Tests – · none yet Owners 73 · 211 reviews
“I had the DW's on my Porsche 911 last year and really liked them. I liked them so much, I just installed a set on my C6 base. I waiting for the 3' of snow to melt before I try them out.”
Yokohama Advan S4 looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 211 + 3 owner reviews. How we score
Ventus R-S4 is ahead, 71–51
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 73 · 211 reviews
“I had the DW's on my Porsche 911 last year and really liked them. I liked them so much, I just installed a set on my C6 base. I waiting for the 3' of snow to melt before I try them out.”
Tests – · none yet Owners 46 · 3 reviews
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
| Source | Ventus R-S4 | Advan S4 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | ≈ 72 (est.) | ≈ 58 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 79 | 43 |
Ventus R-S4: 60% × 72.4 (est.) + 40% × 79.4 = 75
Advan S4: 60% × 57.6 (est.) + 40% × 42.6 = 52
No road tests of dry for Ventus R-S4. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
No road tests of dry for Advan S4. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
| Source | Ventus R-S4 | Advan S4 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | ≈ 68 (est.) | ≈ 50 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 66 | 35 |
Ventus R-S4: 60% × 67.8 (est.) + 40% × 66.2 = 67
Advan S4: 60% × 50.2 (est.) + 40% × 34.8 = 44
No road tests of wet for Ventus R-S4. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
No road tests of wet for Advan S4. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
| Source | Ventus R-S4 | Advan S4 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | ≈ 68 (est.) | ≈ 64 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 60 | 40 |
Ventus R-S4: 60% × 67.6 (est.) + 40% × 60 = 65
Advan S4: 60% × 64.1 (est.) + 40% × 40 = 54
No road tests of comfort for Ventus R-S4 or Advan S4. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
| Source | Ventus R-S4 | Advan S4 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | ≈ 67 (est.) | – |
| Reviews found online | 71 | – |
Ventus R-S4: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 70.9 = 69
No road tests of noise for Ventus R-S4. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
| Source | Ventus R-S4 | Advan S4 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | ≈ 68 (est.) | ≈ 65 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 74 | 62 |
Ventus R-S4: 60% × 68.3 (est.) + 40% × 74.2 = 71
Advan S4: 60% × 64.6 (est.) + 40% × 62.3 = 64
No road tests of treadwear for Ventus R-S4. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
No road tests of treadwear for Advan S4. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
| Source | Ventus R-S4 | Advan S4 |
|---|---|---|
| Reviews found online | 80 | 47 |
| Category | Hankook Ventus R-S4 | Yokohama Advan S4 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 71 | 51 |
| Dry | 75 | 52 |
| Wet | 67 | 44 |
| Comfort | 65 | 54 |
| Noise | 69 | – |
| Treadwear | 71 | 64 |
| Handling (owners) | 80 | 47 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Ventus R-S4
Advan S4
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Community sentiment regarding the Hankook Ventus R-S4 is predominantly positive, with drivers praising its high initial dry grip, track performance, and smooth, quiet street ride. Users frequently note its durability over multiple heat cycles and track days, though questions remain concerning daily driving longevity and sudden grip fall-off later in life. Comparisons to other tires highlight its superior traction compared to all-season alternatives.
“I had the DW's on my Porsche 911 last year and really liked them. I liked them so much, I just installed a set on my C6 base. I waiting for the 3' of snow to melt before I try them out.”
“Quote: Originally Posted by LbulletM Came back to say this. I bought the HanKooks and LOVE THEM!! Good wear but most of all Super Quiet. To each their own, not trying to start a war...just giving personal experience with the product....I dont drive in a matter to need High performance so I cant speak to cornering or load or any of the other gearhead tire talk....Smooth and Quiet!”
Based on 9 community posts
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
| Attribute | A · Hankook Ventus R-S4 | B · Yokohama Advan S4 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer High Performance tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
Hankook Ventus R-S4
Yokohama Advan S4
Winner: Hankook Ventus R-S4 — better handling, dry and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score. Yokohama Advan S4 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 3 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Hankook Ventus R-S4 scores 80 vs 47 on handling.
Hankook Ventus R-S4 scores 75 vs 52 on dry.
Hankook Ventus R-S4 scores 67 vs 44 on wet.
Hankook Ventus R-S4 scores 65 vs 54 on comfort.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Hankook Ventus R-S4, 67 vs 44 on our wet score.
Hankook Ventus R-S4, 75 vs 52 on our dry score.
Hankook Ventus R-S4, 65 vs 54 on our comfort score.
Hankook Ventus R-S4, 71 vs 64 on our treadwear score.
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology