Tests – · none yet Owners 42 · 24 reviews
Hankook Optimo H426 vs Michelin Energy Saver — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): 60% professional tests, 40% owner reviews.
Energy Saver is ahead, 68–51
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 71 · 1 test Owners 66 · 137 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
53
Dry
Energy Saver +1669Why this score
Source Optimo H426 Energy Saver Professional tests (TWG score) – 71 Reviews found online 45 66 -
55
Wet
Energy Saver +1368Why this score
Source Optimo H426 Energy Saver Professional tests (TWG score) – 69 Reviews found online 50 65 -
48
Snow
No comparison–Why this score
Source Optimo H426 Energy Saver Reviews found online 33 – -
52
Comfort
Energy Saver +1668Why this score
Source Optimo H426 Energy Saver Reviews found online 34 66 -
60
Noise
Energy Saver +868Why this score
Source Optimo H426 Energy Saver Professional tests (TWG score) – 72 Reviews found online 49 62 -
50
Treadwear
Energy Saver +2171Why this score
Source Optimo H426 Energy Saver Professional tests (TWG score) – 73 Reviews found online 39 68 -
40
Handling
Energy Saver +2363Why this score
Source Optimo H426 Energy Saver Reviews found online 40 63
Scores at a glance
| Category | Hankook Optimo H426 | Michelin Energy Saver |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 51 | 68 |
| Dry | 53 | 69 |
| Wet | 55 | 68 |
| Snow | 48 | – |
| Comfort | 52 | 68 |
| Noise | 60 | 68 |
| Treadwear | 50 | 71 |
| Handling | 40 | 63 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neither tire has a score here yet, so this weight changes nothing.
Optimo H426
Energy Saver
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Optimo H426
Pros
- Reliable dry and wet traction in moderate weather
- Comfortable and smooth initial ride quality
- Confident handling and cornering capabilities
Cons
- Accelerated tread wear in the latter half of the tire's life span
- Subpar performance and loss of grip in cold temperatures or snow
- Increased road noise as the tires age
Tire B Energy Saver
Pros
- Exceptional tread life and long-lasting durability
- Noticeable improvements in fuel economy and low rolling resistance
- Low road noise and high levels of driving comfort
Cons
- Subpar wet-weather grip and traction, especially as the tires age
- Prone to dry rotting, cracking, and hardening after a few years
- Poor performance and sliding in cold or winter conditions
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Hankook Optimo H426 | B · Michelin Energy Saver |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All Season | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 11 | 4 |
| Rim diameters | 15″ – 20″ | 15″ – 16″ |
| Tread depth | 10/32″ | — |
| UTQG | 440 A A | — |
| Treadwear warranty | 60,000 mi | — |
| Sidewall | Blackwall | — |
| Max pressure | 44 psi | — |
Which one should you actually buy?
Hankook Optimo H426
Michelin Energy Saver
Winner: Michelin Energy Saver — better handling, treadwear and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Michelin Energy Saver scores 63 vs 40 on handling.
Michelin Energy Saver scores 71 vs 50 on treadwear.
Michelin Energy Saver scores 69 vs 53 on dry.
Michelin Energy Saver scores 68 vs 52 on comfort.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.