Head-to-head Updated

Hankook Kinergy 4S2 vs Hankook Ventus V2 Concept — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 27 + 0 road tests and 3,659 + 12 owner reviews. How we score

Kinergy 4S2 is ahead, 71–60

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Hankook Kinergy 4S2
Tire AHankook

Kinergy 4S2

All Season

± 4

Tests 78 · 27 tests Owners 60 · 3,659 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 16 in 2026 ADAC All Season Tyre Test - 185/65 R15 (curved aquaplaning)

“Zimske gume - premium ili neka srednja klasa? Nakon 2 proklizavanja u skretanju ovaj vikend (po kiši) zaključila sam da je vrijeme da kupim nove gume. Otkako sam uzela auto (prosinac 2022.) imam jedne te iste cjelogodišnje gume, Hankook Kinergy 4S2, 225/45/R17. Prošlu zimu kad je bilo snijega jedva sam kući s posla išla koliko sam se klizala po ulici, kiša još nekako ali snijeg i led katastrofa. Ove godine je i na kiši počeo proklizavati. Auto je zadnji pogon, 115ks ništa specijalno. Ono što me zanima je koliko ima smisla uzeti neke premium gume obzirom da godišnje radim oko 15k kilometara, većinski po gradu (Slavonija), tu i tamo autoput do Zg, možda 2 puta godišnje Mađarska/Austrija/Slovenija. Vidim da svi hvale Continental Wintercontact TS870 ali poprilično su skupe pa imate li možda preporuku za nešto jeftinije, a kvalitetno? Više me zanima da su dobre za kišu jer snijega nema nešto specijalno i sve će biti bolje nego ove koje sad imam. Što se dimenzije tiče imam jedne alu felge pa bih onda uzela istu dimenziju čisto da se ne moram izut iz cipela zbog troškova s kupovanjem još i felgi. TLDR: Zimska guma, 225/45/R17, zadnji pogon, što kupiti? Read more”

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 72

    Dry

    Kinergy 4S2 +9
    63
    Why this score
    SourceKinergy 4S2Ventus V2 Concept
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 26 / – tests83≈ 65 (est.)
    Reviews found online5660

    Kinergy 4S2: 60% × 82.9 + 40% × 56 = 72

    Ventus V2 Concept: 60% × 64.6 (est.) + 40% × 59.8 = 63

    No road tests of dry for Ventus V2 Concept. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

  2. 78

    Wet

    Kinergy 4S2 +14
    64
    Why this score
    SourceKinergy 4S2Ventus V2 Concept
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 26 / – tests87≈ 66 (est.)
    Reviews found online6562

    Kinergy 4S2: 60% × 86.8 + 40% × 64.9 = 78

    Ventus V2 Concept: 60% × 66 (est.) + 40% × 62.1 = 64

    No road tests of wet for Ventus V2 Concept. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 72

    Snow

    Kinergy 4S2 +25
    47
    Why this score
    SourceKinergy 4S2Ventus V2 Concept
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 21 / – tests79≈ 58 (est.)
    Reviews found online6130

    Kinergy 4S2: 60% × 78.6 + 40% × 60.9 = 72

    Ventus V2 Concept: 60% × 57.7 (est.) + 40% × 30.1 = 47

    No road tests of snow for Ventus V2 Concept. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

  4. 61

    Comfort

    Level
    61
    Why this score
    SourceKinergy 4S2Ventus V2 Concept
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 7 / – tests72≈ 66 (est.)
    Reviews found online5457

    Kinergy 4S2: 40% × 71.6 + 60% × 54.4 = 61

    Ventus V2 Concept: 40% × 66.3 (est.) + 60% × 56.9 = 61

    No road tests of comfort for Ventus V2 Concept. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

  5. 64

    Noise

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceKinergy 4S2Ventus V2 Concept
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 21 / – tests62–
    Reviews found online≈ 66 (est.)–

    Kinergy 4S2: 60% × 61.6 + 40% × 66.4 (est.) = 64

    No owner ratings of noise for Kinergy 4S2. The owner half is the owners’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.

