Tests – · none yet Owners 76 · 32 reviews
Head-to-head
Updated
Hankook Optimo 4S vs Kumho Crugen HP71 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 32 + 277 owner reviews. How we score
Optimo 4S is ahead, 75–46
Add your size for an exact match
/R
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 34 · 277 reviews
“Tesla model y tire HP71 crugen on tirerack is offering $80 rebate per tire.”
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
74
Dry
Optimo 4S +3044Why this score
Source Optimo 4S Crugen HP71 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 72 (est.) ≈ 53 (est.) Reviews found online 77 31 Optimo 4S: 60% × 71.5 (est.) + 40% × 76.6 = 74
Crugen HP71: 60% × 52.5 (est.) + 40% × 30.5 = 44
No road tests of dry for Optimo 4S. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
No road tests of dry for Crugen HP71. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
-
79
Wet
Optimo 4S +2851Why this score
Source Optimo 4S Crugen HP71 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 77 (est.) ≈ 56 (est.) Reviews found online 82 44 Optimo 4S: 60% × 76.8 (est.) + 40% × 81.9 = 79
Crugen HP71: 60% × 56.1 (est.) + 40% × 44 = 51
No road tests of wet for Optimo 4S. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
No road tests of wet for Crugen HP71. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
–
Snow
No comparison53Why this score
Source Optimo 4S Crugen HP71 Professional tests (TWG score) – ≈ 61 (est.) Reviews found online – 41 Crugen HP71: 60% × 61.1 (est.) + 40% × 40.9 = 53
No road tests of snow for Crugen HP71. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
-
75
Comfort
Optimo 4S +3144Why this score
Source Optimo 4S Crugen HP71 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 71 (est.) ≈ 61 (est.) Reviews found online 78 32 Optimo 4S: 40% × 70.5 (est.) + 60% × 78.1 = 75
Crugen HP71: 40% × 61.4 (est.) + 60% × 31.9 = 44
No road tests of comfort for Optimo 4S or Crugen HP71. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
–
Noise
No comparison54Why this score
Source Optimo 4S Crugen HP71 Professional tests (TWG score) – ≈ 66 (est.) Reviews found online – 36 Crugen HP71: 60% × 66.3 (est.) + 40% × 35.6 = 54
No road tests of noise for Crugen HP71. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
69
Treadwear
Optimo 4S +3237Why this score
Source Optimo 4S Crugen HP71 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 68 (est.) ≈ 49 (est.) Reviews found online 70 19 Optimo 4S: 60% × 67.9 (est.) + 40% × 70.4 = 69
Crugen HP71: 60% × 49.2 (est.) + 40% × 18.5 = 37
No road tests of treadwear for Optimo 4S. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
No road tests of treadwear for Crugen HP71. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
-
75
Handling (owners)
Optimo 4S +2451Why this score
Source Optimo 4S Crugen HP71 Reviews found online 75 51
Scores at a glance
| Category | Hankook Optimo 4S | Kumho Crugen HP71 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 75 | 46 |
| Dry | 74 | 44 |
| Wet | 79 | 51 |
| Snow | – | 53 |
| Comfort | 75 | 44 |
| Noise | – | 54 |
| Treadwear | 69 | 37 |
| Handling (owners) | 75 | 51 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
75
/ 100
Optimo 4S
46
/ 100
Crugen HP71
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
The professional test results behind the scores
Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.
