Tests 68 · 3 tests Owners 66 · 13 reviews
Hankook Kinergy 4S vs Nexen N'Fera RU5 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): 60% professional tests, 40% owner reviews.
N'Fera RU5 is ahead, 72–67
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 73 · 16 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
68
Dry
N'Fera RU5 +674Why this score
Source Kinergy 4S N'Fera RU5 Professional tests (TWG score) 70 – Reviews found online 65 77 -
72
Wet
N'Fera RU5 +375Why this score
Source Kinergy 4S N'Fera RU5 Professional tests (TWG score) 74 – Reviews found online 69 77 -
69
Snow
Kinergy 4S +960Why this score
Source Kinergy 4S N'Fera RU5 Professional tests (TWG score) 66 – Reviews found online 73 54 -
68
Comfort
N'Fera RU5 +674Why this score
Source Kinergy 4S N'Fera RU5 Reviews found online 67 80 -
61
Noise
N'Fera RU5 +869Why this score
Source Kinergy 4S N'Fera RU5 Professional tests (TWG score) 57 – Reviews found online – 74 -
63
Treadwear
N'Fera RU5 +770Why this score
Source Kinergy 4S N'Fera RU5 Professional tests (TWG score) 62 – Reviews found online 63 73 -
63
Handling
N'Fera RU5 +1477Why this score
Source Kinergy 4S N'Fera RU5 Reviews found online 63 77
Scores at a glance
| Category | Hankook Kinergy 4S | Nexen N'Fera RU5 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 67 | 72 |
| Dry | 68 | 74 |
| Wet | 72 | 75 |
| Snow | 69 | 60 |
| Comfort | 68 | 74 |
| Noise | 61 | 69 |
| Treadwear | 63 | 70 |
| Handling | 63 | 77 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Kinergy 4S
N'Fera RU5
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Kinergy 4S
Pros
- Exceptional grip and stability in wet and torrential rain conditions
- Strong performance in snow and slush, often cited as a viable alternative to dedicated winter tires
- High value-for-money proposition compared to premium competitors
Cons
- Reports of premature tread wear and shorter-than-expected service life
- Inconsistent dry-road handling and feedback compared to dedicated summer tires
- Occasional reports of poor traction on greasy or specific wet road surfaces
Tire B N'Fera RU5
Pros
- Exceptional value and significantly lower price point compared to major competitor brands
- Impressive tread life and durability, with some users reporting high mileage and slow wear rates
- Strong grip and confident handling on both dry and wet roads
Cons
- Subpar traction and performance in snow and winter conditions, with specific complaints regarding ice and snow handling
- Noise levels are average, with some users noting they are not exceptionally quiet
- Mixed reviews on specialized winter-weather safety outside of mild rainy climates
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Hankook Kinergy 4S | B · Nexen N'Fera RU5 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All Season | Summer Ultra High Performance tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 67 | 4 |
| Rim diameters | 13″ – 18″ | 16″ – 18″ |
| Tread depth | — | 10/32″ |
| UTQG | — | 500 A A |
| Treadwear warranty | — | 65,000 mi |
| Sidewall | — | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | — | 51 psi |
Which one should you actually buy?
Hankook Kinergy 4S
Nexen N'Fera RU5
Winner: Nexen N'Fera RU5 — better handling, noise and treadwear. Pick the Hankook Kinergy 4S if snow matters most to you.
Nexen N'Fera RU5 scores 77 vs 63 on handling.
Hankook Kinergy 4S scores 69 vs 60 on snow.
Nexen N'Fera RU5 scores 69 vs 61 on noise.
Nexen N'Fera RU5 scores 70 vs 63 on treadwear.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.