tirewheelguide
Head-to-head Updated

Hankook Kinergy 4S2 vs Laufenn G Fit 4S — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 27 + 6 road tests and 3,669 + 9 owner reviews. How we score

G Fit 4S is ahead, 75–70

Check price on Amazon · G Fit 4S or Kinergy 4S2 on Amazon
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Hankook Kinergy 4S2
Tire AHankook

Kinergy 4S2

All Season

± 4

Tests 78 · 27 tests Owners 60 · 3,669 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 16 in 2026 ADAC All Season Tyre Test - 185/65 R15 (curved aquaplaning)

“I had the Kinergy 4s2 tires and they were not good. They wore unevenly, especially on the outsides of the fronts and handling was poor. When cornering the tire felt like the sidewall was folding under which would explain the increased wear on the outside tread block of the tires . The alignment was verified to be perfect. Go with the CC2 or anything Nokian . I ran some old Nokian WRG2s and was very impressed. Id imagine the latest versions are also very good.”

Laufenn G Fit 4S
Tire BLaufenn

G Fit 4S

All Season

± 6

Tests 71 · 6 tests Owners 80 · 9 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 15 in 2025 AutoBild All Season Tyre Test (wet circle)

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

Key facts

  • In 3 tests that measured dry braking for both, Kinergy 4S2 won 3 and G Fit 4S won 0 (average 93% vs 88% of the best).
  • In 3 tests that measured wet braking for both, Kinergy 4S2 won 2 and G Fit 4S won 1 (average 92% vs 90% of the best).
  1. 72

    Dry

    Level
    72
    Why this score
    SourceKinergy 4S2G Fit 4S
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 26 / 6 tests8365
    Reviews found online5681
    Dry Braking (% of best) · 3 shared tests · wins 3–093%88%
    Dry Handling (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–199%100%

    Kinergy 4S2: 60% × 82.9 + 40% × 56 = 72

    G Fit 4S: 60% × 65.3 + 40% × 81.1 = 72

  2. 78

    Wet

    G Fit 4S +7
    85
    Why this score
    SourceKinergy 4S2G Fit 4S
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 26 / 6 tests8786
    Reviews found online6585
    Curved Aquaplaning (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 1–087%83%
    Straight Aquaplaning (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–191%94%
    Wet Braking (% of best) · 3 shared tests · wins 2–192%90%
    Wet Circle (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–198%100%
    Wet Handling (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–196%99%

    Kinergy 4S2: 60% × 86.8 + 40% × 64.9 = 78

    G Fit 4S: 60% × 85.7 + 40% × 84.9 = 85

  3. 71

    Snow

    G Fit 4S +6
    77
    Why this score
    SourceKinergy 4S2G Fit 4S
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 21 / 2 tests7977
    Reviews found online6177
    Snow Braking (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 1–094%93%
    Snow Circle (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 1–095%91%
    Snow Handling (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 1–096%95%
    Snow Traction (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 1–094%91%

    Kinergy 4S2: 60% × 78.6 + 40% × 60.8 = 71

    G Fit 4S: 60% × 76.7 + 40% × 76.9 = 77

  4. 61

    Comfort

    G Fit 4S +14
    75
    Why this score
    SourceKinergy 4S2G Fit 4S
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 7 / 1 tests7272
    Reviews found online5478

    Kinergy 4S2: 40% × 71.5 + 60% × 54.4 = 61

    G Fit 4S: 40% × 71.5 + 60% × 78 = 75

  5. 63

    Noise

    Kinergy 4S2 +25
    38
    Why this score
    SourceKinergy 4S2G Fit 4S
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 21 / 2 tests6218
    Reviews found online≈ 66 (est.)≈ 66 (est.)
    Noise (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 1–097%94%

    Kinergy 4S2: 60% × 61.6 + 40% × 66.3 (est.) = 63

    G Fit 4S: 60% × 18.4 + 40% × 66.3 (est.) = 38

    No owner ratings of noise for Kinergy 4S2 or G Fit 4S. The owner half is the owners’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.

  6. 67

    Treadwear

    G Fit 4S +8
    75
    Why this score
    SourceKinergy 4S2G Fit 4S
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 10 / 1 tests7272
    Reviews found online6079
    Abrasion (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 1–087%79%
    Wear (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 1–085%80%

    Kinergy 4S2: 60% × 72.5 + 40% × 59.6 = 67

    G Fit 4S: 60% × 72.4 + 40% × 78.5 = 75

  7. 56

    Handling (owners)

    G Fit 4S +23
    79
    Why this score
    SourceKinergy 4S2G Fit 4S
    Reviews found online5679
  8. 51

    Efficiency

    Kinergy 4S2 +4
    47
    Why this score
    SourceKinergy 4S2G Fit 4S
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 21 / 2 tests5147
    Rolling Resistance (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 1–088%81%
Scores at a glance
CategoryHankook Kinergy 4S2Laufenn G Fit 4S
Relative Score 70 75
Dry 72 72
Wet 78 85
Snow 71 77
Comfort 61 75
Noise 63 38
Treadwear 67 75
Handling (owners) 56 79
Efficiency 51 47

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 4

Kinergy 4S2

± 6

G Fit 4S

The professional test results behind the scores

Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.

In the overall rankings of 3 tests that ran both, Hankook Kinergy 4S2 finished ahead 3 times and Laufenn G Fit 4S 0 times.

DisciplineCategoryKinergy 4S2G Fit 4SΔHead-to-head
Dry Braking Dry 93% 88% +5.1 3–0 in 3 shared tests Newest: 2025 AutoBild All Season Tyre Test · 225/40 R18
Dry Handling Dry 99% 100% −0.4 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2025 AutoBild All Season Tyre Test · 225/40 R18
Curved Aquaplaning Wet 87% 83% +3.7 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2025 AutoBild All Season Tyre Test · 225/40 R18
Straight Aquaplaning Wet 91% 94% −2.5 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2025 AutoBild All Season Tyre Test · 225/40 R18
Wet Braking Wet 92% 90% +2.8 2–1 in 3 shared tests Newest: 2025 AutoBild All Season Tyre Test · 225/40 R18
Wet Circle Wet 98% 100% −1.8 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2025 AutoBild All Season Tyre Test · 225/40 R18
Wet Handling Wet 96% 99% −3.0 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2025 AutoBild All Season Tyre Test · 225/40 R18
Snow Braking Snow 94% 93% +0.4 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2025 AutoBild All Season Tyre Test · 225/40 R18
Snow Circle Snow 95% 91% +4.1 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2025 AutoBild All Season Tyre Test · 225/40 R18
Snow Handling Snow 96% 95% +0.8 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2025 AutoBild All Season Tyre Test · 225/40 R18
Snow Traction Snow 94% 91% +3.1 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2025 AutoBild All Season Tyre Test · 225/40 R18
Noise Noise 97% 94% +2.9 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2025 AutoBild All Season Tyre Test · 225/40 R18
Abrasion Treadwear 87% 79% +8.3 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2025 AutoBild All Season Tyre Test · 225/40 R18
Wear Treadwear 85% 80% +4.6 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2025 AutoBild All Season Tyre Test · 225/40 R18
Rolling Resistance Efficiency 88% 81% +7.5 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2025 AutoBild All Season Tyre Test · 225/40 R18
Also published by the testers (not in the score)
Total Cost of Ownership Cost #7/15 #10/15 – 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2025 AutoBild All Season Tyre Test · 225/40 R18
Value Cost 81% 92% −11.7 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2025 AutoBild All Season Tyre Test · 225/40 R18
Overall Ranking Overall #5/15 #10/15 – 3–0 in 3 shared tests Newest: 2025 AutoBild All Season Tyre Test · 225/40 R18

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Kinergy 4S2

Pros

  • Exceptional wet weather grip, braking, and aquaplaning resistance
  • Strong performance and confidence in cold temperatures, light snow, and slush
  • High overall value for money compared to premium tier alternatives

Cons

  • Increased road noise and occasional highway 'whining' or howling between 120-140 km/h
  • Some reports of faster-than-expected tread wear or uneven inner tread deformation
  • Softer sidewalls can induce initial steering delay or a slight floating feel during aggressive cornering
All owner themes in the Kinergy 4S2 review

Tire B G Fit 4S

Pros

  • Excellent grip and performance in wet conditions and heavy snow
  • High value for money as an affordable budget tire with Hankook backing
  • Quiet and comfortable ride quality

Cons

  • Slightly noticeable tread noise at higher speeds above 100 km/h
  • Isolated quality control concerns regarding sidewall bumps on new tires
All owner themes in the G Fit 4S review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Hankook Kinergy 4S2

Mixed

The Hankook Kinergy 4S2 is widely regarded as a good-value 3PMSF all-weather tire, often recommended as a cheaper alternative to the Michelin CrossClimate 2 thanks to strong wet performance and good independent test results. Complaints include a stiff ride, highway road noise, fast or uneven tread wear, and weaker snow and ice grip for some owners. Several users noted that ice performance wasn't tested and that it suits milder, wet climates best.

subaruoutback.org ·3 upvotes ·2022-11-09

“I had the Kinergy 4s2 tires and they were not good. They wore unevenly, especially on the outsides of the fronts and handling was poor. When cornering the tire felt like the sidewall was folding under which would explain the increased wear on the outside tread block of the tires . The alignment was verified to be perfect. Go with the CC2 or anything Nokian . I ran some old Nokian WRG2s and was very impressed. Id imagine the latest versions are also very good.”
r/KiaNiroEV ·2 upvotes ·2026-01-20

“New Tyres - Kia dealership recommend Hankook Kinergy 4S 2 H750 215/55R17 98W Just had my 40,000 service at my local Kia dealership for my ‘22 E Niro. I am going to get my tyres changed elsewhere to save a few £££’s but am just wondering if the Hankooks are a good tyre? I am looking at around £140-160 per tyre and wondering if this is a good tyre for the price or if anyone has better suggestion for similar price or cheaper?”
r/mercedes_benz ·8 upvotes ·2026-09-06

“Tire recommendations E-class Hi all, I've been enjoying my first E-class for a couple months now. The only thing that has been bothering me is the loud noise the tires make at about 130 kph. I've ruled everything out so I'm really certain it is just the tires. They are hankook kinergy 4s2 h750 all seasons, so a bit of noise is to be expected but these really make a loud humming noise at highway speeds. Does anyone have recommendation for quiet all season tires? They do need to have the 3pmsf certifaction. My sizes are front: 245/40 R19 & back: 275/35 R19. Read more”
Top themes
#Value vs CrossClimate 2#Wet traction#Snow and ice grip#Tread wear concerns#Ride comfort stiffness#Road noise#Tyre Reviews test results#EV and range use

Based on 34 community posts

Tire B

Laufenn G Fit 4S

We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Hankook Kinergy 4S2 B · Laufenn G Fit 4S
CategoryAll SeasonAll Season
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available9579
Rim diameters14″ – 20″13″ – 20″
UTQG500 A A640 B A
Sizes in common5959

Which one should you actually buy?

Hankook Kinergy 4S2

Laufenn G Fit 4S

Winner: Laufenn G Fit 4S — better handling, comfort and treadwear. Pick the Hankook Kinergy 4S2 if noise and efficiency matter most to you.

Pick tire A You want a quieter cabin

Hankook Kinergy 4S2 scores 63 vs 38 on noise.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Laufenn G Fit 4S scores 79 vs 56 on handling.

Pick tire B You want the most comfortable ride

Laufenn G Fit 4S scores 75 vs 61 on comfort.

Pick tire B You want the longest tread life

Laufenn G Fit 4S scores 75 vs 67 on treadwear.

Tire A · Hankook Kinergy 4S2
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Laufenn G Fit 4S
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Kinergy 4S2 or G Fit 4S?

Which is better in the wet, Kinergy 4S2 or G Fit 4S?

Laufenn G Fit 4S, 85 vs 78 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Kinergy 4S2 or G Fit 4S?

Neither, by our numbers: 72 vs 72 on the dry score, within 3 points.

Which is better in snow, Kinergy 4S2 or G Fit 4S?

Laufenn G Fit 4S, 77 vs 71 on our snow score.

Which is quieter, Kinergy 4S2 or G Fit 4S?

Hankook Kinergy 4S2, 63 vs 38 on our noise score.

Which is more comfortable, Kinergy 4S2 or G Fit 4S?

Laufenn G Fit 4S, 75 vs 61 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Kinergy 4S2 or G Fit 4S?

Laufenn G Fit 4S, 75 vs 67 on our treadwear score.

Which rolls more easily, Kinergy 4S2 or G Fit 4S?

Hankook Kinergy 4S2, 51 vs 47 on our efficiency score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology