tirewheelguide
Head-to-head Updated

Hankook Kinergy 4S vs Yokohama C Drive2 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 3 + 0 road tests and 13 + 31 owner reviews. How we score

Kinergy 4S leads, 68–64 Narrow edge

Check price on Amazon · Kinergy 4S or C Drive2 on Amazon
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Hankook Kinergy 4S
Tire AHankook

Kinergy 4S

All Season

Tests 67 · 3 tests Owners 67 · 13 reviews

Best test result: #3 of 11 in 2017 All Season VS Winter Tyre Test (dry braking)

Yokohama C Drive2
Tire BYokohama

C Drive2

Summer

Tests – · none yet Owners 62 · 31 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 68

    Dry

    Kinergy 4S +5
    63
    Why this score
    SourceKinergy 4SC Drive2
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 3 / – tests70≈ 65 (est.)
    Reviews found online6661

    Kinergy 4S: 60% × 69.7 + 40% × 65.6 = 68

    C Drive2: 60% × 65 (est.) + 40% × 61 = 63

    No road tests of dry for C Drive2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

  2. 72

    Wet

    Kinergy 4S +5
    67
    Why this score
    SourceKinergy 4SC Drive2
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 3 / – tests74≈ 68 (est.)
    Reviews found online6966

    Kinergy 4S: 60% × 73.8 + 40% × 68.7 = 72

    C Drive2: 60% × 67.6 (est.) + 40% × 65.8 = 67

    No road tests of wet for C Drive2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

  3. 69

    Snow

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceKinergy 4SC Drive2
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 2 / – tests66–
    Reviews found online73–

    Kinergy 4S: 60% × 66.2 + 40% × 72.8 = 69

  4. 68

    Comfort

    Level
    68
    Why this score
    SourceKinergy 4SC Drive2
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 69 (est.)≈ 69 (est.)
    Reviews found online6766

    Kinergy 4S: 60% × 68.7 (est.) + 40% × 66.7 = 68

    C Drive2: 60% × 68.6 (est.) + 40% × 66.1 = 68

    No road tests of comfort for Kinergy 4S or C Drive2. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 61

    Noise

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceKinergy 4SC Drive2
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 2 / – tests56–
    Reviews found online≈ 67 (est.)–

    Kinergy 4S: 60% × 56.2 + 40% × 67.3 (est.) = 61

    No owner ratings of noise for Kinergy 4S. The owner half is the owners’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.

  6. 63

    Treadwear

    Kinergy 4S +1
    62
    Why this score
    SourceKinergy 4SC Drive2
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests62≈ 64 (est.)
    Reviews found online6360

    Kinergy 4S: 60% × 62.4 + 40% × 63.2 = 63

    C Drive2: 60% × 63.9 (est.) + 40% × 59.9 = 62

    No road tests of treadwear for C Drive2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

  7. 63

    Handling (owners)

    Kinergy 4S +2
    61
    Why this score
    SourceKinergy 4SC Drive2
    Reviews found online6361
Scores at a glance
CategoryHankook Kinergy 4SYokohama C Drive2
Relative Score 68 64
Dry 68 63
Wet 72 67
Snow 69 –
Comfort 68 68
Noise 61 –
Treadwear 63 62
Handling (owners) 63 61

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Kinergy 4S

C Drive2

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

The professional test results behind the scores

Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.

DisciplineCategoryKinergy 4SC Drive2ΔHead-to-head
Also published by the testers (not in the score)
Overall Ranking Overall #12/30 2025 All Season 30 Tyre Braking Test #7/10 2015 Auto Bild 215/55 R16 Technical Tyre Test – Different tests

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Kinergy 4S

Pros

  • Exceptional grip and stability in wet and torrential rain conditions
  • Strong performance in snow and slush, often cited as a viable alternative to dedicated winter tires
  • High value-for-money proposition compared to premium competitors

Cons

  • Reports of premature tread wear and shorter-than-expected service life
  • Inconsistent dry-road handling and feedback compared to dedicated summer tires
  • Occasional reports of poor traction on greasy or specific wet road surfaces
All owner themes in the Kinergy 4S review

Tire B C Drive2

Pros

  • Exceptional ride comfort and vibration damping
  • Low road noise levels
  • Strong wet weather performance for most users

Cons

  • Inconsistent tread life, with some users reporting rapid wear
  • Handling can feel vague or lack feedback for performance-oriented drivers
  • Sudden loss of grip at the limit
All owner themes in the C Drive2 review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Hankook Kinergy 4S B · Yokohama C Drive2
CategoryAll SeasonSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available673
Rim diameters13″ – 18″16″ – 18″
Sizes in common33

Which one should you actually buy?

Hankook Kinergy 4S

Yokohama C Drive2

Narrow edge: Hankook Kinergy 4S — better dry and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

Hankook Kinergy 4S scores 68 vs 63 on dry.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Hankook Kinergy 4S scores 72 vs 67 on wet.

Tire A · Hankook Kinergy 4S
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Yokohama C Drive2
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Kinergy 4S or C Drive2?

Which is better in the wet, Kinergy 4S or C Drive2?

Hankook Kinergy 4S, 72 vs 67 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Kinergy 4S or C Drive2?

Hankook Kinergy 4S, 68 vs 63 on our dry score.

Which is more comfortable, Kinergy 4S or C Drive2?

Neither, by our numbers: 68 vs 68 on the comfort score, within 3 points.

Which lasts longer, Kinergy 4S or C Drive2?

Neither, by our numbers: 63 vs 62 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology