Tests – · 1 test Owners 53 · 16 reviews
Best test result: #4 of 19 in 2022 Consumer Reports Ultra High Performance All-Season Tires (tested tread life (miles))
Head-to-head
Updated
Laufenn S FIT AS vs Hankook Dynapro H/T — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 1 + 0 road tests and 16 + 5 owner reviews. How we score
S FIT AS is ahead, 59–53
Add your size for an exact match
/R
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 45 · 5 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
60
Dry
S FIT AS +753Why this score
Source S FIT AS Dynapro H/T Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 63 (est.) ≈ 58 (est.) Reviews found online 55 45 S FIT AS: 60% × 62.7 (est.) + 40% × 55.3 = 60
Dynapro H/T: 60% × 58.4 (est.) + 40% × 44.7 = 53
No road tests of dry for S FIT AS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
No road tests of dry for Dynapro H/T. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
-
58
Wet
S FIT AS +553Why this score
Source S FIT AS Dynapro H/T Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 61 (est.) ≈ 58 (est.) Reviews found online 54 47 S FIT AS: 60% × 61.4 (est.) + 40% × 53.7 = 58
Dynapro H/T: 60% × 57.8 (est.) + 40% × 47 = 53
No road tests of wet for S FIT AS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
No road tests of wet for Dynapro H/T. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
50
Snow
Dynapro H/T +656Why this score
Source S FIT AS Dynapro H/T Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 60 (est.) ≈ 63 (est.) Reviews found online 37 47 S FIT AS: 60% × 59.7 (est.) + 40% × 36.6 = 50
Dynapro H/T: 60% × 62.9 (est.) + 40% × 46.6 = 56
No road tests of snow for S FIT AS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
No road tests of snow for Dynapro H/T. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
-
61
Comfort
S FIT AS +952Why this score
Source S FIT AS Dynapro H/T Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 66 (est.) ≈ 64 (est.) Reviews found online 58 45 S FIT AS: 40% × 66.5 (est.) + 60% × 57.9 = 61
Dynapro H/T: 40% × 63.8 (est.) + 60% × 44.5 = 52
No road tests of comfort for S FIT AS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
No road tests of comfort for Dynapro H/T. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
-
67
Treadwear
S FIT AS +1453Why this score
Source S FIT AS Dynapro H/T Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests 75 ≈ 58 (est.) Reviews found online 56 44 S FIT AS: 60% × 74.9 + 40% × 56.4 = 67
Dynapro H/T: 60% × 58.5 (est.) + 40% × 44.3 = 53
No road tests of treadwear for Dynapro H/T. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
-
55
Handling (owners)
S FIT AS +1243Why this score
Source S FIT AS Dynapro H/T Reviews found online 55 43
Scores at a glance
| Category | Laufenn S FIT AS | Hankook Dynapro H/T |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 59 | 53 |
| Dry | 60 | 53 |
| Wet | 58 | 53 |
| Snow | 50 | 56 |
| Comfort | 61 | 52 |
| Treadwear | 67 | 53 |
| Handling (owners) | 55 | 43 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
59
/ 100
S FIT AS
53
/ 100
Dynapro H/T
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A S FIT AS
Pros
- Exceptional value for the price compared to ultra-budget alternatives
- Very quiet and comfortable ride quality
- Good grip and handling in dry conditions
Cons
- Subpar wet-weather grip, with tendencies to lose traction easily under acceleration
- Wet performance degrades noticeably after 50% wear
- Concerns regarding rapid tread wear or limited lifespan
Tire B Dynapro H/T
Pros
- Exceptionally low noise levels and quiet ride
- High comfort and smooth highway performance
- Balanced wet and dry braking for casual driving
Cons
- Terrible winter and snow traction due to hard rubber compound
- Poor wet traction leading to wheel spin on acceleration
- Severe balancing and out-of-round issues reported by some users
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Laufenn S FIT AS | B · Hankook Dynapro H/T |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All Season | All Season |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | SUV and 4x4 |
| Sizes available | — | 5 |
| Rim diameters | — | 16″ – 20″ |
| UTQG | 500 A A | 500 - 700 A - B A - B |
Which one should you actually buy?
59
/ 100
Laufenn S FIT AS
53
/ 100
Hankook Dynapro H/T
Winner: Laufenn S FIT AS — better treadwear, handling and comfort. Pick the Hankook Dynapro H/T if snow matters most to you. Laufenn S FIT AS rests on little evidence so far (1 test, 16 reviews), so read this result as provisional. Hankook Dynapro H/T rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 5 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Pick tire A
You want the longest tread life
Laufenn S FIT AS scores 67 vs 53 on treadwear.
Pick tire A
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Laufenn S FIT AS scores 55 vs 43 on handling.
Pick tire A
You want the most comfortable ride
Laufenn S FIT AS scores 61 vs 52 on comfort.
Pick tire A
You want the most grip on dry roads
Laufenn S FIT AS scores 60 vs 53 on dry.
Tire A · Laufenn S FIT AS
Tire B · Hankook Dynapro H/T
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
S FIT AS or Dynapro H/T?
Which is better in the wet, S FIT AS or Dynapro H/T?
Laufenn S FIT AS, 58 vs 53 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, S FIT AS or Dynapro H/T?
Laufenn S FIT AS, 60 vs 53 on our dry score.
Which is better in snow, S FIT AS or Dynapro H/T?
Hankook Dynapro H/T, 56 vs 50 on our snow score.
Which is more comfortable, S FIT AS or Dynapro H/T?
Laufenn S FIT AS, 61 vs 52 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, S FIT AS or Dynapro H/T?
Laufenn S FIT AS, 67 vs 53 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology