Tests – · none yet Owners – · 3 reviews (needs 5)
Head-to-head
Updated
Hankook Kinergy PT vs Laufenn S FIT AS — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 1 road tests and 3 + 16 owner reviews. How we score
Add your size for an exact match
/R
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
–
Dry
No comparison60Why this score
Source Kinergy PT S FIT AS Professional tests (TWG score) – ≈ 63 (est.) Reviews found online – 55 S FIT AS: 60% × 62.7 (est.) + 40% × 55.3 = 60
No road tests of dry for S FIT AS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
-
–
Wet
No comparison58Why this score
Source Kinergy PT S FIT AS Professional tests (TWG score) – ≈ 61 (est.) Reviews found online – 54 S FIT AS: 60% × 61.4 (est.) + 40% × 53.7 = 58
No road tests of wet for S FIT AS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
–
Snow
No comparison50Why this score
Source Kinergy PT S FIT AS Professional tests (TWG score) – ≈ 60 (est.) Reviews found online – 37 S FIT AS: 60% × 59.7 (est.) + 40% × 36.5 = 50
No road tests of snow for S FIT AS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
-
–
Comfort
No comparison61Why this score
Source Kinergy PT S FIT AS Professional tests (TWG score) – ≈ 67 (est.) Reviews found online – 58 S FIT AS: 40% × 66.5 (est.) + 60% × 57.9 = 61
No road tests of comfort for S FIT AS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.21).
-
–
Treadwear
No comparison67Why this score
Source Kinergy PT S FIT AS Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests – 75 Reviews found online – 56 S FIT AS: 60% × 74.9 + 40% × 56.3 = 67
-
–
Handling (owners)
No comparison55Why this score
Source Kinergy PT S FIT AS Reviews found online – 55
Scores at a glance
| Category | Hankook Kinergy PT | Laufenn S FIT AS |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | – | 59 |
| Dry | – | 60 |
| Wet | – | 58 |
| Snow | – | 50 |
| Comfort | – | 61 |
| Treadwear | – | 67 |
| Handling (owners) | – | 55 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
–
/ 100
Kinergy PT
59
/ 100
S FIT AS
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Kinergy PT
Pros
- Exceptional tread longevity approaching high mileage warranties
- Good dry grip performance
- Decent rolling resistance and MPG efficiency relative to tread thickness
Cons
- Extreme premature tread wear reported by some users
- Subpar wet weather performance compared to dry conditions
- Unresponsive manufacturer and retailer customer service regarding warranty issues
Tire B S FIT AS
Pros
- Exceptional value for the price compared to ultra-budget alternatives
- Very quiet and comfortable ride quality
- Good grip and handling in dry conditions
Cons
- Subpar wet-weather grip, with tendencies to lose traction easily under acceleration
- Wet performance degrades noticeably after 50% wear
- Concerns regarding rapid tread wear or limited lifespan
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Hankook Kinergy PT | B · Laufenn S FIT AS |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All Season | All Season |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| UTQG | 800 - 860 A A | 500 A A |
Which one should you actually buy?
–
/ 100
Hankook Kinergy PT
59
/ 100
Laufenn S FIT AS
Only Laufenn S FIT AS has enough test and review data for a Relative Score, so there is no head-to-head winner yet.
Tire A · Hankook Kinergy PT
Tire B · Laufenn S FIT AS
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology