Tests – · none yet Owners 48 · 36 reviews
Hankook Optimo H725 looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.
Hankook Optimo H725 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 4 road tests and 36 + 2,560 owner reviews. How we score
CrossClimate 2 SUV is ahead, 81–55
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 86 · 4 tests Owners 78 · 2,560 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 10 in 2023 SUV All Season Tyre Test (dry braking)
“I also live in Michigan and we get plenty of all four seasons. I put CC2s on my 2017 RAV4 Hybrid. They have handled all weather conditions up to and including moderate snow with aplomb. If I had to buy new tires tomorrow, I'd get another set.”
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
53
Dry
CrossClimate 2 SUV +3184Why this score
Source Optimo H725 CrossClimate 2 SUV Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 4 tests ≈ 58 (est.) 85 Reviews found online 45 83 Optimo H725: 60% × 58.4 (est.) + 40% × 44.5 = 53
CrossClimate 2 SUV: 60% × 85.3 + 40% × 82.5 = 84
No road tests of dry for Optimo H725. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
-
57
Wet
CrossClimate 2 SUV +2582Why this score
Source Optimo H725 CrossClimate 2 SUV Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 4 tests ≈ 60 (est.) 83 Reviews found online 52 81 Optimo H725: 60% × 59.9 (est.) + 40% × 52.1 = 57
CrossClimate 2 SUV: 60% × 83 + 40% × 80.9 = 82
No road tests of wet for Optimo H725. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
-
55
Snow
CrossClimate 2 SUV +3388Why this score
Source Optimo H725 CrossClimate 2 SUV Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 4 tests ≈ 62 (est.) 96 Reviews found online 46 77 Optimo H725: 60% × 61.8 (est.) + 40% × 45.5 = 55
CrossClimate 2 SUV: 60% × 96.3 + 40% × 76.5 = 88
No road tests of snow for Optimo H725. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).
-
54
Comfort
CrossClimate 2 SUV +2983Why this score
Source Optimo H725 CrossClimate 2 SUV Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 2 tests ≈ 64 (est.) 82 Reviews found online 40 83 Optimo H725: 60% × 64.1 (est.) + 40% × 39.8 = 54
CrossClimate 2 SUV: 60% × 82.1 + 40% × 83.4 = 83
No road tests of comfort for Optimo H725. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
61
Noise
CrossClimate 2 SUV +1677Why this score
Source Optimo H725 CrossClimate 2 SUV Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 4 tests ≈ 67 (est.) 83 Reviews found online 52 ≈ 67 (est.) Optimo H725: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 52.3 = 61
CrossClimate 2 SUV: 60% × 82.8 + 40% × 67.3 (est.) = 77
No road tests of noise for Optimo H725. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
No owner ratings of noise for CrossClimate 2 SUV. The owner half is the owners’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.
-
56
Treadwear
CrossClimate 2 SUV +1167Why this score
Source Optimo H725 CrossClimate 2 SUV Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 60 (est.) ≈ 67 (est.) Reviews found online 49 69 Optimo H725: 60% × 60.4 (est.) + 40% × 48.8 = 56
CrossClimate 2 SUV: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 68.8 = 67
No road tests of treadwear for Optimo H725. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
No road tests of treadwear for CrossClimate 2 SUV. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
-
46
Handling (owners)
CrossClimate 2 SUV +3682Why this score
Source Optimo H725 CrossClimate 2 SUV Reviews found online 46 82
Scores at a glance
| Category | Hankook Optimo H725 | Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 55 | 81 |
| Dry | 53 | 84 |
| Wet | 57 | 82 |
| Snow | 55 | 88 |
| Comfort | 54 | 83 |
| Noise | 61 | 77 |
| Treadwear | 56 | 67 |
| Handling (owners) | 46 | 82 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Optimo H725
CrossClimate 2 SUV
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Optimo H725
Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.
Tire B CrossClimate 2 SUV
Pros
- Exceptional wet, ice, and snow traction that inspires winter-weather driving confidence
- Significantly improved ride comfort and impact absorption over road imperfections
- Impressive tread life and durability yielding long-term value
Cons
- Higher initial purchase price compared to competitors
- Minor fuel economy or range drop reported by some users, especially on hybrids and EVs
- Occasional low-pitched or increased road noise at highway speeds (between 50-70 MPH)
What real owners are saying
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Hankook Optimo H725
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
Community sentiment for the Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV is largely positive, with drivers consistently praising its exceptional grip and safety in snow, slush, and heavy rain. The primary trade-offs frequently cited are reduced fuel/range efficiency—particularly noted by EV owners—along with a premium price tag, directional rotation limitations, and mixed opinions on road noise.
“Quote: Originally Posted by Gitzer I think the advice on this thread is exactly right. In fact, don’t drive your new car if there is any snow or ice on the road. Get the CC2s or equivalent immediately. You are going to need them next winter anyway. Lots of people are recommending, the CCs but aren’t they all-seasons? It seems like if I’m already stuck owning Summer tires, I’m better off buying an winter set and alternating, vs owning a Summer a All Season, no? What’s killing me is no one has or can order winter tires this late in the season. it’s really frustrating that the brand new luxury car doesn’t come with all seasons, or some tires that are even safe to opperate where the vehicle was sold. Im literally going to have to rent a a car on cold days to keep my family safe ☹️”
“You got that right! Between my local tire shop and many on here claiming the CC2s was the greatest thing since the forward pass I took the plunge. Last week I took the manager for a ride at the tire shop and he said that’s the complaints he hears about them. He still thinks the noise is worth the trade off in the snow, even though we get next to none here anymore. They’ve been balanced on a hunter and road forced yet still vibrate at 80. When I swap out the CC2s for my lx 25s there’s no vibration whatsoever and next to no sound. The lx25s are one of the ugliest tires I’ve ever seen or I’d just run with them. My goal is to use the lx25s as a winter tire and get pro contacts to replace the Michelins, but, I can’t get the Michelins to wear out. Which is obviously a good thing considering they cost a grand. They went to 7-8/32nds and stalled like a brisket. Meanwhile at almost 2 yrs old they’re getting harder as everyday passes. Worst “premium” tire I’ve ever purchased!”
“Look at all weather tires (3PMSF rated) instead of a basic all season. Michelin CrossClimate2 is hard to beat for safety and snow grip and they’re not that loud in my experience. I put them on my wife’s Highlander and they’ve been smooth and confident in slush and highway rain. If you want something a little quieter and softer riding, Bridgestone WeatherPeak or Pirelli Scorpion WeatherActive are also solid. When I priced 245/50R20 CC2s recently, Costco was around $314 per tire installed $1,256 set before tax during a promo, Tire Rack was about $302 per tire $1,208 before install and Discounted Wheel Warehouse had them closer to $279 per tire $1,116 before install so roughly $140 difference on a set before mounting”
Based on 97 community posts
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Hankook Optimo H725 | B · Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All-Season tire | All Season |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | SUV and 4x4 |
| Sizes available | — | 35 |
| Rim diameters | — | 17″ – 22″ |
| Tread depth | 9/32″ | — |
| UTQG | 700 A B | — |
| Sidewall | Blackwall | — |
| Max pressure | 51 psi | — |
Which one should you actually buy?
Hankook Optimo H725
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
Winner: Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV — better handling, snow and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV scores 82 vs 46 on handling.
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV scores 88 vs 55 on snow.
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV scores 84 vs 53 on dry.
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV scores 83 vs 54 on comfort.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Optimo H725 or CrossClimate 2 SUV?
Which is better in the wet, Optimo H725 or CrossClimate 2 SUV?
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV, 82 vs 57 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Optimo H725 or CrossClimate 2 SUV?
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV, 84 vs 53 on our dry score.
Which is better in snow, Optimo H725 or CrossClimate 2 SUV?
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV, 88 vs 55 on our snow score.
Which is quieter, Optimo H725 or CrossClimate 2 SUV?
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV, 77 vs 61 on our noise score.
Which is more comfortable, Optimo H725 or CrossClimate 2 SUV?
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV, 83 vs 54 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Optimo H725 or CrossClimate 2 SUV?
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV, 67 vs 56 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology