 |
Kinergy 4S2 X (H750A): 60% × 69.8 + 40% × 52.9 = 63
| Source | iON evo SUV | Kinergy 4S2 X (H750A) |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests | ≈ 69 (est.) | 52 |
| Reviews found online | 72 | 60 |
iON evo SUV: 40% × 69.3 (est.) + 60% × 71.8 = 71
Kinergy 4S2 X (H750A): 40% × 51.6 + 60% × 59.8 = 57
No road tests of comfort for iON evo SUV. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
| Source | iON evo SUV | Kinergy 4S2 X (H750A) |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 1 tests | 83 | 72 |
| Reviews found online | ≈ 66 (est.) | 61 |
iON evo SUV: 60% × 82.5 + 40% × 66.4 (est.) = 76
Kinergy 4S2 X (H750A): 60% × 72.3 + 40% × 61.2 = 68
No owner ratings of noise for iON evo SUV. The owner half is the owners’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.
| Source | iON evo SUV | Kinergy 4S2 X (H750A) |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests | 78 | ≈ 64 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 69 | 60 |
iON evo SUV: 60% × 77.5 + 40% × 69.3 = 74
Kinergy 4S2 X (H750A): 60% × 64.2 (est.) + 40% × 60 = 62
No road tests of treadwear for Kinergy 4S2 X (H750A). The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
| Source | iON evo SUV | Kinergy 4S2 X (H750A) |
|---|---|---|
| Reviews found online | 75 | – |
| Source | iON evo SUV | Kinergy 4S2 X (H750A) |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests | 74 | – |
| Category | Hankook iON evo SUV | Hankook Kinergy 4S2 X (H750A) |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 76 | 68 |
| Dry | 79 | 68 |
| Wet | 77 | 73 |
| Snow | – | 63 |
| Comfort | 71 | 57 |
| Noise | 76 | 68 |
| Treadwear | 74 | 62 |
| Handling (owners) | 75 | – |
| Efficiency | 74 | – |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
iON evo SUV
Kinergy 4S2 X (H750A)
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.
| Discipline | Category | iON evo SUV | Kinergy 4S2 X (H750A) | Δ | Head-to-head |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dry Braking | Dry | 100% #1/9 · 2024 EV Tyre Test | 92% #4/7 · 2025 Quattroruote All-Season Tire Test R19 | – | Different tests |
| Straight Aquaplaning | Wet | 99% #5/9 · 2024 EV Tyre Test | 96% #3/7 · 2025 Quattroruote All-Season Tire Test R19 | – | Different tests |
| Wet Braking | Wet | 96% #5/9 · 2024 EV Tyre Test | 98% #5/7 · 2025 Quattroruote All-Season Tire Test R19 | – | Different tests |
| Also published by the testers (not in the score) | |||||
| Overall Ranking | Overall | #3/9 2024 EV Tyre Test | #4/7 2025 Quattroruote All-Season Tire Test R19 | – | Different tests |
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.
| Attribute | A · Hankook iON evo SUV | B · Hankook Kinergy 4S2 X (H750A) |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | All-Season tire |
| Vehicle type | SUV and 4x4 | SUV and 4x4 |
| Sizes available | 56 | 50 |
| Rim diameters | 17″ – 23″ | 16″ – 22″ |
| Tread depth | — | 10/32″ |
| UTQG | 200 - 340 A - AA A | 500 A A |
| Treadwear warranty | — | 60,000 mi |
| Sidewall | — | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | — | 51 psi |
| Sizes in common | 25 | 25 |
Hankook iON evo SUV
Hankook Kinergy 4S2 X (H750A)
Winner: Hankook iON evo SUV — better comfort, treadwear and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score. Hankook iON evo SUV rests on little evidence so far (1 test, 3 reviews), so read this result as provisional. Hankook Kinergy 4S2 X (H750A) rests on little evidence so far (1 test, 4 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Hankook iON evo SUV scores 71 vs 57 on comfort.
Hankook iON evo SUV scores 74 vs 62 on treadwear.
Hankook iON evo SUV scores 79 vs 68 on dry.
Hankook iON evo SUV scores 76 vs 68 on noise.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Hankook iON evo SUV, 77 vs 73 on our wet score.
Hankook iON evo SUV, 79 vs 68 on our dry score.
Hankook iON evo SUV, 76 vs 68 on our noise score.
Hankook iON evo SUV, 71 vs 57 on our comfort score.
Hankook iON evo SUV, 74 vs 62 on our treadwear score.
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology