Hankook Kinergy 4S2 vs Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 24 + 19 road tests and 3,636 + 3,359 owner reviews. How we score
Best test result: #1 of 16 in 2026 ADAC All Season Tyre Test - 185/65 R15 (curved aquaplaning)
“Zimske gume - premium ili neka srednja klasa? Nakon 2 proklizavanja u skretanju ovaj vikend (po kiši) zaključila sam da je vrijeme da kupim nove gume. Otkako sam uzela auto (prosinac 2022.) imam jedne te iste cjelogodišnje gume, Hankook Kinergy 4S2, 225/45/R17. Prošlu zimu kad je bilo snijega jedva sam kući s posla išla koliko sam se klizala po ulici, kiša još nekako ali snijeg i led katastrofa. Ove godine je i na kiši počeo proklizavati. Auto je zadnji pogon, 115ks ništa specijalno. Ono što me zanima je koliko ima smisla uzeti neke premium gume obzirom da godišnje radim oko 15k kilometara, većinski po gradu (Slavonija), tu i tamo autoput do Zg, možda 2 puta godišnje Mađarska/Austrija/Slovenija. Vidim da svi hvale Continental Wintercontact TS870 ali poprilično su skupe pa imate li možda preporuku za nešto jeftinije, a kvalitetno? Više me zanima da su dobre za kišu jer snijega nema nešto specijalno i sve će biti bolje nego ove koje sad imam. Što se dimenzije tiče imam jedne alu felge pa bih onda uzela istu dimenziju čisto da se ne moram izut iz cipela zbog troškova s kupovanjem još i felgi. TLDR: Zimska guma, 225/45/R17, zadnji pogon, što kupiti? Read more”
Best test result: #1 of 45 in 2019 Summer 53 Tyre Braking Shootout (wet braking)
“Tire preferences? My MK8 has a little over 18,000 miles now and the stock tires look like they’ve already gone to sh*t? Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 aren’t as good as they advertise? What do you recommend for tires?”
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
No owner ratings of noise for Kinergy 4S2 or Ventus S1 evo3. The owner half is the owners’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.
67
Treadwear
Kinergy 4S2 +14
53
Why this score
Source
Kinergy 4S2
Ventus S1 evo3
Professional tests (TWG score) · 9 / 4 tests
71
61
Reviews found online
60
40
Kinergy 4S2:60% × 71.5 + 40% × 59.5 = 67
Ventus S1 evo3:60% × 60.7 + 40% × 40.4 = 53
56
Handling (owners)
Ventus S1 evo3 +2
58
Why this score
Source
Kinergy 4S2
Ventus S1 evo3
Reviews found online
56
58
54
Efficiency
Ventus S1 evo3 +14
68
Why this score
Source
Kinergy 4S2
Ventus S1 evo3
Professional tests (TWG score) · 18 / 15 tests
54
68
Scores at a glance
Hankook Kinergy 4S2 vs Hankook Ventus S1 evo3: scores by category (0–100)
Category
Hankook Kinergy 4S2
Hankook Ventus S1 evo3
Relative Score
70
68
Dry
72
75
Wet
78
81
Snow
72
–
Comfort
64
59
Noise
66
73
Treadwear
67
53
Handling (owners)
56
58
Efficiency
54
68
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
70
/ 100
± 4
Kinergy 4S2
68
/ 100
± 6
Ventus S1 evo3
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
The professional test results behind the scores
Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.
Discipline
Category
Kinergy 4S2
Ventus S1 evo3
Δ
Head-to-head
Dry Braking
Dry
94%#7/16 · 2026 ADAC All Season Tyre Test - 185/65 R15
96%#7/8 · 2025 Die Reifentester UHP Summer Tyre Test
–
Different tests
Dry Handling
Dry
100%#1/9 · 2025 Auto Bild All Season Camper Van Tyre Test
98%#7/9 · 2024 AZ Summer Tyre Test
–
Different tests
Dry Handling (tester's mark)
Dry
95%#3/9 · 2026 Die Reifentester All Season Tyre Test - 225/40 R18
60%#8/8 · 2025 Die Reifentester UHP Summer Tyre Test
–
Different tests
Curved Aquaplaning
Wet
100%#1/16 · 2026 ADAC All Season Tyre Test - 185/65 R15
87%#6/7 · 2024 Auto Express Summer Tyre Test
–
Different tests
Straight Aquaplaning
Wet
97%#3/16 · 2026 ADAC All Season Tyre Test - 185/65 R15
98%#8/8 · 2025 Die Reifentester UHP Summer Tyre Test
–
Different tests
Wet Braking
Wet
89%#12/16 · 2026 ADAC All Season Tyre Test - 185/65 R15
94%#6/8 · 2025 Die Reifentester UHP Summer Tyre Test
–
Different tests
Wet Circle
Wet
98%#4/15 · 2025 AutoBild All Season Tyre Test
98%#5/9 · 2024 AZ Summer Tyre Test
–
Different tests
Wet Handling
Wet
98%#7/9 · 2025 Auto Bild All Season Camper Van Tyre Test
100%#2/9 · 2024 AZ Summer Tyre Test
–
Different tests
Wet Handling (tester's mark)
Wet
91%#6/9 · 2026 Die Reifentester All Season Tyre Test - 225/40 R18
80%#3/8 · 2025 Die Reifentester UHP Summer Tyre Test
–
Different tests
Comfort (tester's mark)
Comfort
88%#8/9 · 2026 Die Reifentester All Season Tyre Test - 225/40 R18
100%#2/8 · 2025 Die Reifentester UHP Summer Tyre Test
–
Different tests
Noise
Noise
96%#14/16 · 2026 ADAC All Season Tyre Test - 185/65 R15
100%#1/9 · 2024 AZ Summer Tyre Test
–
Different tests
Noise (tester's mark)
Noise
91%#7/9 · 2026 Die Reifentester All Season Tyre Test - 225/40 R18
100%#2/8 · 2025 Die Reifentester UHP Summer Tyre Test
–
Different tests
Wear
Treadwear
97%#2/16 · 2026 ADAC All Season Tyre Test - 185/65 R15
56%#13/20 · 2023 AutoBild UHP Summer Tyre Test
–
Different tests
Rolling Resistance
Efficiency
86%#8/9 · 2026 Die Reifentester All Season Tyre Test - 225/40 R18
97%#3/8 · 2025 Die Reifentester UHP Summer Tyre Test
–
Different tests
Also published by the testers (not in the score)
Price
Cost
74%#3/12 · 2024 Minivan / SUV All Season Tyre Test
74%#6/13 · 2023 AutoBild Sports Car Summer Tyre Test
–
Different tests
Total Cost of Ownership
Cost
#7/152025 AutoBild All Season Tyre Test
#14/202023 AutoBild UHP Summer Tyre Test
–
Different tests
Value
Cost
81%#6/15 · 2025 AutoBild All Season Tyre Test
58%#15/20 · 2023 AutoBild UHP Summer Tyre Test
–
Different tests
Overall Ranking
Overall
#5/162026 ADAC All Season Tyre Test - 185/65 R15
#6/82025 Die Reifentester UHP Summer Tyre Test
–
Different tests
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Kinergy 4S2
Pros
Exceptional wet weather grip, braking, and aquaplaning resistance
Strong performance and confidence in cold temperatures, light snow, and slush
High overall value for money compared to premium tier alternatives
Cons
Increased road noise and occasional highway 'whining' or howling between 120-140 km/h
Some reports of faster-than-expected tread wear or uneven inner tread deformation
Softer sidewalls can induce initial steering delay or a slight floating feel during aggressive cornering
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Tire A
Hankook Kinergy 4S2
Mixed
Community members frequently view the Hankook Kinergy 4S 2 as a solid, budget-friendly alternative to premium all-weather tires like the Michelin CrossClimate 2, highlighting its strong wet traction and good snow performance for the price. However, users report mixed experiences regarding tread longevity, with some noting rapid or uneven wear, as well as drawbacks such as highway humming noise, a stiff ride, and twitchy handling on ice.
#Affordable CrossClimate alternative#Wet weather traction#Snow and winter performance#Tread wear longevity#Cabin road noise#Ride stiffness and comfort
Based on 33 community posts
Tire B
Hankook Ventus S1 evo3
Mixed
Community sentiment toward the Hankook Ventus S1 Evo 3 is mixed, with users frequently praising its strong dry and wet grip, comfort, and competitive pricing. However, notable drawbacks include relatively fast tread wear, reports of increasing road noise over time, and mixed experiences with OEM specs versus premium competitors like Michelin.
#Wet and dry grip#Value for money#Road noise levels#Tread wear and longevity#OEM fitments and EV variants#Run-flat identification confusion#Ride comfort
Based on 33 community posts
Specs side by side
Attribute
A · Hankook Kinergy 4S2
B · Hankook Ventus S1 evo3
Category
All Season
Summer
Vehicle type
Passenger Car / Crossover
Passenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available
95
110
Rim diameters
14″ – 20″
17″ – 22″
Sizes in common
39
39
Which one should you actually buy?
70
/ 100
Hankook Kinergy 4S2
68
/ 100
Hankook Ventus S1 evo3
Narrow edge: Hankook Kinergy 4S2 — better treadwear and comfort. Pick the Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 if efficiency, noise and dry matter most to you.
Pick tire AYou want the longest tread life
Hankook Kinergy 4S2 scores 67 vs 53 on treadwear.
Pick tire BYou want lower fuel or energy use
Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 scores 68 vs 54 on efficiency.
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology