Head-to-head Updated

Hankook Ventus S1 evo vs Kumho Ecsta PA51 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): 60% professional tests, 40% owner reviews.

Ecsta PA51 leads, 68–67 Narrow edge

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Tire AHankook

Ventus S1 evo

Summer

Tests 74 · 1 test Owners 64 · 45 reviews

Best test result: #5 of 11 in 2010 Auto Express Ultra High Performance Tyre Test (overall ranking)

Tire BKumho

Ecsta PA51

All Season

Tests – · 1 test Owners 67 · 165 reviews

Best test result: #7 of 19 in 2022 Consumer Reports Ultra High Performance All-Season Tires (overall ranking)

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 70

    Dry

    Ventus S1 evo +2
    68
    Why this score
    SourceVentus S1 evoEcsta PA51
    Professional tests (TWG score)75–
    Reviews found online6468
  2. 71

    Wet

    Ventus S1 evo +3
    68
    Why this score
    SourceVentus S1 evoEcsta PA51
    Professional tests (TWG score)74–
    Reviews found online6667
  3. –

    Snow

    No comparison
    62
    Why this score
    SourceVentus S1 evoEcsta PA51
    Reviews found online–57
  4. 65

    Comfort

    Ecsta PA51 +1
    66
    Why this score
    SourceVentus S1 evoEcsta PA51
    Reviews found online6263
  5. 67

    Noise

    Ecsta PA51 +2
    69
    Why this score
    SourceVentus S1 evoEcsta PA51
    Professional tests (TWG score)67–
    Reviews found online–72
  6. 64

    Treadwear

    Ecsta PA51 +7
    71
    Why this score
    SourceVentus S1 evoEcsta PA51
    Professional tests (TWG score)–70
    Reviews found online6372
  7. 64

    Handling

    Ecsta PA51 +2
    66
    Why this score
    SourceVentus S1 evoEcsta PA51
    Reviews found online6466
Scores at a glance
Hankook Ventus S1 evo vs Kumho Ecsta PA51: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryHankook Ventus S1 evoKumho Ecsta PA51
Relative Score 67 68
Dry 70 68
Wet 71 68
Snow – 62
Comfort 65 66
Noise 67 69
Treadwear 64 71
Handling 64 66

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost

Neither tire has a score here yet, so this weight changes nothing.

Less important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Less important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Ventus S1 evo

Ecsta PA51

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

The professional test results behind the scores

Each result is shown as % of the best tire in that test. “Same test” rows are the strictest comparison: both tires were measured side by side.

DisciplineCategoryVentus S1 evoEcsta PA51ΔBoth?
Overall Ranking Overall 20% #5/11 · 2010 Auto Express Ultra High Performance Tyre Test 67% #7/19 · 2022 Consumer Reports Ultra High Performance All-Season Tires −46.7 Different tests

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Ventus S1 evo

Pros

  • Excellent dry grip and sporty, predictable handling
  • High value for money compared to more expensive premium brands
  • Quiet and comfortable ride quality

Cons

  • Subpar or inconsistent wet weather performance reported by some users
  • Rapid tread wear on specific vehicles or under aggressive driving
  • Tendency for the rubber to crack or perish prematurely along the grooves over time
All owner themes in the Ventus S1 evo review

Tire B Ecsta PA51

Pros

  • Excellent price-to-performance ratio
  • Strong dry pavement traction and cornering grip
  • Quiet and smooth ride quality

Cons

  • Inconsistent performance in heavy rain or standing water
  • Some reports of increased road noise over time
  • Limited availability in certain niche sizes
All owner themes in the Ecsta PA51 review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Hankook Ventus S1 evo B · Kumho Ecsta PA51
CategorySummerAll Season
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available2913
Rim diameters15″ – 22″16″ – 19″
Tread depth—10.5/32″
UTQG—500 A A
Treadwear warranty—45,000 mi
Sidewall—Blackwall
Max pressure—51 psi

Which one should you actually buy?

Hankook Ventus S1 evo

Kumho Ecsta PA51

Too close to call: Hankook Ventus S1 evo and Kumho Ecsta PA51 are within 2 points overall. Hankook Ventus S1 evo is stronger on wet. Kumho Ecsta PA51 is stronger on treadwear.

Pick tire B You want the longest tread life

Kumho Ecsta PA51 scores 71 vs 64 on treadwear.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Hankook Ventus S1 evo scores 71 vs 68 on wet.

Tire A · Hankook Ventus S1 evo
Tire B · Kumho Ecsta PA51

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.

68

Narrow edge

Ecsta PA51

Amazon