Tests 69 · 1 test Owners 73 · 211 reviews
“I had the DW's on my Porsche 911 last year and really liked them. I liked them so much, I just installed a set on my C6 base. I waiting for the 3' of snow to melt before I try them out.”
Vredestein Ultrac Cento looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 1 + 0 road tests and 211 + 23 owner reviews. How we score
Too close to call: Ventus R-S4 and Ultrac Cento are level at 71.
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 69 · 1 test Owners 73 · 211 reviews
“I had the DW's on my Porsche 911 last year and really liked them. I liked them so much, I just installed a set on my C6 base. I waiting for the 3' of snow to melt before I try them out.”
Tests – · none yet Owners 73 · 23 reviews
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
| Source | Ventus R-S4 | Ultrac Cento |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests | 69 | ≈ 69 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 80 | 71 |
Ventus R-S4: 60% × 68.6 + 40% × 79.7 = 73
Ultrac Cento: 60% × 69 (est.) + 40% × 70.5 = 70
No road tests of dry for Ultrac Cento. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
| Source | Ventus R-S4 | Ultrac Cento |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | ≈ 68 (est.) | ≈ 72 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 65 | 74 |
Ventus R-S4: 60% × 67.8 (est.) + 40% × 65.4 = 67
Ultrac Cento: 60% × 72.4 (est.) + 40% × 73.8 = 73
No road tests of wet for Ventus R-S4. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
No road tests of wet for Ultrac Cento. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
| Source | Ventus R-S4 | Ultrac Cento |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | ≈ 66 (est.) | ≈ 69 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 54 | 71 |
Ventus R-S4: 40% × 65.8 (est.) + 60% × 54.1 = 59
Ultrac Cento: 40% × 69.2 (est.) + 60% × 70.9 = 70
No road tests of comfort for Ventus R-S4. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
No road tests of comfort for Ultrac Cento. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
| Source | Ventus R-S4 | Ultrac Cento |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | ≈ 71 (est.) | ≈ 70 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 78 | 76 |
Ventus R-S4: 60% × 70.6 (est.) + 40% × 77.9 = 74
Ultrac Cento: 60% × 69.8 (est.) + 40% × 75.5 = 72
No road tests of treadwear for Ventus R-S4. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
No road tests of treadwear for Ultrac Cento. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
| Source | Ventus R-S4 | Ultrac Cento |
|---|---|---|
| Reviews found online | 81 | 69 |
| Category | Hankook Ventus R-S4 | Vredestein Ultrac Cento |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 71 | 71 |
| Dry | 73 | 70 |
| Wet | 67 | 73 |
| Comfort | 59 | 70 |
| Treadwear | 74 | 72 |
| Handling (owners) | 81 | 69 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Ventus R-S4
Ultrac Cento
Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.
| Discipline | Category | Ventus R-S4 | Ultrac Cento | Δ | Head-to-head |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Also published by the testers (not in the score) | |||||
| Overall Ranking | Overall | #7/11 2022 Tire Rack Extreme Performance Track Tyre Test | #27/49 2014 Auto Bild 50 Summer Tyre Shootout | – | Different tests |
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
The community holds a very positive view of the Hankook Ventus R-S4, praising its exceptional grip, excellent treadwear, and durability on the track. Users also note that it provides a surprisingly smooth and quiet ride for street use, though some mention it requires heat cycling management as it ages.
“I had the DW's on my Porsche 911 last year and really liked them. I liked them so much, I just installed a set on my C6 base. I waiting for the 3' of snow to melt before I try them out.”
“Quote: Originally Posted by LbulletM Came back to say this. I bought the HanKooks and LOVE THEM!! Good wear but most of all Super Quiet. To each their own, not trying to start a war...just giving personal experience with the product....I dont drive in a matter to need High performance so I cant speak to cornering or load or any of the other gearhead tire talk....Smooth and Quiet!”
Based on 10 community posts
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
| Attribute | A · Hankook Ventus R-S4 | B · Vredestein Ultrac Cento |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| UTQG | 200 AA A | — |
Hankook Ventus R-S4
Vredestein Ultrac Cento
Too close to call: Hankook Ventus R-S4 and Vredestein Ultrac Cento are within 2 points overall. Hankook Ventus R-S4 is stronger on handling and dry. Vredestein Ultrac Cento is stronger on comfort and wet.
Hankook Ventus R-S4 scores 81 vs 69 on handling.
Vredestein Ultrac Cento scores 70 vs 59 on comfort.
Vredestein Ultrac Cento scores 73 vs 67 on wet.
Hankook Ventus R-S4 scores 73 vs 70 on dry.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Vredestein Ultrac Cento, 73 vs 67 on our wet score.
Hankook Ventus R-S4, 73 vs 70 on our dry score.
Vredestein Ultrac Cento, 70 vs 59 on our comfort score.
Neither, by our numbers: 74 vs 72 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology