Tests 59 · 1 test Owners 73 · 2 reviews
Hankook Ventus RS3 Z222 looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.
Head-to-head
Updated
Hankook Ventus RS3 Z222 vs Yokohama ADVAN A052 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 1 + 4 road tests and 2 + 213 owner reviews. How we score
ADVAN A052 is ahead, 72–67
Add your size for an exact match
/R
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 75 · 4 tests Owners 68 · 213 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 7 in 2025 Tire Rack Extreme Performance Track Tyre Test (subj. dry handling)
“Staggered BBSs Need Tires I have a set of BBS wheels that i have been restoring for my 89 944 NA. I am trying to figure out what tires to get and am running into a bit of trouble. The set of BBSs are 15in staggered. The front are 8in wide and the rear are 9in wide. When i had purchased these wheels they had 215/60R15s all around. Would this be a good fitment? I am hoping the rear will not look stretched. As i was researching staggered tires i ran into problems finding a matching set in the sizes 225 50R15 and 205 55R15. A local shop helped me find these for the front Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 (205 55R15) and these for the rear Yokohama ADVAN A052 (225 50R15). Im concerned to get these due to the tread pattern being drastically different. Another shop has Kumho Ecsta 4x KU22 picked out for the front. I would like to have performance summer tires that do not break the bank. If i were to do 215/60R15s all around i was looking at Falken Sincera SN250 A/S (which are not performance) or Vredestein Sprint Classic which i am not sure of. I am a bit at a loss here and would greatly appreciate any advice or help selecting tires as this is not something i am comfortable with given the lack of options at this wheel size.”
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
72
Dry
ADVAN A052 +779Why this score
Source Ventus RS3 Z222 ADVAN A052 Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 4 tests 67 73 Reviews found online 79 88 Dry Braking (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–1 91% 100% Dry Handling (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–1 99% 100% Dry Handling (tester's mark) (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–1 70% 100% Ventus RS3 Z222: 60% × 67 + 40% × 79 = 72
ADVAN A052: 60% × 73 + 40% × 87.6 = 79
-
60
Wet
ADVAN A052 +1272Why this score
Source Ventus RS3 Z222 ADVAN A052 Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 4 tests 52 77 Reviews found online 72 65 Wet Braking (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–1 82% 100% Ventus RS3 Z222: 60% × 51.9 + 40% × 71.8 = 60
ADVAN A052: 60% × 77.4 + 40% × 65.1 = 72
-
–
Snow
No comparison72Why this score
Source Ventus RS3 Z222 ADVAN A052 Professional tests (TWG score) – ≈ 71 (est.) Reviews found online – 73 ADVAN A052: 60% × 71 (est.) + 40% × 73.3 = 72
No road tests of snow for ADVAN A052. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).
-
67
Comfort
ADVAN A052 +370Why this score
Source Ventus RS3 Z222 ADVAN A052 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests ≈ 68 (est.) 74 Reviews found online 65 63 Ventus RS3 Z222: 60% × 68.4 (est.) + 40% × 65.1 = 67
ADVAN A052: 60% × 74.4 + 40% × 63.1 = 70
No road tests of comfort for Ventus RS3 Z222. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
–
Noise
No comparison76Why this score
Source Ventus RS3 Z222 ADVAN A052 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests – 77 Reviews found online – 76 ADVAN A052: 60% × 76.8 + 40% × 75.6 = 76
-
67
Treadwear
Ventus RS3 Z222 +1453Why this score
Source Ventus RS3 Z222 ADVAN A052 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 66 (est.) ≈ 59 (est.) Reviews found online 68 44 Ventus RS3 Z222: 60% × 66.3 (est.) + 40% × 67.9 = 67
ADVAN A052: 60% × 58.9 (est.) + 40% × 43.8 = 53
No road tests of treadwear for Ventus RS3 Z222. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
No road tests of treadwear for ADVAN A052. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
-
77
Handling (owners)
ADVAN A052 +582Why this score
Source Ventus RS3 Z222 ADVAN A052 Reviews found online 77 82
Scores at a glance
| Category | Hankook Ventus RS3 Z222 | Yokohama ADVAN A052 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 67 | 72 |
| Dry | 72 | 79 |
| Wet | 60 | 72 |
| Snow | – | 72 |
| Comfort | 67 | 70 |
| Noise | – | 76 |
| Treadwear | 67 | 53 |
| Handling (owners) | 77 | 82 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
67
/ 100
Ventus RS3 Z222
72
/ 100
ADVAN A052
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
The professional test results behind the scores
Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.
In the overall rankings of 1 tests that ran both, Hankook Ventus RS3 Z222 finished ahead 0 times and Yokohama ADVAN A052 1 times.
| Discipline | Category | Ventus RS3 Z222 | ADVAN A052 | Δ | Head-to-head |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dry Braking | Dry | 91% | 100% | −9.1 | 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2019 17 inch Track Day Tyre Test · 225/45 R17 |
| Dry Handling | Dry | 99% | 100% | −1.3 | 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2019 17 inch Track Day Tyre Test · 225/45 R17 |
| Dry Handling (tester's mark) | Dry | 70% | 100% | −30.0 | 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2019 17 inch Track Day Tyre Test · 225/45 R17 |
| Wet Braking | Wet | 82% | 100% | −17.9 | 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2019 17 inch Track Day Tyre Test · 225/45 R17 |
| Also published by the testers (not in the score) | |||||
| Overall Ranking | Overall | #3/5 | #1/5 | – | 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2019 17 inch Track Day Tyre Test · 225/45 R17 |
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Ventus RS3 Z222
Pros
- Exceptional dry grip with minimal warm-up time required
- Predictable and progressive handling characteristics
- Superior wet weather performance compared to typical semi-slick tires
Cons
- Limited suitability for snow or freezing conditions
- Performance is highly dependent on achieving optimal operating temperature
- Stiff sidewall construction may impact ride comfort for some users
Tire B ADVAN A052
Pros
- Class-leading dry grip and traction, often compared to dedicated racing slicks.
- Rapid warm-up time, providing peak performance almost immediately.
- Surprisingly high levels of wet-weather traction and hydroplaning resistance for a performance tire.
Cons
- Rapid tread wear, especially when used on heavy vehicles or without aggressive camber settings.
- Tendency to 'grease up' or lose performance during long, high-intensity track sessions.
- Soft sidewall construction can lead to vague steering feel or 'sponginess' compared to stiffer competitors.
What real owners are saying
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Tire A
Hankook Ventus RS3 Z222
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
Tire B
Positive
Yokohama ADVAN A052
Community members widely view the Yokohama ADVAN A052 as a top-tier, high-grip competition tire suited for autocross and track driving. While praised for its light weight and superior all-out performance compared to standard street and summer tires, users frequently discuss its high cost, soft compound, potential lack of tread longevity on long road trips, and tendency to fling rocks.
r/tires
·9 upvotes ·2020-01-18
“Yokohama ADVAN A052 315/30R18 and 265/35R18 - BEEFY!”
r/944
·7 upvotes ·2026-07-09
“Staggered BBSs Need Tires I have a set of BBS wheels that i have been restoring for my 89 944 NA. I am trying to figure out what tires to get and am running into a bit of trouble. The set of BBSs are 15in staggered. The front are 8in wide and the rear are 9in wide. When i had purchased these wheels they had 215/60R15s all around. Would this be a good fitment? I am hoping the rear will not look stretched. As i was researching staggered tires i ran into problems finding a matching set in the sizes 225 50R15 and 205 55R15. A local shop helped me find these for the front Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 (205 55R15) and these for the rear Yokohama ADVAN A052 (225 50R15). Im concerned to get these due to the tread pattern being drastically different. Another shop has Kumho Ecsta 4x KU22 picked out for the front. I would like to have performance summer tires that do not break the bank. If i were to do 215/60R15s all around i was looking at Falken Sincera SN250 A/S (which are not performance) or Vredestein Sprint Classic which i am not sure of. I am a bit at a loss here and would greatly appreciate any advice or help selecting tires as this is not something i am comfortable with given the lack of options at this wheel size.”
r/tires
·2 upvotes ·2023-07-04
“Long trip with Advans A052? I'm planning a trip to the Nürburgring to attend a trackday this October. The problem is that I live 1300 km away, so the tyres should be able to cope with that, some 20 laps at medium-fast pace at the Nordschleife, and the drive back home. Are the Advan A052 tyres way to soft for such a long trip? Will they last? Wouldn't it be wiser to settle for a more conservative set of Michelins PS4? The car is a 1986 Porsche 911 Carrera, 1210 kg... Read more”
Top themes
#competition and autocross performance#tire weight comparison#track day durability#soft compound longevity#200 treadwear grip#fitment and sizing
Based on 11 community posts
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Hankook Ventus RS3 Z222 | B · Yokohama ADVAN A052 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | — | 61 |
| Rim diameters | — | 13″ – 20″ |
| Tread depth | — | 7/32″ |
| UTQG | — | 200 A A |
| Sidewall | — | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | — | 51 psi |
Which one should you actually buy?
67
/ 100
Hankook Ventus RS3 Z222
72
/ 100
Yokohama ADVAN A052
Winner: Yokohama ADVAN A052 — better wet, dry and comfort. Pick the Hankook Ventus RS3 Z222 if treadwear matters most to you. Hankook Ventus RS3 Z222 rests on little evidence so far (1 test, 2 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Pick tire A
You want the longest tread life
Hankook Ventus RS3 Z222 scores 67 vs 53 on treadwear.
Pick tire B
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Yokohama ADVAN A052 scores 72 vs 60 on wet.
Pick tire B
You want the most grip on dry roads
Yokohama ADVAN A052 scores 79 vs 72 on dry.
Pick tire B
You want the most comfortable ride
Yokohama ADVAN A052 scores 70 vs 67 on comfort.
Tire A · Hankook Ventus RS3 Z222
Tire B · Yokohama ADVAN A052
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Ventus RS3 Z222 or ADVAN A052?
Which is better in the wet, Ventus RS3 Z222 or ADVAN A052?
Yokohama ADVAN A052, 72 vs 60 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Ventus RS3 Z222 or ADVAN A052?
Yokohama ADVAN A052, 79 vs 72 on our dry score.
Which is more comfortable, Ventus RS3 Z222 or ADVAN A052?
Yokohama ADVAN A052, 70 vs 67 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Ventus RS3 Z222 or ADVAN A052?
Hankook Ventus RS3 Z222, 67 vs 53 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology