Yokohama Advan Neova AD08 looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.

Head-to-head Updated

Hankook Ventus S1 evo2 SUV vs Yokohama Advan Neova AD08 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 2 + 0 road tests and 20 + 31 owner reviews. How we score

Advan Neova AD08 leads, 71–67 Narrow edge

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Hankook Ventus S1 evo2 SUV

Tests 74 · 2 tests Owners 62 · 20 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 10 in 2017 Auto Bild Summer SUV Tyre Test (wet braking)

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 69

    Dry

    Advan Neova AD08 +6
    75
    Why this score
    SourceVentus S1 evo2 SUVAdvan Neova AD08
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 2 / – tests73≈ 73 (est.)
    Reviews found online6580

    Ventus S1 evo2 SUV: 60% × 72.6 + 40% × 64.5 = 69

    Advan Neova AD08: 60% × 72.5 (est.) + 40% × 79.7 = 75

    No road tests of dry for Advan Neova AD08. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

  2. 73

    Wet

    Ventus S1 evo2 SUV +4
    69
    Why this score
    SourceVentus S1 evo2 SUVAdvan Neova AD08
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 2 / – tests76≈ 69 (est.)
    Reviews found online6969

    Ventus S1 evo2 SUV: 60% × 76.1 + 40% × 68.5 = 73

    Advan Neova AD08: 60% × 69.1 (est.) + 40% × 68.5 = 69

    No road tests of wet for Advan Neova AD08. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

  3. –

    Snow

    No comparison
    65
    Why this score
    SourceVentus S1 evo2 SUVAdvan Neova AD08
    Professional tests (TWG score)–≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online–61

    Advan Neova AD08: 60% × 67 (est.) + 40% × 61.3 = 65

    No road tests of snow for Advan Neova AD08. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).

  4. 65

    Comfort

    Advan Neova AD08 +3
    68
    Why this score
    SourceVentus S1 evo2 SUVAdvan Neova AD08
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 68 (est.)≈ 69 (est.)
    Reviews found online6167

    Ventus S1 evo2 SUV: 60% × 67.7 (est.) + 40% × 61.1 = 65

    Advan Neova AD08: 60% × 68.7 (est.) + 40% × 66.6 = 68

    No road tests of comfort for Ventus S1 evo2 SUV or Advan Neova AD08. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. –

    Noise

    No comparison
    67
    Why this score
    SourceVentus S1 evo2 SUVAdvan Neova AD08
    Professional tests (TWG score)–≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online–68

    Advan Neova AD08: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 67.8 = 67

    No road tests of noise for Advan Neova AD08. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 58

    Treadwear

    Advan Neova AD08 +5
    63
    Why this score
    SourceVentus S1 evo2 SUVAdvan Neova AD08
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 61 (est.)≈ 64 (est.)
    Reviews found online5261

    Ventus S1 evo2 SUV: 60% × 61.4 (est.) + 40% × 52 = 58

    Advan Neova AD08: 60% × 64.3 (est.) + 40% × 61.2 = 63

    No road tests of treadwear for Ventus S1 evo2 SUV. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

    No road tests of treadwear for Advan Neova AD08. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

  7. 63

    Handling (owners)

    Advan Neova AD08 +16
    79
    Why this score
    SourceVentus S1 evo2 SUVAdvan Neova AD08
    Reviews found online6379
Scores at a glance
Hankook Ventus S1 evo2 SUV vs Yokohama Advan Neova AD08: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryHankook Ventus S1 evo2 SUVYokohama Advan Neova AD08
Relative Score 67 71
Dry 69 75
Wet 73 69
Snow – 65
Comfort 65 68
Noise – 67
Treadwear 58 63
Handling (owners) 63 79

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Ventus S1 evo2 SUV

Advan Neova AD08

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

The professional test results behind the scores

Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.

DisciplineCategoryVentus S1 evo2 SUVAdvan Neova AD08ΔHead-to-head
Also published by the testers (not in the score)
Overall Ranking Overall #6/8 2019 Auto Express SUV Tyre Test #4/10 2014 EVO Max Performance Summer Tyre Test – Different tests

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Ventus S1 evo2 SUV

Pros

  • Excellent wet and dry grip with strong confidence-inspiring handling
  • High value for money compared to premium Tier-1 brand alternatives
  • Good ride comfort and low road noise for highway cruising

Cons

  • Premature outer block and edge wear, particularly on front axles
  • Poor performance in snow and ice, typical of summer tires
  • Limited off-road capability
All owner themes in the Ventus S1 evo2 SUV review

Tire B Advan Neova AD08

Pros

  • Phenomenal dry grip and cornering traction
  • Exceptional steering feedback and crisp response
  • Stiff, robust sidewall and carcass construction

Cons

  • Prone to overheating and rubber degradation/chunking during heavy track use
  • Reduced performance and aquaplaning tendencies in heavy standing water
  • Limited size availability for larger rims
All owner themes in the Advan Neova AD08 review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Hankook Ventus S1 evo2 SUV B · Yokohama Advan Neova AD08
CategorySummerSummer
Vehicle typeSUV and 4x4Passenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available38—
Rim diameters17″ – 22″—
Tread depth—9/32″
UTQG—180 A A
Sidewall—Blackwall
Max pressure—51 psi

Which one should you actually buy?

Hankook Ventus S1 evo2 SUV

Yokohama Advan Neova AD08

Narrow edge: Yokohama Advan Neova AD08 — better handling, dry and treadwear. Pick the Hankook Ventus S1 evo2 SUV if wet matters most to you.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Yokohama Advan Neova AD08 scores 79 vs 63 on handling.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Yokohama Advan Neova AD08 scores 75 vs 69 on dry.

Pick tire B You want the longest tread life

Yokohama Advan Neova AD08 scores 63 vs 58 on treadwear.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Hankook Ventus S1 evo2 SUV scores 73 vs 69 on wet.

Tire A · Hankook Ventus S1 evo2 SUV
Tire B · Yokohama Advan Neova AD08

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Ventus S1 evo2 SUV or Advan Neova AD08?

Which is better in the wet, Ventus S1 evo2 SUV or Advan Neova AD08?

Hankook Ventus S1 evo2 SUV, 73 vs 69 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Ventus S1 evo2 SUV or Advan Neova AD08?

Yokohama Advan Neova AD08, 75 vs 69 on our dry score.

Which is more comfortable, Ventus S1 evo2 SUV or Advan Neova AD08?

Yokohama Advan Neova AD08, 68 vs 65 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Ventus S1 evo2 SUV or Advan Neova AD08?

Yokohama Advan Neova AD08, 63 vs 58 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology