Head-to-head Updated

Hankook Optimo H426 vs Michelin Energy Saver — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): 60% professional tests, 40% owner reviews.

Energy Saver is ahead, 68–51

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 53

    Dry

    Energy Saver +16
    69
    Why this score
    SourceOptimo H426Energy Saver
    Professional tests (TWG score)–71
    Reviews found online4566
  2. 55

    Wet

    Energy Saver +13
    68
    Why this score
    SourceOptimo H426Energy Saver
    Professional tests (TWG score)–69
    Reviews found online5065
  3. 48

    Snow

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceOptimo H426Energy Saver
    Reviews found online33–
  4. 52

    Comfort

    Energy Saver +16
    68
    Why this score
    SourceOptimo H426Energy Saver
    Reviews found online3466
  5. 60

    Noise

    Energy Saver +8
    68
    Why this score
    SourceOptimo H426Energy Saver
    Professional tests (TWG score)–72
    Reviews found online4962
  6. 50

    Treadwear

    Energy Saver +21
    71
    Why this score
    SourceOptimo H426Energy Saver
    Professional tests (TWG score)–73
    Reviews found online3968
  7. 40

    Handling

    Energy Saver +23
    63
    Why this score
    SourceOptimo H426Energy Saver
    Reviews found online4063
Scores at a glance
Hankook Optimo H426 vs Michelin Energy Saver: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryHankook Optimo H426Michelin Energy Saver
Relative Score 51 68
Dry 53 69
Wet 55 68
Snow 48 –
Comfort 52 68
Noise 60 68
Treadwear 50 71
Handling 40 63

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost

Neither tire has a score here yet, so this weight changes nothing.

Less important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Less important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Optimo H426

Energy Saver

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Optimo H426

Pros

  • Reliable dry and wet traction in moderate weather
  • Comfortable and smooth initial ride quality
  • Confident handling and cornering capabilities

Cons

  • Accelerated tread wear in the latter half of the tire's life span
  • Subpar performance and loss of grip in cold temperatures or snow
  • Increased road noise as the tires age
All owner themes in the Optimo H426 review

Tire B Energy Saver

Pros

  • Exceptional tread life and long-lasting durability
  • Noticeable improvements in fuel economy and low rolling resistance
  • Low road noise and high levels of driving comfort

Cons

  • Subpar wet-weather grip and traction, especially as the tires age
  • Prone to dry rotting, cracking, and hardening after a few years
  • Poor performance and sliding in cold or winter conditions
All owner themes in the Energy Saver review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Hankook Optimo H426 B · Michelin Energy Saver
CategoryAll SeasonSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available114
Rim diameters15″ – 20″15″ – 16″
Tread depth10/32″—
UTQG440 A A—
Treadwear warranty60,000 mi—
SidewallBlackwall—
Max pressure44 psi—

Which one should you actually buy?

Hankook Optimo H426

Michelin Energy Saver

Winner: Michelin Energy Saver — better handling, treadwear and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Michelin Energy Saver scores 63 vs 40 on handling.

Pick tire B You want the longest tread life

Michelin Energy Saver scores 71 vs 50 on treadwear.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Michelin Energy Saver scores 69 vs 53 on dry.

Pick tire B You want the most comfortable ride

Michelin Energy Saver scores 68 vs 52 on comfort.

Tire A · Hankook Optimo H426
Tire B · Michelin Energy Saver

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.

68

Leads

Energy Saver

Amazon