| Discipline | Category | Optimo 4S | Crugen HP71 | Δ | Head-to-head |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Also published by the testers (not in the score) | |||||
| Overall Ranking | Overall | #7/7 2016 ADAC All Season Tyre Test | #8/9 2021 Teknikens Värld Summer Tire Test R18 | – | Different tests |
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Optimo 4S
Pros
- Excellent traction and confidence in snow and icy conditions
- Strong performance in wet weather and standing water
- High levels of ride comfort and low road noise
Cons
- Dry road handling can feel slightly compromised compared to dedicated summer tires
- Some reports of increased noise levels when the tires are brand new
- Occasional reports of uneven tread wear or balancing issues
Tire B Crugen HP71
Pros
- Affordable pricing compared to premium tier brands
- Quiet and smooth ride quality when new
- Confident wet-weather traction and performance in heavy rain
Cons
- Significantly premature tread wear and short lifespan for many users
- Developing loud road noise or howling as mileage increases
- Balancing issues and vehicle vibrations
What real owners are saying
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Tire A
Hankook Optimo 4S
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
Tire B
Mixed
Kumho Crugen HP71
Community opinions on the Kumho Crugen HP71 (including EV variants) are generally mixed, primarily leaning on price and initial comfort versus longevity. Many users appreciate the affordable pricing, quiet/smooth ride, and good handling, but a significant number report faster-than-expected tread wear and occasional issues with foam lining separation or durability on heavier vehicles.
r/TeslaModelY
·4 upvotes ·2026-06-17
“Tesla model y tire HP71 crugen on tirerack is offering $80 rebate per tire.”
r/volvoc40
·61 upvotes ·2026-07-08
“Yet Another C40 Wheel Downsize Report I decided to join the crowd in downsizing from the factory 20" wheels to 18" Wheels: Voxx Paso Tires: Kumho Crugen EV HP71 (currently on sale for $500 for a set of 4) I was a bit worried about wheel fitment because of the large brake calipers, but they fit without issue, standard install. I've only put about 100 miles on them so far, but the ride is much more comfortable and these new tires are SO much quieter than the old tires that were installed when I bought the vehicle (CPO): Michelin Pilot Sport A/S 4 I don't have enough data yet to see if this will make a range improvement, but I imagine it will as they're skinnier tires and EV optimized. So far I'm impressed with the Kumho's, especially for the price they're offering. And I think these new wheels look pretty decent! Read more”
r/Ioniq5
·1 upvote ·2026-08-30
“The HP71 are actually the OE tire for several trim/MY combinations for the Ioniq 5 and EV6 and they're decent tires. The longest lasting tire is the Defender 2, with the trade off of mediocre traction. I run the Nokian One because it's a batter balance of traction and tread wear than the defender but still quiet and very long-lasting.”
Top themes
#Affordability and Value#Ride Comfort and Noise#Tread Wear and Longevity#EV Performance and Efficiency#Durability and Quality Issues
Based on 52 community posts
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Hankook Optimo 4S | B · Kumho Crugen HP71 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All Season | Summer Ultra High Performance tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | SUV and 4x4 |
| Sizes available | 35 | 63 |
| Rim diameters | 13″ – 17″ | 16″ – 22″ |
| Tread depth | — | 9.9/32″ |
| UTQG | 520 - 600 A A | 640 A A |
| Treadwear warranty | — | 65,000 mi |
| Sidewall | — | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | — | 51 psi |
| Sizes in common | 1 | 1 |
Which one should you actually buy?
75
/ 100
Hankook Optimo 4S
46
/ 100
Kumho Crugen HP71
Winner: Hankook Optimo 4S — better treadwear, comfort and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Pick tire A
You want the longest tread life
Hankook Optimo 4S scores 69 vs 37 on treadwear.
Pick tire A
You want the most comfortable ride
Hankook Optimo 4S scores 75 vs 44 on comfort.
Pick tire A
You want the most grip on dry roads
Hankook Optimo 4S scores 74 vs 44 on dry.
Pick tire A
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Hankook Optimo 4S scores 79 vs 51 on wet.
Tire A · Hankook Optimo 4S
Tire B · Kumho Crugen HP71
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Optimo 4S or Crugen HP71?
Which is better in the wet, Optimo 4S or Crugen HP71?
Hankook Optimo 4S, 79 vs 51 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Optimo 4S or Crugen HP71?
Hankook Optimo 4S, 74 vs 44 on our dry score.
Which is more comfortable, Optimo 4S or Crugen HP71?
Hankook Optimo 4S, 75 vs 44 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Optimo 4S or Crugen HP71?
Hankook Optimo 4S, 69 vs 37 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology