Tests 79 · 1 test Owners 74 · 3 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 9 in 2024 EV Tyre Test (dry braking)
Head-to-head
Updated
Hankook iON evo SUV vs Hankook Dynapro H/T — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 1 + 0 road tests and 3 + 5 owner reviews. How we score
iON evo SUV is ahead, 77–52
Add your size for an exact match
/R
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 46 · 5 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
80
Dry
iON evo SUV +2753Why this score
Source iON evo SUV Dynapro H/T Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests 82 ≈ 59 (est.) Reviews found online 76 45 iON evo SUV: 60% × 81.8 + 40% × 76.3 = 80
Dynapro H/T: 60% × 58.6 (est.) + 40% × 45.4 = 53
No road tests of dry for Dynapro H/T. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
-
78
Wet
iON evo SUV +2454Why this score
Source iON evo SUV Dynapro H/T Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests 78 ≈ 58 (est.) Reviews found online 77 47 iON evo SUV: 60% × 77.7 + 40% × 77.3 = 78
Dynapro H/T: 60% × 57.7 (est.) + 40% × 47.2 = 54
No road tests of wet for Dynapro H/T. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
–
Snow
No comparison56Why this score
Source iON evo SUV Dynapro H/T Professional tests (TWG score) – ≈ 62 (est.) Reviews found online – 47 Dynapro H/T: 60% × 61.9 (est.) + 40% × 47 = 56
No road tests of snow for Dynapro H/T. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).
-
71
Comfort
iON evo SUV +1853Why this score
Source iON evo SUV Dynapro H/T Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 70 (est.) ≈ 65 (est.) Reviews found online 73 45 iON evo SUV: 40% × 69.7 (est.) + 60% × 72.5 = 71
Dynapro H/T: 40% × 64.8 (est.) + 60% × 45.1 = 53
No road tests of comfort for iON evo SUV or Dynapro H/T. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
77
Noise
No comparison–Why this score
Source iON evo SUV Dynapro H/T Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests 83 – Reviews found online ≈ 67 (est.) – iON evo SUV: 60% × 83.3 + 40% × 66.6 (est.) = 77
No owner ratings of noise for iON evo SUV. The owner half is the owners’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.
-
74
Treadwear
iON evo SUV +2153Why this score
Source iON evo SUV Dynapro H/T Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests 78 ≈ 58 (est.) Reviews found online 69 44 iON evo SUV: 60% × 77.6 + 40% × 69 = 74
Dynapro H/T: 60% × 58.3 (est.) + 40% × 43.9 = 53
No road tests of treadwear for Dynapro H/T. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
-
75
Handling (owners)
iON evo SUV +3243Why this score
Source iON evo SUV Dynapro H/T Reviews found online 75 43 -
74
Efficiency
No comparison–Why this score
Source iON evo SUV Dynapro H/T Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests 74 –
Scores at a glance
| Category | Hankook iON evo SUV | Hankook Dynapro H/T |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 77 | 52 |
| Dry | 80 | 53 |
| Wet | 78 | 54 |
| Snow | – | 56 |
| Comfort | 71 | 53 |
| Noise | 77 | – |
| Treadwear | 74 | 53 |
| Handling (owners) | 75 | 43 |
| Efficiency | 74 | – |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Recomputed
Headline score
77
/ 100
iON evo SUV
52
/ 100
Dynapro H/T
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A iON evo SUV
Pros
- Significantly quieter and smoother ride compared to OEM or competitor tires
- Improved energy efficiency and fuel economy (mpg)
- Excellent value for money, offering high performance at a lower price point than competitors like Michelin
Cons
- Tread wear is rated as only average, with users estimating a moderate total lifespan on heavier vehicles
Tire B Dynapro H/T
Pros
- Exceptionally low noise levels and quiet ride
- High comfort and smooth highway performance
- Balanced wet and dry braking for casual driving
Cons
- Terrible winter and snow traction due to hard rubber compound
- Poor wet traction leading to wheel spin on acceleration
- Severe balancing and out-of-round issues reported by some users
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Hankook iON evo SUV | B · Hankook Dynapro H/T |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | All Season |
| Vehicle type | SUV and 4x4 | SUV and 4x4 |
| Sizes available | 56 | 5 |
| Rim diameters | 17″ – 23″ | 16″ – 20″ |
| Sizes in common | 0 | 0 |
Which one should you actually buy?
77
/ 100
Hankook iON evo SUV
52
/ 100
Hankook Dynapro H/T
Winner: Hankook iON evo SUV — better handling, dry and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score. Hankook iON evo SUV rests on little evidence so far (1 test, 3 reviews), so read this result as provisional. Hankook Dynapro H/T rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 5 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Pick tire A
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Hankook iON evo SUV scores 75 vs 43 on handling.
Pick tire A
You want the most grip on dry roads
Hankook iON evo SUV scores 80 vs 53 on dry.
Pick tire A
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Hankook iON evo SUV scores 78 vs 54 on wet.
Pick tire A
You want the longest tread life
Hankook iON evo SUV scores 74 vs 53 on treadwear.
Tire A · Hankook iON evo SUV
Tire B · Hankook Dynapro H/T
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
iON evo SUV or Dynapro H/T?
Which is better in the wet, iON evo SUV or Dynapro H/T?
Hankook iON evo SUV, 78 vs 54 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, iON evo SUV or Dynapro H/T?
Hankook iON evo SUV, 80 vs 53 on our dry score.
Which is more comfortable, iON evo SUV or Dynapro H/T?
Hankook iON evo SUV, 71 vs 53 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, iON evo SUV or Dynapro H/T?
Hankook iON evo SUV, 74 vs 53 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology