tirewheelguide

Hankook Optimo H725 looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.

Head-to-head Updated

Hankook Optimo H725 vs Kumho Crugen HP71 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 36 + 275 owner reviews. How we score

Optimo H725 leads, 55–52 Narrow edge

Check price on Amazon · Optimo H725 or Crugen HP71 on Amazon
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Hankook Optimo H725
Tire AHankook

Optimo H725

All-Season tire

Tests – · none yet Owners 48 · 36 reviews

Kumho Crugen HP71
Tire BKumho

Crugen HP71

Summer Ultra High Performance tires

Tests – · none yet Owners 41 · 275 reviews

“Tesla model y tire HP71 crugen on tirerack is offering $80 rebate per tire.”

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 53

    Dry

    Optimo H725 +5
    48
    Why this score
    SourceOptimo H725Crugen HP71
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 58 (est.)≈ 55 (est.)
    Reviews found online4537

    Optimo H725: 60% × 58.4 (est.) + 40% × 44.5 = 53

    Crugen HP71: 60% × 55.2 (est.) + 40% × 36.6 = 48

    No road tests of dry for Optimo H725. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

    No road tests of dry for Crugen HP71. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

  2. 57

    Wet

    Optimo H725 +2
    55
    Why this score
    SourceOptimo H725Crugen HP71
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 60 (est.)≈ 58 (est.)
    Reviews found online5249

    Optimo H725: 60% × 59.9 (est.) + 40% × 52.1 = 57

    Crugen HP71: 60% × 58.2 (est.) + 40% × 49.1 = 55

    No road tests of wet for Optimo H725. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

    No road tests of wet for Crugen HP71. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

  3. 55

    Snow

    Crugen HP71 +2
    57
    Why this score
    SourceOptimo H725Crugen HP71
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 62 (est.)≈ 63 (est.)
    Reviews found online4648

    Optimo H725: 60% × 61.8 (est.) + 40% × 45.5 = 55

    Crugen HP71: 60% × 62.5 (est.) + 40% × 47.6 = 57

    No road tests of snow for Optimo H725. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).

    No road tests of snow for Crugen HP71. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).

  4. 54

    Comfort

    Level
    54
    Why this score
    SourceOptimo H725Crugen HP71
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 64 (est.)≈ 64 (est.)
    Reviews found online4040

    Optimo H725: 60% × 64.1 (est.) + 40% × 39.8 = 54

    Crugen HP71: 60% × 64 (est.) + 40% × 39.6 = 54

    No road tests of comfort for Optimo H725 or Crugen HP71. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 61

    Noise

    Optimo H725 +3
    58
    Why this score
    SourceOptimo H725Crugen HP71
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online5244

    Optimo H725: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 52.3 = 61

    Crugen HP71: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 43.7 = 58

    No road tests of noise for Optimo H725 or Crugen HP71. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 56

    Treadwear

    Optimo H725 +12
    44
    Why this score
    SourceOptimo H725Crugen HP71
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 60 (est.)≈ 54 (est.)
    Reviews found online4929

    Optimo H725: 60% × 60.4 (est.) + 40% × 48.8 = 56

    Crugen HP71: 60% × 54.4 (est.) + 40% × 29.1 = 44

    No road tests of treadwear for Optimo H725. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

    No road tests of treadwear for Crugen HP71. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

  7. 46

    Handling (owners)

    Crugen HP71 +9
    55
    Why this score
    SourceOptimo H725Crugen HP71
    Reviews found online4655
Scores at a glance
CategoryHankook Optimo H725Kumho Crugen HP71
Relative Score 55 52
Dry 53 48
Wet 57 55
Snow 55 57
Comfort 54 54
Noise 61 58
Treadwear 56 44
Handling (owners) 46 55

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Optimo H725

Crugen HP71

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Optimo H725

Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.

Tire B Crugen HP71

Pros

  • Affordable pricing compared to premium tier brands
  • Quiet and smooth ride quality when new
  • Confident wet-weather traction and performance in heavy rain

Cons

  • Significantly premature tread wear and short lifespan for many users
  • Developing loud road noise or howling as mileage increases
  • Balancing issues and vehicle vibrations
All owner themes in the Crugen HP71 review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Hankook Optimo H725

We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.

Tire B

Kumho Crugen HP71

Mixed

Community sentiment for the Kumho Crugen HP71 (and its EV variant) is mixed, with owners praising its affordability, comfortable ride, and quiet performance on many vehicles. However, a significant number of drivers report disappointingly rapid tread wear—particularly on heavy electric vehicles—as well as occasional noise on coarse surfaces and internal acoustic foam detachment issues.

bobistheoilguy.com ·2023-03-02

“Bought a set of Kumho tires to replace the OE Michelins on the wife's Ford Edge. The Michelins have barely 35K and aren't going to pass the NC safety check. For being a top tier tire they were wildly mediocre. I've has several sets of Kumho and they are better than average and not too expensive. I bought four of these. Anybody have experience with Kumhos? Kumho​ Crugen HP71​ 245 /60 R18 105V SL BSW​”
r/VWiD4Owners ·3 upvotes ·2026-02-14

“2023 ID4 AWD Pro S Kumho Crugen EV HP71 I replaced the original worn down (and one with a sidewall bump) Pirellis at 33k with the EV version (badges on the sidewall) of the HP71 (direct from dealer). They're more expensive than the non-EV versions and have a lower warranty. So far they're impressive: ride is softer/smoother, quieter, deep treads. Hard to tell if efficiency changed with the winter weather, but we were getting 3mi/kWh on a 34 degree day.”
teslamotorsclub.com ·2 upvotes ·2026-02-12

“That is a crazy good price - The TA91 is low $200s wholesale! (Tire shop pricing). And $279.30 retail. (Tire Rack) Grab them while you can. Sometimes Wal Mart beats any price I can get when they're blowing out a specific tire. FWIW we run the Kumho HP71 EV (OE tire) on our EV9 and it's a super quiet tire. I bought it again for the Spring now that the car is actually aligned and won't burn through them.”
Top themes
#Rapid tread wear#Affordable price value#Cabin noise levels#Ride comfort#EV tire performance#Acoustic foam issues#OEM tire replacement

Based on 51 community posts

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Hankook Optimo H725 B · Kumho Crugen HP71
CategoryAll-Season tireSummer Ultra High Performance tires
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverSUV and 4x4
Sizes available—63
Rim diameters—16″ – 22″
Tread depth9/32″9.9/32″
UTQG700 A B640 A A
Treadwear warranty—65,000 mi
SidewallBlackwallBlackwall
Max pressure51 psi51 psi

Which one should you actually buy?

Hankook Optimo H725

Kumho Crugen HP71

Narrow edge: Hankook Optimo H725 — better treadwear, dry and noise. Pick the Kumho Crugen HP71 if handling matters most to you.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

Hankook Optimo H725 scores 56 vs 44 on treadwear.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Kumho Crugen HP71 scores 55 vs 46 on handling.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

Hankook Optimo H725 scores 53 vs 48 on dry.

Pick tire A You want a quieter cabin

Hankook Optimo H725 scores 61 vs 58 on noise.

Tire A · Hankook Optimo H725
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Kumho Crugen HP71
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Optimo H725 or Crugen HP71?

Which is better in the wet, Optimo H725 or Crugen HP71?

Neither, by our numbers: 57 vs 55 on the wet score, within 3 points.

Which grips better on dry roads, Optimo H725 or Crugen HP71?

Hankook Optimo H725, 53 vs 48 on our dry score.

Which is better in snow, Optimo H725 or Crugen HP71?

Neither, by our numbers: 55 vs 57 on the snow score, within 3 points.

Which is quieter, Optimo H725 or Crugen HP71?

Hankook Optimo H725, 61 vs 58 on our noise score.

Which is more comfortable, Optimo H725 or Crugen HP71?

Neither, by our numbers: 54 vs 54 on the comfort score, within 3 points.

Which lasts longer, Optimo H725 or Crugen HP71?

Hankook Optimo H725, 56 vs 44 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology