tirewheelguide
Head-to-head Updated

Hankook Ventus S1 evo vs Nexen N Fera SU1 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 1 + 3 road tests and 45 + 165 owner reviews. How we score

Ventus S1 evo is ahead, 68–63

Check price on Amazon · Ventus S1 evo or N Fera SU1 on Amazon
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Hankook Ventus S1 evo
Tire AHankook

Ventus S1 evo

Summer

± 7

Tests 74 · 1 test Owners 63 · 45 reviews

Best test result: #2 of 8 in 2018 Auto Bild 20 inch UHP Tyre Test (dry handling)

Nexen N Fera SU1
Tire BNexen

N Fera SU1

Summer

± 8

Tests 63 · 3 tests Owners 62 · 165 reviews

Best test result: #6 of 22 in 2022 Consumer Reports Ultra High Performance Summer Tires (tested tread life (miles))

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 70

    Dry

    Ventus S1 evo +12
    58
    Why this score
    SourceVentus S1 evoN Fera SU1
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 2 tests7555
    Reviews found online6364

    Ventus S1 evo: 60% × 75.1 + 40% × 63.1 = 70

    N Fera SU1: 60% × 54.9 + 40% × 63.7 = 58

  2. 71

    Wet

    Ventus S1 evo +7
    64
    Why this score
    SourceVentus S1 evoN Fera SU1
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 2 tests7562
    Reviews found online6667

    Ventus S1 evo: 60% × 74.8 + 40% × 66 = 71

    N Fera SU1: 60% × 62.2 + 40% × 67.1 = 64

  3. –

    Snow

    No comparison
    58
    Why this score
    SourceVentus S1 evoN Fera SU1
    Professional tests (TWG score)–≈ 64 (est.)
    Reviews found online–49

    N Fera SU1: 60% × 63.8 (est.) + 40% × 49.3 = 58

    No road tests of snow for N Fera SU1. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

  4. 63

    Comfort

    N Fera SU1 +2
    65
    Why this score
    SourceVentus S1 evoN Fera SU1
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 2 tests≈ 67 (est.)66
    Reviews found online6065

    Ventus S1 evo: 40% × 66.9 (est.) + 60% × 59.8 = 63

    N Fera SU1: 40% × 65.7 + 60% × 65 = 65

    No road tests of comfort for Ventus S1 evo. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

  5. 67

    Noise

    N Fera SU1 +2
    69
    Why this score
    SourceVentus S1 evoN Fera SU1
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 1 tests6769
    Reviews found online≈ 66 (est.)70

    Ventus S1 evo: 60% × 66.9 + 40% × 66.4 (est.) = 67

    N Fera SU1: 60% × 69.3 + 40% × 69.5 = 69

    No owner ratings of noise for Ventus S1 evo. The owner half is the owners’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.

  6. 64

    Treadwear

    N Fera SU1 +2
    66
    Why this score
    SourceVentus S1 evoN Fera SU1
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests≈ 65 (est.)70
    Reviews found online6359

    Ventus S1 evo: 60% × 65.1 (est.) + 40% × 62.5 = 64

    N Fera SU1: 60% × 70.2 + 40% × 59.4 = 66

    No road tests of treadwear for Ventus S1 evo. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

  7. 63

    Handling (owners)

    N Fera SU1 +3
    66
    Why this score
    SourceVentus S1 evoN Fera SU1
    Reviews found online6366
  8. 70

    Efficiency

    N Fera SU1 +6
    76
    Why this score
    SourceVentus S1 evoN Fera SU1
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 2 tests7076
Scores at a glance
CategoryHankook Ventus S1 evoNexen N Fera SU1
Relative Score 68 63
Dry 70 58
Wet 71 64
Snow – 58
Comfort 63 65
Noise 67 69
Treadwear 64 66
Handling (owners) 63 66
Efficiency 70 76

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 7

Ventus S1 evo

± 8

N Fera SU1

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

The professional test results behind the scores

Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.

DisciplineCategoryVentus S1 evoN Fera SU1ΔHead-to-head
Dry Braking Dry 95% #5/8 · 2018 Auto Bild 20 inch UHP Tyre Test 94% #4/6 · 2023 APAC Tyre Test – Different tests
Dry Handling Dry 100% #2/8 · 2018 Auto Bild 20 inch UHP Tyre Test 95% #4/6 · 2023 APAC Tyre Test – Different tests
Straight Aquaplaning Wet 90% #8/8 · 2018 Auto Bild 20 inch UHP Tyre Test 98% #5/6 · 2023 APAC Tyre Test – Different tests
Wet Braking Wet 96% #3/8 · 2018 Auto Bild 20 inch UHP Tyre Test 94% #5/6 · 2023 APAC Tyre Test – Different tests
Wet Handling Wet 98% #5/8 · 2018 Auto Bild 20 inch UHP Tyre Test 95% #3/6 · 2023 APAC Tyre Test – Different tests
Noise Noise 99% #5/8 · 2018 Auto Bild 20 inch UHP Tyre Test 99% #3/6 · 2023 APAC Tyre Test – Different tests
Rolling Resistance Efficiency 98% #3/8 · 2018 Auto Bild 20 inch UHP Tyre Test 99% #2/6 · 2023 APAC Tyre Test – Different tests
Also published by the testers (not in the score)
Overall Ranking Overall #3/8 2018 Auto Bild 20 inch UHP Tyre Test #5/6 2023 APAC Tyre Test – Different tests

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Ventus S1 evo

Pros

  • Excellent dry grip and sporty, predictable handling
  • High value for money compared to more expensive premium brands
  • Quiet and comfortable ride quality

Cons

  • Subpar or inconsistent wet weather performance reported by some users
  • Rapid tread wear on specific vehicles or under aggressive driving
  • Tendency for the rubber to crack or perish prematurely along the grooves over time
All owner themes in the Ventus S1 evo review

Tire B N Fera SU1

Pros

  • Exceptional value and significantly lower price compared to premium brands
  • Remarkably quiet ride and high overall comfort
  • Strong dry and wet grip for daily commuting and spirited driving

Cons

  • Soft sidewalls can cause vague handling, body roll, or a floating sensation on heavier vehicles
  • Faster than average tread wear or inconsistent durability for some users
  • Reports of rubber cracking or splitting along the sidewalls and tread blocks over time
All owner themes in the N Fera SU1 review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Hankook Ventus S1 evo B · Nexen N Fera SU1
CategorySummerSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available2997
Rim diameters15″ – 22″15″ – 24″
Tread depth—9/32″
UTQG280 AA A300 A A
Treadwear warranty—25,000 mi
Sidewall—Blackwall
Max pressure—51 psi
Sizes in common1414

Which one should you actually buy?

Hankook Ventus S1 evo

Nexen N Fera SU1

Winner: Hankook Ventus S1 evo — better dry and wet. Pick the Nexen N Fera SU1 if efficiency matters most to you.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

Hankook Ventus S1 evo scores 70 vs 58 on dry.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Hankook Ventus S1 evo scores 71 vs 64 on wet.

Pick tire B You want lower fuel or energy use

Nexen N Fera SU1 scores 76 vs 70 on efficiency.

Tire A · Hankook Ventus S1 evo
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Nexen N Fera SU1
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Ventus S1 evo or N Fera SU1?

Which is better in the wet, Ventus S1 evo or N Fera SU1?

Hankook Ventus S1 evo, 71 vs 64 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Ventus S1 evo or N Fera SU1?

Hankook Ventus S1 evo, 70 vs 58 on our dry score.

Which is quieter, Ventus S1 evo or N Fera SU1?

Neither, by our numbers: 67 vs 69 on the noise score, within 3 points.

Which is more comfortable, Ventus S1 evo or N Fera SU1?

Neither, by our numbers: 63 vs 65 on the comfort score, within 3 points.

Which lasts longer, Ventus S1 evo or N Fera SU1?

Neither, by our numbers: 64 vs 66 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.

Which rolls more easily, Ventus S1 evo or N Fera SU1?

Nexen N Fera SU1, 76 vs 70 on our efficiency score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology