tirewheelguide
Head-to-head Updated

Hankook Ventus Prime 3 K125 vs Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 14 + 4 road tests and 124 + 2,192 owner reviews. How we score

Ventus Prime 3 K125 is ahead, 76–70

Check price on Amazon · Ventus Prime 3 K125 or ADVAN Fleva V701 on Amazon
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Hankook Ventus Prime 3 K125
Tire AHankook

Ventus Prime 3 K125

Summer

± 6

Tests 77 · 14 tests Owners 75 · 124 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 53 in 2021 53 Summer Tyre Braking Test (dry braking)

Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701
Tire BYokohama

ADVAN Fleva V701

Summer

± 5

Tests 73 · 4 tests Owners 57 · 2,192 reviews

Best test result: #2 of 22 in 2022 Consumer Reports Ultra High Performance Summer Tires (tested tread life (miles))

“I just got the Yokohama Advan Fleva V701's and I like them a lot. The turn in is quicker and the feel is better than the Indy 500's that I had before. They feel more solid and less vague.The sidewall seems a bit stiffer, but somehow the ride is not as harsh.”

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 85

    Dry

    Ventus Prime 3 K125 +11
    74
    Why this score
    SourceVentus Prime 3 K125ADVAN Fleva V701
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 12 / 3 tests8978
    Reviews found online7967
    Dry Braking (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 1–099%98%
    Dry Handling (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 1–099%99%

    Ventus Prime 3 K125: 60% × 88.5 + 40% × 79.3 = 85

    ADVAN Fleva V701: 60% × 77.7 + 40% × 67.3 = 74

  2. 80

    Wet

    Ventus Prime 3 K125 +12
    68
    Why this score
    SourceVentus Prime 3 K125ADVAN Fleva V701
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 12 / 3 tests8270
    Reviews found online7764
    Wet Braking (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 1–097%86%
    Wet Handling (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 1–099%97%

    Ventus Prime 3 K125: 60% × 81.8 + 40% × 77.2 = 80

    ADVAN Fleva V701: 60% × 70 + 40% × 64 = 68

  3. –

    Snow

    No comparison
    34
    Why this score
    SourceVentus Prime 3 K125ADVAN Fleva V701
    Professional tests (TWG score)–≈ 49 (est.)
    Reviews found online–13

    ADVAN Fleva V701: 60% × 49 (est.) + 40% × 12.7 = 34

    No road tests of snow for ADVAN Fleva V701. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).

  4. 74

    Comfort

    Ventus Prime 3 K125 +12
    62
    Why this score
    SourceVentus Prime 3 K125ADVAN Fleva V701
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 3 / 1 tests7662
    Reviews found online7262

    Ventus Prime 3 K125: 40% × 75.9 + 60% × 72.4 = 74

    ADVAN Fleva V701: 40% × 62.5 + 60% × 61.5 = 62

  5. 75

    Noise

    Ventus Prime 3 K125 +6
    69
    Why this score
    SourceVentus Prime 3 K125ADVAN Fleva V701
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 6 / 1 tests8075
    Reviews found online≈ 67 (est.)60

    Ventus Prime 3 K125: 60% × 80.3 + 40% × 66.6 (est.) = 75

    ADVAN Fleva V701: 60% × 74.8 + 40% × 60 = 69

    No owner ratings of noise for Ventus Prime 3 K125. The owner half is the owners’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.

  6. 65

    Treadwear

    ADVAN Fleva V701 +4
    69
    Why this score
    SourceVentus Prime 3 K125ADVAN Fleva V701
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 5 / 3 tests6175
    Reviews found online7159
    Wear (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 1–072%71%

    Ventus Prime 3 K125: 60% × 61 + 40% × 70.5 = 65

    ADVAN Fleva V701: 60% × 75.3 + 40% × 59.3 = 69

  7. 75

    Handling (owners)

    Ventus Prime 3 K125 +3
    72
    Why this score
    SourceVentus Prime 3 K125ADVAN Fleva V701
    Reviews found online7572
  8. 66

    Efficiency

    ADVAN Fleva V701 +5
    71
    Why this score
    SourceVentus Prime 3 K125ADVAN Fleva V701
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 8 / 1 tests6671
Scores at a glance
CategoryHankook Ventus Prime 3 K125Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701
Relative Score 76 70
Dry 85 74
Wet 80 68
Snow – 34
Comfort 74 62
Noise 75 69
Treadwear 65 69
Handling (owners) 75 72
Efficiency 66 71

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 6

Ventus Prime 3 K125

± 5

ADVAN Fleva V701

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

The professional test results behind the scores

Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.

In the overall rankings of 3 tests that ran both, Hankook Ventus Prime 3 K125 finished ahead 3 times and Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 0 times.

DisciplineCategoryVentus Prime 3 K125ADVAN Fleva V701ΔHead-to-head
Dry Braking Dry 99% 98% +1.7 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2017 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test · 225/50 R17
Dry Handling Dry 99% 99% +0.1 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2017 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test · 225/50 R17
Wet Braking Wet 97% 86% +10.8 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2017 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test · 225/50 R17
Wet Handling Wet 99% 97% +1.9 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2017 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test · 225/50 R17
Wear Treadwear 72% 71% +0.8 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2017 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test · 225/50 R17
Also published by the testers (not in the score)
Overall Ranking Overall #3/11 #9/11 – 3–0 in 3 shared tests Newest: 2018 Auto Review 225/45 R17 Tyre Test · 225/45 R17

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Ventus Prime 3 K125

Pros

  • Excellent dry road grip and braking performance
  • High value-for-money ratio compared to premium competitors
  • Comfortable ride quality with effective vibration absorption

Cons

  • Increased risk of hydroplaning as tread depth decreases
  • Accelerated tread wear on heavier vehicles or under high-torque conditions
  • Noise levels can increase noticeably after several thousand miles
All owner themes in the Ventus Prime 3 K125 review

Tire B ADVAN Fleva V701

Pros

  • Exceptional dry and wet grip for the price point
  • Noticeably quieter and more comfortable than many competing UHP tires
  • Precise steering response and good road feedback

Cons

  • Faster-than-average tread wear reported by aggressive drivers
  • Some complaints regarding soft sidewalls leading to initial turn-in delay or tramlining
  • Occasional reports of elevated road noise depending on the vehicle and road surface
All owner themes in the ADVAN Fleva V701 review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Hankook Ventus Prime 3 K125

We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.

Tire B

Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701

Positive

The community generally views the Yokohama Advan Fleva V701 as a strong, high-value summer tire ideal for daily driving, spirited backroad runs, and wet weather conditions. Drivers praise its sharp turn-in, stiff sidewalls, and dependable grip compared to other budget or mid-tier alternatives, though some debate its lifespan and how it stacks up against premium options like Michelin.

alltrac.net ·2025-04-09

“Online reviews in general are such a crapshoot. So many times you see products with diametrically opposed opinions. It's tough to sift through to figure out what may be true for your own application/situation. I'm sure part of the reason less people buy the Vredestein is brand recognition. Like underscore...I would say I've never heard of them...other than that I have seen their brand as I've been looking for tires to go on my 15" OZ rally wheels. They had a tire in an uncommon 215-50-15. Since you have first hand experience that is positive, that's probably worth more than 99% of online reviews. I'll probably go with Yokohama Advan Fleva v701 in 205-55-15 eventually. I've seen glowing reviews for them and reviews that say they are garbage. I'd like to get Yokohama Advan HF Type-D for their period correctness, and because I just think they look cool ( and isn't that what's most important in a tire? ) ...but they are difficult to get in the States. Well, maybe not difficult, just costly. When I looked on Nengun, it was about $650 for shipping on a set of 4. Most UK & European suppliers I've found won't even ship them to the US. But I'm getting way off topic here.”
fiestastforum.com ·2022-11-30

“I just got the Yokohama Advan Fleva V701's and I like them a lot. The turn in is quicker and the feel is better than the Indy 500's that I had before. They feel more solid and less vague.The sidewall seems a bit stiffer, but somehow the ride is not as harsh.”
r/Civic_Type_R ·3 upvotes ·2026-09-05

“Suggestiona on tyres Hi everyone, Just wanted to ask if you guys ever had Yokohama Advan Fleva V701. My FK2 has nearly 400bhp and I’m not using it daily anymore as I want it to preserve the baby. My drive is a bit aggressive occasionally but nothing crazy or track day as I don’t have the time. I would like to know if you guys ever had this specific type of tyre. What you think about? They’re actually good? I wouldn’t like to buy again the Michelin pilot sport 4s which I found absolutely rubbish. I found those yoko for the decent price of 98£ each. So I buy it or should I move to Pirelli PZero pZ4 sport ?”
Top themes
#Daily driving comfort#Wet and dry grip#Spirited backroad handling#Value for money#Tire wear and lifespan#Sidewall stiffness

Based on 22 community posts

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Hankook Ventus Prime 3 K125 B · Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701
CategorySummerSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available6070
Rim diameters15″ – 20″15″ – 20″
Tread depth—9/32″
UTQG—300 A A
Sidewall—Blackwall
Max pressure—51 psi
Sizes in common3636

Which one should you actually buy?

Hankook Ventus Prime 3 K125

Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701

Winner: Hankook Ventus Prime 3 K125 — better wet, comfort and dry. Pick the Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 if efficiency and treadwear matter most to you.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Hankook Ventus Prime 3 K125 scores 80 vs 68 on wet.

Pick tire A You want the most comfortable ride

Hankook Ventus Prime 3 K125 scores 74 vs 62 on comfort.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

Hankook Ventus Prime 3 K125 scores 85 vs 74 on dry.

Pick tire A You want a quieter cabin

Hankook Ventus Prime 3 K125 scores 75 vs 69 on noise.

Tire A · Hankook Ventus Prime 3 K125
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Ventus Prime 3 K125 or ADVAN Fleva V701?

Which is better in the wet, Ventus Prime 3 K125 or ADVAN Fleva V701?

Hankook Ventus Prime 3 K125, 80 vs 68 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Ventus Prime 3 K125 or ADVAN Fleva V701?

Hankook Ventus Prime 3 K125, 85 vs 74 on our dry score.

Which is quieter, Ventus Prime 3 K125 or ADVAN Fleva V701?

Hankook Ventus Prime 3 K125, 75 vs 69 on our noise score.

Which is more comfortable, Ventus Prime 3 K125 or ADVAN Fleva V701?

Hankook Ventus Prime 3 K125, 74 vs 62 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Ventus Prime 3 K125 or ADVAN Fleva V701?

Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701, 69 vs 65 on our treadwear score.

Which rolls more easily, Ventus Prime 3 K125 or ADVAN Fleva V701?

Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701, 71 vs 66 on our efficiency score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology