Tests 75 · 2 tests Owners 58 · 20 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 10 in 2017 Auto Bild Summer SUV Tyre Test (wet braking)
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 2 + 0 road tests and 20 + 32 owner reviews. How we score
Optimo 4S is ahead, 75–66
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 75 · 2 tests Owners 58 · 20 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 10 in 2017 Auto Bild Summer SUV Tyre Test (wet braking)
Tests – · none yet Owners 76 · 32 reviews
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
| Source | Ventus S1 evo2 SUV | Optimo 4S |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 2 / – tests | 73 | ≈ 71 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 62 | 77 |
Ventus S1 evo2 SUV: 60% × 72.7 + 40% × 61.9 = 68
Optimo 4S: 60% × 71.5 (est.) + 40% × 76.6 = 74
No road tests of dry for Optimo 4S. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
| Source | Ventus S1 evo2 SUV | Optimo 4S |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 2 / – tests | 76 | ≈ 77 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 65 | 82 |
Ventus S1 evo2 SUV: 60% × 76.4 + 40% × 65.3 = 72
Optimo 4S: 60% × 76.8 (est.) + 40% × 81.8 = 79
No road tests of wet for Optimo 4S. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
| Source | Ventus S1 evo2 SUV | Optimo 4S |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | ≈ 66 (est.) | ≈ 71 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 57 | 78 |
Ventus S1 evo2 SUV: 40% × 66.3 (est.) + 60% × 56.8 = 61
Optimo 4S: 40% × 70.6 (est.) + 60% × 78.3 = 75
No road tests of comfort for Ventus S1 evo2 SUV. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
No road tests of comfort for Optimo 4S. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
| Source | Ventus S1 evo2 SUV | Optimo 4S |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | ≈ 60 (est.) | ≈ 68 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 47 | 70 |
Ventus S1 evo2 SUV: 60% × 59.6 (est.) + 40% × 47.3 = 55
Optimo 4S: 60% × 67.9 (est.) + 40% × 70.4 = 69
No road tests of treadwear for Ventus S1 evo2 SUV. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
No road tests of treadwear for Optimo 4S. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
| Source | Ventus S1 evo2 SUV | Optimo 4S |
|---|---|---|
| Reviews found online | 61 | 75 |
| Category | Hankook Ventus S1 evo2 SUV | Hankook Optimo 4S |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 66 | 75 |
| Dry | 68 | 74 |
| Wet | 72 | 79 |
| Comfort | 61 | 75 |
| Treadwear | 55 | 69 |
| Handling (owners) | 61 | 75 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Ventus S1 evo2 SUV
Optimo 4S
Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.
| Discipline | Category | Ventus S1 evo2 SUV | Optimo 4S | Δ | Head-to-head |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Also published by the testers (not in the score) | |||||
| Overall Ranking | Overall | #6/8 2019 Auto Express SUV Tyre Test | #7/7 2016 ADAC All Season Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
| Attribute | A · Hankook Ventus S1 evo2 SUV | B · Hankook Optimo 4S |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | All Season |
| Vehicle type | SUV and 4x4 | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 38 | 35 |
| Rim diameters | 17″ – 22″ | 13″ – 17″ |
| UTQG | 220 - 420 A - AA A | 520 - 600 A A |
| Sizes in common | 1 | 1 |
Hankook Ventus S1 evo2 SUV
Hankook Optimo 4S
Winner: Hankook Optimo 4S — better comfort, treadwear and handling. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Hankook Optimo 4S scores 75 vs 61 on comfort.
Hankook Optimo 4S scores 69 vs 55 on treadwear.
Hankook Optimo 4S scores 75 vs 61 on handling.
Hankook Optimo 4S scores 79 vs 72 on wet.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Hankook Optimo 4S, 79 vs 72 on our wet score.
Hankook Optimo 4S, 74 vs 68 on our dry score.
Hankook Optimo 4S, 75 vs 61 on our comfort score.
Hankook Optimo 4S, 69 vs 55 on our treadwear score.
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology