Tests – · 1 test Owners 58 · 16 reviews
Head-to-head
Updated
Laufenn S FIT AS vs Hankook Dynapro H/T — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): 60% professional tests, 40% owner reviews.
S FIT AS is ahead, 63–57
Add your size for an exact match
/R
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 53 · 5 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
64
Dry
S FIT AS +757Why this score
Source S FIT AS Dynapro H/T Reviews found online 62 51 -
62
Wet
S FIT AS +260Why this score
Source S FIT AS Dynapro H/T Reviews found online 59 57 -
52
Snow
Dynapro H/T +759Why this score
Source S FIT AS Dynapro H/T Reviews found online 41 52 -
66
Comfort
S FIT AS +363Why this score
Source S FIT AS Dynapro H/T Reviews found online 63 56 -
64
Noise
No comparison–Why this score
Source S FIT AS Dynapro H/T Reviews found online 61 – -
69
Treadwear
S FIT AS +1158Why this score
Source S FIT AS Dynapro H/T Professional tests (TWG score) 74 – Reviews found online 61 52 -
61
Handling
S FIT AS +1348Why this score
Source S FIT AS Dynapro H/T Reviews found online 61 48
Scores at a glance
| Category | Laufenn S FIT AS | Hankook Dynapro H/T |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 63 | 57 |
| Dry | 64 | 57 |
| Wet | 62 | 60 |
| Snow | 52 | 59 |
| Comfort | 66 | 63 |
| Noise | 64 | – |
| Treadwear | 69 | 58 |
| Handling | 61 | 48 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Less important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Less important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neither tire has a score here yet, so this weight changes nothing.
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
63
/ 100
S FIT AS
57
/ 100
Dynapro H/T
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A S FIT AS
Pros
- Exceptional value for the price compared to ultra-budget alternatives
- Very quiet and comfortable ride quality
- Good grip and handling in dry conditions
Cons
- Subpar wet-weather grip, with tendencies to lose traction easily under acceleration
- Wet performance degrades noticeably after 50% wear
- Concerns regarding rapid tread wear or limited lifespan
Tire B Dynapro H/T
Pros
- Exceptionally low noise levels and quiet ride
- High comfort and smooth highway performance
- Balanced wet and dry braking for casual driving
Cons
- Terrible winter and snow traction due to hard rubber compound
- Poor wet traction leading to wheel spin on acceleration
- Severe balancing and out-of-round issues reported by some users
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Laufenn S FIT AS | B · Hankook Dynapro H/T |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All Season | All Season |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | SUV and 4x4 |
| Sizes available | — | 5 |
| Rim diameters | — | 16″ – 20″ |
Which one should you actually buy?
63
/ 100
Laufenn S FIT AS
57
/ 100
Hankook Dynapro H/T
Winner: Laufenn S FIT AS — better handling, treadwear and dry. Pick the Hankook Dynapro H/T if snow matters most to you.
Pick tire A
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Laufenn S FIT AS scores 61 vs 48 on handling.
Pick tire A
You want the longest tread life
Laufenn S FIT AS scores 69 vs 58 on treadwear.
Pick tire A
You want the most grip on dry roads
Laufenn S FIT AS scores 64 vs 57 on dry.
Pick tire B
You drive through snowy winters
Hankook Dynapro H/T scores 59 vs 52 on snow.
Tire A · Laufenn S FIT AS
Tire B · Hankook Dynapro H/T
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.