  6. 67

    Treadwear

    Kinergy 4S2 +6
    61
    Why this score
    SourceKinergy 4S2Ventus V2 Concept
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 10 / – tests72≈ 63 (est.)
    Reviews found online6057

    Kinergy 4S2: 60% × 72.5 + 40% × 59.7 = 67

    Ventus V2 Concept: 60% × 63.2 (est.) + 40% × 57.3 = 61

    No road tests of treadwear for Ventus V2 Concept. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

  7. 56

    Handling (owners)

    Ventus V2 Concept +3
    59
    Why this score
    SourceKinergy 4S2Ventus V2 Concept
    Reviews found online5659
  8. 51

    Efficiency

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceKinergy 4S2Ventus V2 Concept
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 21 / – tests51–
Scores at a glance
Hankook Kinergy 4S2 vs Hankook Ventus V2 Concept: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryHankook Kinergy 4S2Hankook Ventus V2 Concept
Relative Score 71 60
Dry 72 63
Wet 78 64
Snow 72 47
Comfort 61 61
Noise 64 –
Treadwear 67 61
Handling (owners) 56 59
Efficiency 51 –

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Recomputed
Headline score
± 4

Kinergy 4S2

± 8

Ventus V2 Concept

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Kinergy 4S2

Pros

  • Exceptional wet weather grip, braking, and aquaplaning resistance
  • Strong performance and confidence in cold temperatures, light snow, and slush
  • High overall value for money compared to premium tier alternatives

Cons

  • Increased road noise and occasional highway 'whining' or howling between 120-140 km/h
  • Some reports of faster-than-expected tread wear or uneven inner tread deformation
  • Softer sidewalls can induce initial steering delay or a slight floating feel during aggressive cornering
All owner themes in the Kinergy 4S2 review

Tire B Ventus V2 Concept

Pros

  • Excellent handling and cornering performance on dry surfaces
  • High value for money and affordability for budget-conscious buyers
  • Impressive tread life and longevity, with some users reporting up to 70,000 km of use

Cons

  • Becomes significantly noisy as the tire ages and wears
  • Poor grip in snow and ice conditions
  • Durability issues including sidewall wear and vulnerability to curb damage
All owner themes in the Ventus V2 Concept review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Hankook Kinergy 4S2

Mixed

The Hankook Kinergy 4S2 is widely regarded as a good-value 3PMSF all-weather tire, often recommended as a cheaper alternative to the Michelin CrossClimate 2 thanks to strong wet performance and good independent test results. Complaints include a stiff ride, highway road noise, fast or uneven tread wear, and weaker snow and ice grip for some owners. Several users noted that ice performance wasn't tested and that it suits milder, wet climates best.

Top themes
#Value vs CrossClimate 2#Wet traction#Snow and ice grip#Tread wear concerns#Ride comfort stiffness#Road noise#Tyre Reviews test results#EV and range use

Based on 34 community posts

Tire B

Hankook Ventus V2 Concept

We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Hankook Kinergy 4S2 B · Hankook Ventus V2 Concept
CategoryAll SeasonAll Season
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available95—
Rim diameters14″ – 20″—
UTQG500 A A500 AA A

Which one should you actually buy?

Hankook Kinergy 4S2

Hankook Ventus V2 Concept

Winner: Hankook Kinergy 4S2 — better snow, wet and dry. Where the Hankook Ventus V2 Concept is ahead, it is by less than 3 points. Hankook Ventus V2 Concept rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 12 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire A You drive through snowy winters

Hankook Kinergy 4S2 scores 72 vs 47 on snow.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Hankook Kinergy 4S2 scores 78 vs 64 on wet.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

Hankook Kinergy 4S2 scores 72 vs 63 on dry.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

Hankook Kinergy 4S2 scores 67 vs 61 on treadwear.

Tire A · Hankook Kinergy 4S2
Tire B · Hankook Ventus V2 Concept

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Kinergy 4S2 or Ventus V2 Concept?

Which is better in the wet, Kinergy 4S2 or Ventus V2 Concept?

Hankook Kinergy 4S2, 78 vs 64 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Kinergy 4S2 or Ventus V2 Concept?

Hankook Kinergy 4S2, 72 vs 63 on our dry score.

Which is better in snow, Kinergy 4S2 or Ventus V2 Concept?

Hankook Kinergy 4S2, 72 vs 47 on our snow score.

Which is more comfortable, Kinergy 4S2 or Ventus V2 Concept?

Neither, by our numbers: 61 vs 61 on the comfort score, within 3 points.

Which lasts longer, Kinergy 4S2 or Ventus V2 Concept?

Hankook Kinergy 4S2, 67 vs 61 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology