Tests 74 · 2 tests Owners 62 · 20 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 10 in 2017 Auto Bild Summer SUV Tyre Test (wet braking)
Yokohama Advan Neova AD08 looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 2 + 0 road tests and 20 + 31 owner reviews. How we score
Advan Neova AD08 leads, 71–67 Narrow edge
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 74 · 2 tests Owners 62 · 20 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 10 in 2017 Auto Bild Summer SUV Tyre Test (wet braking)
Tests – · none yet Owners 69 · 31 reviews
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
| Source | Ventus S1 evo2 SUV | Advan Neova AD08 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 2 / – tests | 73 | ≈ 73 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 65 | 80 |
Ventus S1 evo2 SUV: 60% × 72.6 + 40% × 64.5 = 69
Advan Neova AD08: 60% × 72.5 (est.) + 40% × 79.7 = 75
No road tests of dry for Advan Neova AD08. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
| Source | Ventus S1 evo2 SUV | Advan Neova AD08 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 2 / – tests | 76 | ≈ 69 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 69 | 69 |
Ventus S1 evo2 SUV: 60% × 76.1 + 40% × 68.5 = 73
Advan Neova AD08: 60% × 69.1 (est.) + 40% × 68.5 = 69
No road tests of wet for Advan Neova AD08. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
| Source | Ventus S1 evo2 SUV | Advan Neova AD08 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | ≈ 67 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | – | 61 |
Advan Neova AD08: 60% × 67 (est.) + 40% × 61.3 = 65
No road tests of snow for Advan Neova AD08. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).
| Source | Ventus S1 evo2 SUV | Advan Neova AD08 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | ≈ 68 (est.) | ≈ 69 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 61 | 67 |
Ventus S1 evo2 SUV: 60% × 67.7 (est.) + 40% × 61.1 = 65
Advan Neova AD08: 60% × 68.7 (est.) + 40% × 66.6 = 68
No road tests of comfort for Ventus S1 evo2 SUV or Advan Neova AD08. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
| Source | Ventus S1 evo2 SUV | Advan Neova AD08 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | ≈ 67 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | – | 68 |
Advan Neova AD08: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 67.8 = 67
No road tests of noise for Advan Neova AD08. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
| Source | Ventus S1 evo2 SUV | Advan Neova AD08 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | ≈ 61 (est.) | ≈ 64 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 52 | 61 |
Ventus S1 evo2 SUV: 60% × 61.4 (est.) + 40% × 52 = 58
Advan Neova AD08: 60% × 64.3 (est.) + 40% × 61.2 = 63
No road tests of treadwear for Ventus S1 evo2 SUV. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
No road tests of treadwear for Advan Neova AD08. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
| Source | Ventus S1 evo2 SUV | Advan Neova AD08 |
|---|---|---|
| Reviews found online | 63 | 79 |
| Category | Hankook Ventus S1 evo2 SUV | Yokohama Advan Neova AD08 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 67 | 71 |
| Dry | 69 | 75 |
| Wet | 73 | 69 |
| Snow | – | 65 |
| Comfort | 65 | 68 |
| Noise | – | 67 |
| Treadwear | 58 | 63 |
| Handling (owners) | 63 | 79 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Ventus S1 evo2 SUV
Advan Neova AD08
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.
| Discipline | Category | Ventus S1 evo2 SUV | Advan Neova AD08 | Δ | Head-to-head |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Also published by the testers (not in the score) | |||||
| Overall Ranking | Overall | #6/8 2019 Auto Express SUV Tyre Test | #4/10 2014 EVO Max Performance Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
| Attribute | A · Hankook Ventus S1 evo2 SUV | B · Yokohama Advan Neova AD08 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | SUV and 4x4 | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 38 | — |
| Rim diameters | 17″ – 22″ | — |
| Tread depth | — | 9/32″ |
| UTQG | — | 180 A A |
| Sidewall | — | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | — | 51 psi |
Hankook Ventus S1 evo2 SUV
Yokohama Advan Neova AD08
Narrow edge: Yokohama Advan Neova AD08 — better handling, dry and treadwear. Pick the Hankook Ventus S1 evo2 SUV if wet matters most to you.
Yokohama Advan Neova AD08 scores 79 vs 63 on handling.
Yokohama Advan Neova AD08 scores 75 vs 69 on dry.
Yokohama Advan Neova AD08 scores 63 vs 58 on treadwear.
Hankook Ventus S1 evo2 SUV scores 73 vs 69 on wet.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Hankook Ventus S1 evo2 SUV, 73 vs 69 on our wet score.
Yokohama Advan Neova AD08, 75 vs 69 on our dry score.
Yokohama Advan Neova AD08, 68 vs 65 on our comfort score.
Yokohama Advan Neova AD08, 63 vs 58 on our treadwear score.
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology